Literature DB >> 35257528

Clinical Features of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Tae Hoon Oh1, Seon Hee Woo1, Sungyoup Hong2, Carol Lee3, Woon Jeong Lee1, Si Kyoung Jeong4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the implementation of the nationwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination campaign, emergency departments (EDs) have had an increasing number of patients reporting postvaccination cardiovascular adverse effects. We investigated the clinical features of patients who visited the ED for cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in two EDs. Patients with cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination who visited EDs between June 1, 2021, and October 15, 2021, were selected. The clinical data of these patients were collected by reviewing medical records.
RESULTS: Among 683 patients, 426 (62.4%) were female. The number of patients in their 20s was the highest (38.9% of males, 28.2% of females) (P < 0.001). More patients visited the ED for adverse reactions following the first vaccine dose than following the second dose (67.6% vs. 32.2%). Chief complaints were chest pain/discomfort (74.4%), dyspnea (14.3%) and palpitation (11.3%). The final diagnosis was a nonspecific cause (63.1%), and 663 (97.1%) patients were discharged from the ED. The admission rate was higher in males than in females (3.9% vs. 1.9%). Myocarditis was diagnosed in four males, who showed mild clinical progression and were discharged within 5 hospital days.
CONCLUSION: Most patients who visited the ED with cardiovascular adverse reactions were discharged from the ED, but some were admitted for other medical diseases as well as adverse vaccine reactions. Therefore, further surveillance and a differential diagnosis of cardiovascular adverse events after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination should be considered by emergency physicians.
© 2022 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Reaction; COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination; Cardiovascular Symptoms; Emergency Department

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257528      PMCID: PMC8901880          DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Med Sci        ISSN: 1011-8934            Impact factor:   2.153


INTRODUCTION

After the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were developed at an unprecedented rate, and governments have been granting emergency use authority for these vaccines. In South Korea, vaccination was initiated in February 2021, starting with high-risk patients and first-line healthcare workers and gradually expanding to the general public; vaccination for 12th graders was completed in August 2021. Age restrictions were lowered in October, allowing children over the age of 12 years to receive the vaccine.1 However, questions regarding the safety of these COVID-19 vaccines due to a lack of clinical trials have been raised continuously. Several studies have reported rare but severe adverse reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines.23 Some studies have reported the possibility of a causal relationship between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and the risk of myocarditis/pericarditis in adolescent and young adult males.456 In clinical practice, as COVID-19 mRNA vaccination was expanded to the general population, the number of patients presenting to the ED with cardiovascular symptoms increased. Using mobile self-report questionnaires, a survey studies on adverse reactions following administration of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and BNT162b2 vaccine in healthcare workers found that females and younger age groups reported adverse reactions more frequently than males and older age groups.78 As such, there may be differences in adverse reactions by sex and age group. Unlike general adverse reactions, such as fever, chills, myalgia, fatigue, and headache, cardiovascular symptoms require more attention from emergency physicians and more in-depth evaluation for a differential diagnosis considering other serious diseases, as these symptoms could be red flags for potentially life-threatening conditions. This has led to a substantial burden on first-line health care workers in the ED who are already occupied with COVID-19 screening tasks. Therefore, we investigated the clinical characteristics of patients presenting to the ED with cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and analyzed differences in clinical features according to sex and age group.

METHODS

Study design and data collection

The ‘Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act’ of South Korea requires medical staff to report any suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events. In compliance with this Act, we have been reporting adverse events to the COVID-19 Immunization Registry System (IRS) since March 2021. We conducted a retrospective observational study in two hospitals, Incheon and Daejeon, whose EDs serve as regional emergency centers in South Korea. Among the patients who visited the EDs of the two hospitals between June 1, 2021, and October 15, 2021, patients with adverse reactions reported to the COVID-19 IRS were selected. The subjects for this study were included based on cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and were 65 years or younger. The exclusion criteria were as follows: received of a viral vector COVID-19 vaccine, presented with noncardiovascular symptoms, aged more than 65 years, and with incomplete data. The types of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines included Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA-1273). Chest pain/discomfort, dyspnea and palpitation were considered cardiovascular symptoms. Onset day was set to 0 days, if cardiovascular symptoms occurred on the day of vaccination. We collected data on patient sex, age, type of vaccine administered, vaccine dose (first or second), chief complaints, vital signs upon admission, laboratory data, outcomes (discharge or admission), ED length of stay, intravenous hydration and parenteral medication prescribed during ED stay, and final diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed as absolute frequencies, percentages, mean averages, and standard deviations. Age groups were divided into one of the following: 17 to 19 years, 20 to 29 years, 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, 50 to 59 years, and 60 to 65 years. We compared the mean of continuous variables using student’s t-test and compared the distribution of dichotomous variables using the chi-square test with Yates correction for continuity or Fisher’s exact test between male and female groups. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were analyzed using R statistics version 4.1.1 (R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria).

