Literature DB >> 35258532

Predictive Accuracy of a Perioperative Laboratory Test-Based Prediction Model for Moderate to Severe Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery.

Sevag Demirjian1, C Allen Bashour2, Andrew Shaw2, Jesse D Schold3, James Simon1, David Anthony2,4, Edward Soltesz5, Crystal A Gadegbeku1.   

Abstract

Importance: Effective treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) is predicated on timely diagnosis; however, the lag in the increase in serum creatinine levels after kidney injury may delay therapy initiation. Objective: To determine the derivation and validation of predictive models for AKI after cardiac surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multivariable prediction models were derived based on a retrospective observational cohort of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2000 and December 2019 from a US academic medical center (n = 58 526) and subsequently validated on an external cohort from 3 US community hospitals (n = 4734). The date of final follow-up was January 15, 2020. Exposures: Perioperative change in serum creatinine and postoperative blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, and albumin from the first metabolic panel after cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration measures for moderate to severe AKI, per Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), and AKI requiring dialysis prediction models within 72 hours and 14 days following surgery.
Results: In a derivation cohort of 58 526 patients (median [IQR] age, 66 [56-74] years; 39 173 [67%] men; 51 503 [91%] White participants), the rates of moderate to severe AKI and AKIrequiring dialysis were 2674 (4.6%) and 868 (1.48%) within 72 hours and 3156 (5.4%) and 1018 (1.74%) within 14 days after surgery. The median (IQR) interval to first metabolic panel from conclusion of the surgical procedure was 10 (7-12) hours. In the derivation cohort, the metabolic panel-based models had excellent predictive discrimination for moderate to severe AKI within 72 hours (AUC, 0.876 [95% CI, 0.869-0.883]) and 14 days (AUC, 0.854 [95% CI, 0.850-0.861]) after the surgical procedure and for AKI requiring dialysis within 72 hours (AUC, 0.916 [95% CI, 0.907-0.926]) and 14 days (AUC, 0.900 [95% CI, 0.889-0.909]) after the surgical procedure. In the validation cohort of 4734 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 (60-74) years; 3361 [71%] men; 3977 [87%] White participants), the models for moderate to severe AKI after the surgical procedure showed AUCs of 0.860 (95% CI, 0.838-0.882) within 72 hours and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.820-0.865) within 14 days and the models for AKI requiring dialysis and 14 days had an AUC of 0.879 (95% CI, 0.840-0.918) within 72 hours and 0.873 (95% CI, 0.836-0.910) within 14 days after the surgical procedure. Calibration assessed by Spiegelhalter z test showed P >.05 indicating adequate calibration for both validation and derivation models. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a prediction model based on perioperative basic metabolic panel laboratory values demonstrated good predictive accuracy for moderate to severe acute kidney injury within 72 hours and 14 days after the surgical procedure. Further research is needed to determine whether use of the risk prediction tool improves clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35258532      PMCID: PMC8905398          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.1751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   157.335


  31 in total

1.  On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison and clinical suitability of eight prediction models for cardiac surgery-related acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Harmke D Kiers; Mark van den Boogaard; Micha C J Schoenmakers; Johannes G van der Hoeven; Henry A van Swieten; Suzanne Heemskerk; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Paul M Palevsky; Kathleen D Liu; Patrick D Brophy; Lakhmir S Chawla; Chirag R Parikh; Charuhas V Thakar; Ashita J Tolwani; Sushrut S Waikar; Steven D Weisbord
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Predictive models for acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Sevag Demirjian; Jesse D Schold; Jose Navia; Tara M Mastracci; Emil P Paganini; Jean-Pierre Yared; Charles A Bashour
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Prevention of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury by Implementing the KDIGO Guidelines in High-Risk Patients Identified by Biomarkers: The PrevAKI-Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alexander Zarbock; Mira Küllmar; Marlies Ostermann; Gianluca Lucchese; Kamran Baig; Armando Cennamo; Ronak Rajani; Stuart McCorkell; Christian Arndt; Hinnerk Wulf; Marc Irqsusi; Fabrizio Monaco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Mercedes García Alvarez; Stefano Italiano; Jordi Miralles Bagan; Gudrun Kunst; Shrijit Nair; Camilla L'Acqua; Eric Hoste; Wim Vandenberghe; Patrick M Honore; John A Kellum; Lui G Forni; Philippe Grieshaber; Christina Massoth; Raphael Weiss; Joachim Gerss; Carola Wempe; Melanie Meersch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Mild renal failure is associated with adverse outcome after cardiac valve surgery.

Authors:  R J Anderson; M O'Brien; S MaWhinney; C B VillaNueva; T E Moritz; G K Sethi; W G Henderson; K E Hammermeister; F L Grover; A L Shroyer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients.

Authors:  Etienne Macedo; Josée Bouchard; Sharon H Soroko; Glenn M Chertow; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Incidence and circumstances of serum creatinine increase after abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  Frédérique Ryckwaert; Pierre Alric; Marie-Christine Picot; Kela Djoufelkit; Pascal Colson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury.

Authors:  Won K Han; Veronique Bailly; Rekha Abichandani; Ravi Thadhani; Joseph V Bonventre
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  3 in total

1.  Performance of resistive index and semi-quantitative power doppler ultrasound score in predicting acute kidney injury: A meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Qiong Wei; Yu Zhu; Weifeng Zhen; Xiaoning Zhang; Zhenhua Shi; Ling Zhang; Jiuju Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Nomogram Prediction Model of Serum Chloride and Sodium Ions on the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Jiaqi Lu; Zhili Qi; Jingyuan Liu; Pei Liu; Tian Li; Meili Duan; Ang Li
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Prediction of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications after lung resection in a Chinese population: A machine learning-based study.

Authors:  Guanghua Huang; Lei Liu; Luyi Wang; Shanqing Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.