Literature DB >> 35257069

A Diverse Spectrum of Immune Complex- and Complement-Mediated Kidney Diseases Is Associated With Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Nicole K Andeen1, Shahad Abdulameer2, Vivek Charu3, Jonathan E Zuckerman4, Megan Troxell3, Neeraja Kambham3, Charles E Alpers2, Behzad Najafian2, Roberto F Nicosia2, Kelly D Smith2, Vanderlene L Kung1, Rupali S Avasare5, Anusha Vallurupalli6, J Ashley Jefferson7, Douglas Hecox8, Leah Swetnam9, Michifumi Yamashita10, Mercury Lin10, Mei Lin Bissonnette11, Shreeram Akilesh2, Jean Hou10.   

Abstract

Introduction: There are limited reports on kidney biopsy findings in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
Methods: We initiated a multi-institutional, retrospective review of kidney biopsy findings in patients with active and treated MCL.
Results: A total of 30 patients with MCL and kidney biopsies were identified, with a median age of 67 (range 48-87) years, 73% of whom were men. A total of 20 patients had active MCL at the time of biopsy, of whom 14 (70%) presented with acute kidney injury (AKI), proteinuria and/or hematuria, and biopsy findings potentially attributable to lymphoma. Of the 14, 11 had immune complex (IC) or complement-mediated (C3) disease including proliferative glomerulonephritis (GN) with monotypic Ig deposits (PGNMID [2]), C3GN, (2), secondary membranous nephropathy (MN [3]), tubular basement membrane (TBM) deposits (2), and modest lupus-like GN (2). Lymphomatous infiltration was present in 8 of the 20 patients, 5 with coincident IC or C3 lesions. A total of 6 patients with available follow-up were treated for MCL, all with clinical remission of GN (2 PGNMID, 2 C3GN, and 2 MN).
Conclusion: MCL is associated with diverse monoclonal and polyclonal glomerular and extra-glomerular IC and C3 disease. For patients with active MCL and kidney dysfunction requiring biopsy, 70% had findings due or potentially due to lymphoma, including 55% with IC or C3 disease and 40% had lymphomatous kidney infiltration. IC and C3GN in the setting of active MCL was responsive to lymphoma-directed therapy.
© 2021 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MGRS; Mantle cell lymphoma; glomerulonephritis; kidney biopsy; lymphoma; renal pathology

Year:  2021        PMID: 35257069      PMCID: PMC8897291          DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int Rep        ISSN: 2468-0249


The increasing recognition of kidney disease in patients with lymphoproliferative and plasma cell disorders has led to a recent surge of interest in defining clinicopathologic correlates of disease, particularly for monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Less has been published about MCL which is an aggressive subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is characterized by a recurrent genetic translocation, t(11;14), involving the gene encoding cyclin D1 in approximately 85% of cases. MCL-associated kidney dysfunction has been documented only in case reports, with authors reporting polyclonal IC mediated GN,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 C3GN,, and pauci-immune crescentic GN, as well as frequent renal infiltration by lymphoma.17, 18, 19,21, 22, 23, 24,, In this study, we initiated a multi-institutional retrospective review to describe the clinicopathologic spectrum of MCL-associated kidney injury, treatment, and outcomes.

Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of The University of British Columbia, University of Washington, Oregon Health & Science University, Stanford University, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, and University of Los Angeles, and adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki. Native kidney pathology databases were searched from 2000 through 2020 for the term “mantle cell lymphoma,” identifying 30 patients: 28 patients with kidney biopsies (2 with repeat biopsies) and 2 autopsy cases. MCL was considered active if it was untreated, currently undergoing treatment, or if it had relapsed or was resistant to therapy. MCL was considered treated if the patient had undergone treatment and was reported to be in remission. Additional specifics on hematologic response were not collected. Biopsies had standard pathologic workup, including light microscopic evaluation with Jones methenamine silver, periodic acid–Schiff, hematoxylin and eosin, and trichrome stains. For immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy, frozen tissue was stained with antibodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, fibrin/fibrinogen, κ light chain, lambda light chain, and albumin. IgG subclass staining was performed in 3 cases (case numbers [#]1, #2, and #8); pronase digestion paraffin IF was performed in 2 (cases #2 and #17). Phospholipase A2 receptor staining was performed in 2 cases (case #8 and #9); tissue testing for additional MN associated antigens was performed in 2 cases (case #8 and #9). Serum evaluation for alternative complement pathway abnormalities was not performed. Characterization of the interstitial inflammatory infiltrate was performed by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. Electron microscopy was performed on all available biopsies. Clinical history was obtained through discussion with nephrologists and review of the medical record whenever available. Renal response criteria were adapted from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes response criteria for lupus nephritis: reduction in proteinuria to <0.5 g/g and stabilization or improvement in kidney function.

