Literature DB >> 35257142

Author response to: Global surgery education in Europe: a landscape analysis.

Lotta Velin1, Adriana C Panayi2,3, Iris Lebbe4, Emmanuelle Koehl5, Gauthier Willemse5, Dominique Vervoort4,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35257142      PMCID: PMC8902322          DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJS Open        ISSN: 2474-9842


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor We read the comment from Dr Bandyopadhyay, questioning our findings that show only 16 global surgery centres in Europe, with great interest[1]. We thank the author for providing us with an opportunity to expand on the limitations of our analysis and acknowledge that more institutions, such as those presented by the author, are involved in surgical care delivery in variable-resource contexts. Our analysis focused exclusively on academic global surgery initiatives and educational programmes directly associated with medical schools. Although non-governmental organizations such as KidsOR (founded in Scotland) and the Global Surgery Foundation (located in Switzerland), and student initiatives such as InciSioN chapters, were not captured by our analysis, they are central to the European global surgery landscape. Similarly, although not hosting traditional institution-based learning, subregional initiatives such as the Nordic Network for Global Surgery and Anesthesia in the Nordic countries and the German Society for Global Surgery in Germany facilitate research and educational collaborations between institutions and individuals. We excluded non-academic initiatives for multiple reasons. First, many informal ad hoc opportunities, such as student chapters or projects based on personal partnerships, may not be described online, and were excluded to ensure consistency. Second, most hospitals have some individuals working clinically abroad (e.g. annual ‘missions’) with some hospitals even having long-term relationships established. These initiatives, however, are rarely established at the university level, as reflected in our analysis. Third, trainees often have limited opportunities to meaningfully participate in clinical initiatives abroad which are not based on institutional collaborations. Many, albeit certainly not all, of these fly-in ‘missions’ are marked by power asymmetries contradicting the spirit of equity emphasized in the definition of global surgery. Overall, our focus on academic initiatives sought to serve as a proxy for visibility and accessibility for trainees to start to engage as future global surgery leaders.
  1 in total

1.  Global surgery education in Europe: a landscape analysis.

Authors:  Lotta Velin; Adriana C Panayi; Iris Lebbe; Emmanuelle Koehl; Gauthier Willemse; Dominique Vervoort
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.