Literature DB >> 35258409

Using Crowdsourcing for Alcohol and Nicotine Use Research: Prevalence, Data Quality, and Attrition on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Jillian M Rung1,2,3, Shahar Almog1, Andrea Vásquez Ferreiro1, Meredith S Berry1,2.   

Abstract

BackgroundGauging the feasibility of using Amazon Mechanical Turk ® (MTurk) for various types of substance use research is precluded by a lack of information pertaining to the recruitment process in published studies utilizing it and concurrent information on data quality. ObjectiveThe present report addressed this gap by documenting the prevalence of alcohol and nicotine use, self-reported major health conditions, and information on data quality and retention on MTurk. Individuals 21 to 90 years old (N = 1101, Mdn age = 30) with United States-based MTurk accounts completed a stand-alone screening survey. The screening consisted of basic demographic, substance use, and physical/mental health questions, as well as items to gauge language proficiency/attention (i.e., data quality). ResultsPoor quality data was infrequent (6.5% of participants) and associated with self-reported non-United States residence, affirmative responding (e.g., currently pregnant, using both alcohol and nicotine), and other response characteristics (e.g., not disclosing health conditions). Among those passing quality checks, alcohol and nicotine use were relatively common (71.5% and 24.8%). Major physical (6.3%) and mental health conditions (14.8%) were less common. Despite not sending direct invitations, most eligible participants returned to and completed the main study (81.7%). Conclusions/Importance: Alcohol and nicotine use were relatively common among MTurk workers and retention rates were high. Together with the low prevalence of poor quality data, MTurk appears to remain a fruitful platform for substance use research; although researchers must be diligent in using appropriate screening tools, as substance use was sometimes associated with poor data quality and MTurk account information may not be reliable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowdsourcing; alcohol; nicotine; retention; substance use

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35258409      PMCID: PMC9157393          DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2046096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.362


  13 in total

1.  The pitfall of experimenting on the web: How unattended selective attrition leads to surprising (yet false) research conclusions.

Authors:  Haotian Zhou; Ayelet Fishbach
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-06-13

2.  Are you for real? Maximizing participant eligibility on Amazon's Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Hyoun S Kim; David C Hodgins
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 3.  Comparing Amazon's Mechanical Turk Platform to Conventional Data Collection Methods in the Health and Medical Research Literature.

Authors:  Karoline Mortensen; Taylor L Hughes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Crowdsourcing Trauma: Psychopathology in a Trauma-Exposed Sample Recruited via Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Katherine van Stolk-Cooke; Andrew Brown; Anne Maheux; Justin Parent; Rex Forehand; Matthew Price
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2018-07-19

5.  Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.

Authors:  Alexandra M Mellis; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Contribution of alcohol- and cigarette-related cues to concurrent reinforcer choice in humans.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Cecilia L Bergeria
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 7.  The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; William W Stoops
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research.

Authors:  Kimberly A Arditte; Demet Çek; Ashley M Shaw; Kiara R Timpano
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-08-24

9.  Setting a goal could help you control: Comparing the effect of health goal versus general episodic future thinking on health behaviors among cigarette smokers and obese individuals.

Authors:  Liqa N Athamneh; Madison D Stein; Elysia H Lin; Jeffrey S Stein; Alexandra M Mellis; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Demographic Stability on Mechanical Turk Despite COVID-19.

Authors:  Aaron J Moss; Cheskie Rosenzweig; Jonathan Robinson; Leib Litman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.