Ethics statement

Institutional Review Board of Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital and Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital approved this study (approval No. DC21RIDI0073 by Daejeon and OC21RIDI0122 by Incheon). Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Two thousand forty-one cases of COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions were reported to the IRS from EDs during the study period. A total of 1,397 patients visited the ED after experiencing adverse COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reactions, and 683 were included in this study (Fig. 1). A total of 426 (62.4%) were female, and the largest proportion of patients was in their 20s (Fig. 2). Both males and females visited the ED more frequently after the first vaccine dose than after the second dose, except for the 17–19 age group (Fig. 3).
Fig. 1

Study population. Viral vector vaccines; AZD1222 [AstraZeneca] and Ad26.COV2.S [Janssen]. mRNA vaccines; BNT162b2 [Pfizer-BioNTech] and mRNA-1273 [Moderna].

Fig. 2

Distribution by age group. Except for the 17-19 age group, there were more females in all age groups (426 [62.4%] vs. 257 [27.6%]). The number of patients in their 20s was the highest for both males and females (38.9% vs. 28.2%), and the number of patients decreased with age (P < 0.001).

Fig. 3

Distribution of patients after the first and second vaccine dose. A total of 70.8% of males and 65.7% of females visited the ED following the first vaccine dose. (A) In males, the number of visits was larger after the first dose than after the second dose in all age groups, except for the 17–19 age group. Males in their 20s visited the ED four time more frequently after the first than after the second (P < 0.001). (B) Females also visited the ED more often after the first dose, except for those in the 17–19 and 60–65 age groups (P = 0.110).

ED = emergency department.

Distribution of patients after the first and second vaccine dose. A total of 70.8% of males and 65.7% of females visited the ED following the first vaccine dose. (A) In males, the number of visits was larger after the first dose than after the second dose in all age groups, except for the 17–19 age group. Males in their 20s visited the ED four time more frequently after the first than after the second (P < 0.001). (B) Females also visited the ED more often after the first dose, except for those in the 17–19 and 60–65 age groups (P = 0.110).

ED = emergency department. The mean age of males was younger than that of females (32.7 ± 12.1 vs. 37 ± 12.5, P < 0.001) (Table 1). Males presented with more chest pain/discomfort than females (81.7% vs. 70%, P = 0.003), while females presented with more dyspnea and palpitation than males. A total of 663 (97.1%) patients were discharged from the ED, and 18 (2.9%) were admitted to the hospital. Although the admission rate was higher in males than in females, there was no significant difference (3.9% vs. 1.9%).
Table 1

