Literature DB >> 35257274

The Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Speech Is Correlated with the Ability to Listen in Modulated Noise.

Robin Gransier1, Astrid van Wieringen2, Jan Wouters2.   

Abstract

Speech perception in difficult listening conditions depends highly on the temporal processing ability of the auditory pathway. In the present study, we investigate the inter-subject variability of young normal-hearing listeners in the identification of time-compressed speech and how the ability to identify time-compressed speech, as assessed by the speech reception threshold (SRTrate: the speech rate at which 50% of the speech is perceived correctly) is associated with the ability to identify speech in unmodulated (SRTunmod) and modulated noise (SRTmod). These tasks are highly dependent on the temporal processing abilities of the auditory pathway. We observed a large inter-subject variability in the SRTrate and found that it is significantly correlated with the SRT when listening to unmodulated and modulated noise. Furthermore, we found that listeners who are better at perceiving speech at high rates are better in listening to speech in modulated noise. This effect persisted even when controlling for their ability to perceive speech in unmodulated noise. In addition, we also found that an increase in speech rate from 2.7 to 6.6 syllables per second resulted in a reduction in glimpsing of 5.3 dB when listening to speech in a 4-Hz amplitude-modulated masker, even though speech in quiet was 100% intelligible at both rates. These results indicate that the ability of young normal-hearing individuals to efficiently process temporal features of speech is an imperative factor when listening to speech in difficult listening situations.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Normal-hearing listeners; Speech in noise; Speech perception; Time-compressed speech

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257274      PMCID: PMC9085996          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00832-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  58 in total

1.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Time-compression thresholds for Mandarin sentences in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Qinglin Meng; Xianren Wang; Yuexin Cai; Fanhui Kong; Alexa Nadezhda Buck; Guangzheng Yu; Nengheng Zheng; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Intelligibility of time-compressed speech: the effect of uniform versus non-uniform time-compression algorithms.

Authors:  Anne Schlueter; Ulrike Lemke; Birger Kollmeier; Inga Holube
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 9.  Syllabic (∼2-5 Hz) and fluctuation (∼1-10 Hz) ranges in speech and auditory processing.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Training of ultra-fast speech comprehension induces functional reorganization of the central-visual system in late-blind humans.

Authors:  Susanne Dietrich; Ingo Hertrich; Hermann Ackermann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.