Patient characteristics

VariablesTotal, N = 683 (100%)Male, n = 257 (37.6%)Female, n = 426 (62.4%)RatioP value
M : F
Age, mean, yr35.4 ± 12.532.7 ± 12.137 ± 12.5< 0.001
Vaccine type0.397
Pfizer-BioNTech577 (84.4)221 (85.9)356 (83.5)1.02
Moderna106 (15.6)36 (14.1)70 (16.5)0.8
V/S on admission
Systolic blood pressure136.4 ± 18.6137.9 ± 17.6135.4 ± 19.10.075
Diastolic blood pressure86.9 ± 44.789.8 ± 70.685.1 ± 13.90.295
Heart rate90.8 ± 16.489.5 ± 16.491.6 ± 16.40.104
Respiratory rate20.2 ± 7.819.9 ± 1.720.4 ± 9.80.316
Body temperature36.8 ± 0.5536.7 ± 0.536.8 ± 0.530.325
Chief complaints0.003
Chest pain/discomfort508 (74.4)210 (81.7)298 (70.0)1.16
Dyspnea98 (14.3)28 (10.9)70 (16.4)0.66
Palpitation77 (11.3)19 (7.4)58 (13.6)0.54
Underlying disease
Hypertension46 (6.7)18 (2.6)26 (3.8)0.680.761
Diabetes mellitus21 (3.1)12 (1.8)9 (1.3)1.380.099
Mental disorders18 (2.6)4 (1.6)14 (3.3)0.480.262
Thyroid disease15 (2.2)2 (0.8)13 (3.1)0.260.090
GERD14 (2.0)4 (1.6)10 (2.3)0.690.669
Allergic rhinitis13 (1.9)6 (2.3)7 (1.6)1.40.569
Asthma11 (1.6)4 (1.6)7 (1.6)11.000
Arrhythmia10 (1.5)4 (1.6)6 (1.4)1.11.000
Coronary artery disease9 (1.3)6 (2.3)3 (0.7)3.280.087
Discharge outcomes0.179
Discharge663 (97.1)247 (96.1)418 (98.1)0.97
Admission18 (2.9)10 (3.9)8 (1.9)2.05

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%).

GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%). GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease. Cardiac enzyme and NT-proBNP levels were within normal limits for most patients (Table 2). Among 676 patients who underwent an electrocardiogram (EKG) test, 8 (1.2%) had ST-segment changes, and males had more ST-segment changes than females (1.9% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001). Other EKG abnormalities included sinus tachycardia 25 (3.7%), premature ventricular contractions 13 (1.9%), and right bundle branch block 11 (1.6%). During the ED stay, narcotic analgesics were administered more frequently in females than in males (8.2% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.006). The final diagnosis was in the order of nonspecific causes, mental disorders (including hyperventilation, anxiety, and panic disorder), angina and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Fig. 4 shows that most patients reported cardiovascular-adverse reactions within 7 days after vaccination, after both the first and second doses (81.9% and 86.4%).
Table 2

Laboratory findings, therapeutics and diagnosis

VariablesTotal (N = 683)Male (n = 257)Female (n = 426)P value
Laboratory findings
CPK, IU/L115.0 ± 240.5168.1 ± 67.982.9 ± 162.3< 0.001
CK-MB, ng/mL3.8 ± 14.23.2 ± 50.34.2 ± 40.60.717
LDH, IU/L327.3 ± 122.4320.5 ± 137.2331.4 ± 131.80.280
Trop-T, pg/dL9.9 ± 160.019.9 ± 4.13.9 ± 98.40.111
NT-proBNP, pg/mL73.3 ± 114.041.1 ± 440.195.8 ± 346.20.107
EKG finding
ST-segment changes8 (1.2)5 (1.9)3 (0.7)< 0.001
Therapeutics
Intravenous hydration663 (97.1)249 (96.8)414 (97.1)1.000
Narcotic analgesics42 (6.1)7 (2.7)35 (8.2)0.006
Nitroglycerine38 (5.6)14 (5.3)24 (5.5)1.000
NSAIDs30 (4.4)14 (5.3)16 (3.7)0.394
Anti-emetics27 (4.0)5 (1.9)22 (5.0)0.058
Diagnosis< 0.001
Nonspecific causes431 (63.1)150 (58.4)281 (66.0)
Mental disorders82 (12.0)28 (10.8)54 (12.7)
Angina73 (10.7)38 (14.7)35 (8.3)
GERD21 (3.1)6 (2.3)15 (3.5)
Costochondritis18 (2.6)8 (3.1)10 (2.3)
Gastritis9 (1.3)5 (1.9)4 (0.9)
Hypertension9 (1.3)09 (2.1)
Pneumonia5 (0.7)4 (1.4)1 (0.2)
Myocarditis4 (0.5)4 (1.5)0
Coronary artery disease3 (0.4)3 (1.1)0
Other28 (4.1)11 (4.2)17 (4.1)
Length of ED stay, hr2.6 ± 3.32.9 ± 5.02.3 ± 1.310.183

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%). Normal reference values: CPK (0–250 IU/L), CK-MB (0.3–5 ng/mL), LDH (208–450 IU/L), Troponin-T (3–52 pg/dL), NT-proBNP (5–738 pg/mL).

BNP = brain natriuretic peptide, EKG = electrocardiogram, NSAIDs = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease, ED = emergency department.

Fig. 4

Onset days since vaccination by sex. Most patients reported cardiovascular symptoms during the first few days after vaccination. (A) After the first vaccine dose, 68.1% of males and 61.8% of females reported symptoms within 3 days. The latest onset days were 23 and 33 days in males and females, respectively. (B) After the second dose, 77.3% of males and 74.0% of females reported adverse reactions within 3 days. The latest onset days were 30 and 38 days in males and females, respectively.

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (%). Normal reference values: CPK (0–250 IU/L), CK-MB (0.3–5 ng/mL), LDH (208–450 IU/L), Troponin-T (3–52 pg/dL), NT-proBNP (5–738 pg/mL). BNP = brain natriuretic peptide, EKG = electrocardiogram, NSAIDs = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, GERD = gastroesophageal reflux disease, ED = emergency department.

Clinical features of inpatients

Among the 683 patients, 10 (3.9%) males and 8 (1.9%) females were admitted to the hospital. One male patient diagnosed with myocarditis was discharged against medical advice (DAMA). Table 3 shows the detailed clinical features of the inpatients. Myocarditis was diagnosed in four male patients. They were 17, 17, 24 and 49 years old, respectively; had no comorbidities; showed cardiac enzyme elevation but no abnormalities on echocardiography; and mild clinical progression. Three inpatients with myocarditis were discharged within 5 hospital days without any complications. And the one DAMA patient also showed improved symptoms, normalized cardiac enzyme levels, and a decreased amount of pleural effusion at the outpatient follow-up visit 2 days later. Cardiac diseases were diagnosed in 6 males (3 myocarditis, 1 angina, 1 ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], 1 non-STEMI [NSTEMI]) and 2 females (2 heart failure).
Table 3

Clinical characteristics of inpatients

No.SexAgeDiagnosisUnderlying diseaseVaccine doseOnset daysChief complaintsCK-MBTrop-TNT-proBNPEKGEchoCAGIn-ICUIn-hospital
1M17MyocarditisNo2nd3Chest pain 25.11 488 69.5N-SN-SNAHD 3
2M17MyocarditisNo2nd1Chest pain 23.95 239 282N-SN-SNAHD 3
3M18PneumothoraxNo2nd1Chest pain0.945.1217.1N-SN-SNAHD 3
4M18Atypical chest painAllergic rhinitis2nd1Chest pain0.463.617.18N-SN-SNAHD 3
5M18AnginaNo2nd2Chest pain1.016.343.8N-SNAHD 3
6M24MyocarditisNo1st23Chest pain 74.81 2,503 NAST elevationN-SN-SHD 3HD 5
7M46STEMINo1st1Chest pain1.2721.3NAST elevationIschemic insult of LAD/RCA territoryPCI on LAD. RCAHD 2HD 4
8M49PneumoniaNo1st9Dyspnea2.194NAN-SNANAHD 6
9M54DLBCLLiver cirrhosis1st0Dyspnea0.737313N-SNANAHD 8
10M58NSTEMIHypertension2nd26Chest pain1.9321.274.1ST elevationIschemic insult of LAD territoryPCI on LADHD 5HD 6
11F34Ischemic colitisNo1st18Chest pain0.283.71117N-SNANAHD 6
12F35HepatitisNo2nd4Chest pain0.954.773.4N-SNANAHD 4
13F38CholecystitisNo2nd0Chest pain0.453.37NAN-SNANAHD 4
14F39HFBreast cancer1st3Chest pain2.3114.2 2,165 Poor RGlobal hypokinesiaNAHD 9
Pericardial effusionProgression
15F41CostochondritisAdenomyosis1st0Chest pain0.83363.8N-SN-SN-SHD 2
16F53HFBreast cancer1st2Dyspnea2.2818.4 5,529 AFGlobal dysfunctionNAHD 3HD 12
Grave's disease
17F55HepatitisNo1st0Chest pain0.754.1139ST depressionNANAHD 3
18F64PneumoniaNo2nd1Dyspnea1.44372.5N-SNANAHD 8
*M49Myocarditis HF, plerural effusionNo1st0Chest pain1.77 128 1,200 VPCN-SNADAMA

Abnormal findings on blood tests are marked in bold. Data from one DAMA patient with myocarditis are indicated as *.

EKG = electrocardiogram, CAG = cardiac angiography, ICU = intensive care unit, N-S = non-specific, NA = not available, HD = hospital day, STEMI = ST segment elevation myocardial Infarction, LAD = left anterior descending, RCA = right coronary artery, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, DLBCL = diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NSTEMI = non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, HF = heart failure, AF = atrial flutter, VPC = ventricular premature contraction, DAMA = discharge against medical advice.

Abnormal findings on blood tests are marked in bold. Data from one DAMA patient with myocarditis are indicated as *. EKG = electrocardiogram, CAG = cardiac angiography, ICU = intensive care unit, N-S = non-specific, NA = not available, HD = hospital day, STEMI = ST segment elevation myocardial Infarction, LAD = left anterior descending, RCA = right coronary artery, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention, DLBCL = diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NSTEMI = non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, HF = heart failure, AF = atrial flutter, VPC = ventricular premature contraction, DAMA = discharge against medical advice.

DISCUSSION

Large-scale public COVID-19 vaccination campaigns have led to an increasing number of patients presenting to the ED with vaccine-related adverse reactions. In a mobile-based study conducted in South Korea, the most common adverse reactions following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinations (Pfizer-BioNTech) were muscle aches (69.1%), fatigue (65.7%), headache (48.7%), chills (44.2%), and fever (32.1%), while 13.5% reported chest discomfort and palpitation.8 The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency reported that cardiovascular symptoms accounted for 13.6% of all reported COVID-19 mRNA-related adverse reactions.9 However, in this study, 712 (51%) out of 1,397 patients who visited the ED after receiving the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine reported cardiovascular symptoms as adverse reactions. This higher rate is thought to be because this study was conducted in an ED population. Myocarditis has been recognized as a rare complication of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and usually occurs 2 to 3 days after receiving the second vaccine dose. The highest incidence was among young adult and adolescent males, and most cases of myocarditis were mild or moderate in severity.3510 In this study, four males were diagnosed with myocarditis. They were 17, 17, 24 and 49 years old, respectively; had elevated cardiac enzyme levels, nonspecific EKG findings (except for the 24-year-old patient) and no abnormalities on echocardiography; two out of the four patients developed symptoms after the second dose; and symptom onset was 0, 1, 3, and 23 days after vaccination, respectively. One study investigated adverse reactions until 21 and 30 days following the first and second doses, respectively.3 Another study analyzed adverse reactions up to 42 days after the first dose.11 In this study, the patient who developed symptoms on the 23rd day after vaccination had ST elevation on his EKG, even though normal echocardiographic findings were observed. He underwent coronary angiography, which confirmed normal findings. In this patient with late onset, COVID-19 vaccination could not be excluded as a cause of myocarditis. All four cases of myocarditis had mild clinical progression, so cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not needed to confirm myocarditis. Myocarditis must be considered, especially in young adults and adolescents presenting to the ED with cardiovascular symptoms following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, and invasive coronary angiography must be carefully considered. Myocarditis/pericarditis is a rare disease commonly caused by viral infection, including SARS-CoV-2 infection.12 The exact incidence rate of myocarditis is unknown due to difficulty in diagnosis.121314 Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of myocarditis but is rarely performed due to the high-risk nature of the procedure. Recent advancements in cardiac MRI technology are associated with the increased annual incidence of myocarditis.1516 The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established a myocarditis case definition by adding cardiac MRI findings to Sagar's classification system.17 Following the CDC definition, four cases of myocarditis in this study were classified as probable myocarditis, as the patients did not undergo EMB or cardiac MRI. The final diagnoses included mental disorders (panic disorder, anxiety, or hyperventilation), GERD, costochondritis, and gastritis. These diseases can manifest as symptoms similar to cardiovascular symptoms, so a differential diagnosis is required. Additionally, two admitted males who visited the ED for vaccine adverse reactions were ultimately diagnosed with myocardial infarction. This suggests that emergency physicians must consider medical diseases other than adverse vaccine reactions. In this study, prescriptions for nitroglycerine and analgesics were low. Considering that there were many nonspecific causes in the final diagnosis, it is thought that most patients had pain/discomfort that did not require pain control, although this is a limited interpretation of retrospective studies. In females, more narcotic medications were administered for pain relief than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. This requires further research, utilizing a tool such as a pain score, in the future. The 17–19 age group displayed different characteristics compared to the other age groups. They showed that there were more males than females, visited the ED more frequently after the second dose than after first dose, and higher diagnostic rates of myocarditis. These results were similar to those of other studies of myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.31011 There were more females than males in this study, similar to other studies on vaccine adverse reactions.78 One study reported that female sex was the main covariable, although a clear explanation of such an observation has not been provided.18 Limitations in this study are its retrospective nature and small sample size. This study was performed in two hospitals; therefore, selection bias might have occurred. In addition, only patients between 17–19 years old were included in this study due to government age restrictions for vaccination; therefore, the results do not represent all teenagers. The results of vaccine types should be interpreted with caution, as the vaccination rates and administered vaccine types were different for each age group during this study period. There are no studies on patients presenting to the ED with cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccination. Therefore, this study can provide a guide for decision-making and patient disposition within the ED. In addition, this study can serve as a valuable reference for the comparison of adolescents and adults, following the South Korean government's decision to expand vaccinations to those 12 years of age or older. In conclusion, the majority of patients with cardiovascular adverse reactions after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination were female, and visited the ED more frequently after the first vaccine dose. The number of patients in their 20s was the highest; most of patients were discharged from the ED; the admission rate was higher in males; and all four cases of myocarditis were diagnosed in males and showed mild clinical progression.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Viral Myocarditis-Incidence, Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Megan Olejniczak; Matthew Schwartz; Elizabeth Webber; Andrew Shaffer; Tjorvi E Perry
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Adverse reactions to influenza vaccine in elderly people: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  T M Govaert; G J Dinant; K Aretz; N Masurel; M J Sprenger; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-16

3.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Adverse Reactions Following the First Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine and BNT162b2 Vaccine for Healthcare Workers in South Korea.

Authors:  Seongman Bae; Yun Woo Lee; So Yun Lim; Ji Hyang Lee; Joon Seo Lim; Sojeong Lee; Soyeon Park; Sun Kyung Kim; Young Ju Lim; Eun Ok Kim; Jiwon Jung; Hyouk Soo Kwon; Tae Bum Kim; Sung Han Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine against Covid-19 in Israel.

Authors:  Dror Mevorach; Emilia Anis; Noa Cedar; Michal Bromberg; Eric J Haas; Eyal Nadir; Sharon Olsha-Castell; Dana Arad; Tal Hasin; Nir Levi; Rabea Asleh; Offer Amir; Karen Meir; Dotan Cohen; Rita Dichtiar; Deborah Novick; Yael Hershkovitz; Ron Dagan; Iris Leitersdorf; Ronen Ben-Ami; Ian Miskin; Walid Saliba; Khitam Muhsen; Yehezkel Levi; Manfred S Green; Lital Keinan-Boker; Sharon Alroy-Preis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Myocarditis after Covid-19 Vaccination in a Large Health Care Organization.

Authors:  Guy Witberg; Noam Barda; Sara Hoss; Ilan Richter; Maya Wiessman; Yaron Aviv; Tzlil Grinberg; Oren Auster; Noa Dagan; Ran D Balicer; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Adverse Reactions of the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers in Korea.

Authors:  Yun Woo Lee; So Yun Lim; Ji Hyang Lee; Joon Seo Lim; Miseo Kim; Seonhee Kwon; Jiyeon Joo; Sun Hee Kwak; Eun Ok Kim; Jiwon Jung; Hyouk Soo Kwon; Tae Bum Kim; Sung Han Kim; Seongman Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Occurrence and Features of Childhood Myocarditis: A Nationwide Study in Finland.

Authors:  Anita Arola; Essi Pikkarainen; Jussi Ot Sipilä; Jouni Pykäri; Päivi Rautava; Ville Kytö
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines.

Authors:  Biykem Bozkurt; Ishan Kamat; Peter J Hotez
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe and the USA and of the scientific literature.

Authors:  Samantha Lane; Alison Yeomans; Saad Shakir
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Potential Immunologic and Integrative Methods to Enhance Vaccine Safety.

Authors:  Alan M Dattner
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.