Results

In total, 30 patients with MCL and relevant kidney pathology were identified (30 biopsies from 28 patients, plus 2 autopsies), with a median age of 67 (range 48–87) years, 73% of whom were men (detailed case information provided in Supplementary Material, Table S1). These patients were subsequently categorized into 2 main groups (Figure 1). One group contained patients with active MCL (n = 20) and kidney dysfunction; these patients were subdivided into those with renal abnormalities due or potentially due to MCL (n =14) and those of other or uncertain etiologies (n = 6). A second group (n = 10) was comprised of patients with treated MCL who were in remission at time of biopsy and had biopsy findings either attributable to MCL-related treatments or other causes.
Figure 1

Study schema, patients with kidney pathology and mantle cell lymphoma. ATN, acute tubular necrosis; BMT, bone marrow transplant; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; GS, glomerulosclerosis; GVHD, graft versus host disease; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MN, membranous nephropathy; PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monotypic Ig deposits; TBM, tubular basement membrane.

Study schema, patients with kidney pathology and mantle cell lymphoma. ATN, acute tubular necrosis; BMT, bone marrow transplant; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; GS, glomerulosclerosis; GVHD, graft versus host disease; HCV, hepatitis C virus; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MN, membranous nephropathy; PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monotypic Ig deposits; TBM, tubular basement membrane.

Kidney Biopsies and Outcomes in Patients With IC or C3 Disease Associated With MCL

A total of 20 patients had active MCL at the time of kidney tissue evaluation (19 with biopsies, 1 autopsy), at least 11 of whom (55%) had glomerular and/or extra-glomerular IC or C3 disease (Table 1, cases #1–#11). These 11 patients had a median age of 68 (range 59–87) years, were predominantly men (82%), and presented with AKI (64%), proteinuria (82%, nephrotic range in 36%), and/or hematuria (36%). Comorbid conditions included hypertension (54%) and/or diabetes (27%); 4 had positive autoimmune serologies but none had defined autoimmune disease. No patient had hepatitis B or C virus, HIV, SARS-CoV-2, or other chronic viral and/or bacterial infections. Two patients had other solid-organ malignancies which had been previously treated (case #1 and #5). A total of 4 patients had a detectable paraprotein on serum (serum protein electrophoresis [SPEP]) or urine protein electrophoresis. Overall, 6 patients with IC or C3GN had available follow-up and were treated for MCL, all with clinical remission of GN.
Table 1

Patients with active mantle cell lymphoma and renal biopsy finding attributable to MCL (14 patients, 11 with immune complex or complement-mediated disease)

CaseAge sexBx indicationSummary of laboratoriesKidney Bx diagnosisLight microscopyIFEM deposit locationFollow-up
166 FAKI, nephrotic proteinuria, hematuriaLow C4, cryo neg, paraprotein negPGNMIDMPGN with diffuse crescentsIgG3 κ (2+), C3 (3+), C1q (2-3+)Mes, subendoMCL treated, GN in remission at 7 months
265MAKI, nephrotic syndrome, hematuriaParaprotein pos (λ), discordant from glomerular depositsPGNMIDMesangial, endocapillary proliferative, focal crescentsIgG3 κ (3+), C3 (3+), C1q (2-3+)Mes, subendo, rare subepiMCL treated, GN in remission at 3 months
3A68MAKI, proteinuria, hematuriaSerologies and paraprotein negC3 dominant GNMesangial proliferativeC3 (3+)Mes, rare subepiPersisted on repeat bx at 6 months, then MCL treated and GN in remission at 6 years
3BEdema, decreased urine outputC3GNMesangial proliferativeC3 (3+), C1q (tr-1+)Mes, rare subepi
461MAKI, subnephrotic proteinuria, hematuriaParaprotein pos (λ), discordant from lymphoma (κ)C3GN,Lymphoma infiltrationMesangial proliferativeC3 (4+), IgG (2+), k (2+), l (2+), C1q (1-2+)MesMCL treated, GN in remission at 28 months
587MAKI, subnephrotic proteinuria, hematuriaSerologies and paraprotein negModest lupus-like GN, AINMesangial proliferative, mild AINC3 (2-3+), C1q (2+), IgG (tr-1+), k (tr-1+), l (tr-1+)Mes, paramesUnknown
676MAKIANA, dsDNA pos, no systemic lupus symptomsModest lupus-like GN,Lymphoma infiltrationMesangial proliferative, duplicated GBMIgG, IgM, k, l, C3, C1q (all 1+)Mes, subendo, rare TRIUnknown
773MProgressive CKD subnephrotic proteinuriaRF pos, paraprotein negMPGN, Lymphoma infiltrationMPGNNo glomeruli availableMes, subendo, few subepiUnknown
866MNephrotic syndromeSerologies and paraprotein negMN, PLA2R-, THSD7A+membranousIgG (4+), k (2+), l (3+), C3 (3+)Global subepi, rare mesUnknown
959FNephrotic syndromeANA pos, C3 lowMN, PLA2R-, NELL1-Lymphoma infiltrationmembranousIgG (3+), k (2+), l (3+), C3 (3+), with TBM depositsIrregularly distributed subepi, TBMMCL treated, GN in remission at 5 years
1069MProgressive CKD, subnephrotic proteinuriaANA, dsDNA, pANCA, RNP, SSA, and paraprotein posMN, segmental, with TBM depositsLymphoma infiltrationmembranousIgG (2+), k, l, C3, C1q (all 1-2+), with chunky TBM depositsSubepi, subendo, mes, TBMMCL treated, GN in remission at 17 months
1177MAKIParaprotein posTBM deposits, ATIATI, normal glomeruliCoarse TBM staining for IgG, k, l, C3Fine granular TBMUnknown
1272FAKIHx Sjogren’s, ANA, paraprotein+Lymphoma infiltration, arterionephrosclerosisNormal glomeruliNegativeNegativeUnknown
1367FAKIUnknownLymphoma infiltration, ATIATI, normal glomeruliNegativeNegativeUnknown
1474MAKI (autopsy)Blood cultures posLymphoma infiltration, diabetic nephropathyNodular mesangial sclerosisNot performedNot performed(Autopsy)

AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; AKI, acute kidney injury; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ATI, acute tubular injury; Bx, biopsy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; Cryo, cryoglobulin; dsDNA, double stranded DNA; EM, electron microscopy; F, female; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; Hx, history; IF, immunofluorescence; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; Mes, mesangial; MN, membranous nephropathy; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; Neg, negative; NELL1, neural epidermal growth factor-like 1; pANCA, p-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody; PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal Ig deposits; PLA2R, phospholipase A2 receptor; Pos, positive; RF, rheumatoid factor; RNP, ribonucleoprotein; SSA, Sjogren syndrome A; Subendo, subendothelial; Subepi, subepithelial; TBM: tubular basement membrane; THSD7A, thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 7A; TRI, tubuloreticular inclusions.

Patients with active mantle cell lymphoma and renal biopsy finding attributable to MCL (14 patients, 11 with immune complex or complement-mediated disease) AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; AKI, acute kidney injury; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ATI, acute tubular injury; Bx, biopsy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; Cryo, cryoglobulin; dsDNA, double stranded DNA; EM, electron microscopy; F, female; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; Hx, history; IF, immunofluorescence; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; Mes, mesangial; MN, membranous nephropathy; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; Neg, negative; NELL1, neural epidermal growth factor-like 1; pANCA, p-antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody; PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal Ig deposits; PLA2R, phospholipase A2 receptor; Pos, positive; RF, rheumatoid factor; RNP, ribonucleoprotein; SSA, Sjogren syndrome A; Subendo, subendothelial; Subepi, subepithelial; TBM: tubular basement membrane; THSD7A, thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 7A; TRI, tubuloreticular inclusions. Patterns of IC disease were diverse and consisted of PGNMID (2 patients; Figure 2a-c), C3GN (2 patients; Figure 3a-f), secondary MN (3 patients; Figure 4a-d), and/or polyclonal TBM deposits (2 patients; Figure 4b), and modest lupus-like GN (2 patients). Lymphomatous infiltration was present in 8 patients and often diffuse; 5 also had concurrent IC or C3 lesions. Notably, in most patients, the IC lesions were polyclonal with only 2 PGNMID. In one of these (case #1), both the lymphoma and glomerular immune deposits demonstrated κ light chain restriction, although no circulating paraprotein was identified. In the other PGNMID (case #2), there was discordant staining, i.e. a lambda light chain restricted MCL accompanied by a small IgG-λ paraprotein spike on SPEP and urine protein electrophoresis, but glomerular ICs which stained for IgG3 κ. For patient #1, MCL was treated with rituximab, bendamustine, and prednisone with subsequent remission of both the MCL and GN (serum creatinine [Cr] 1.4 mg/dl from 4.6 mg/dl, and proteinuria 0.17 g/g from >10 g/g at presentation), maintained after 7 months of follow-up. For patient #2, treatment of MCL with rituximab and bendamustine resulted in remission of GN at 3 months (Cr 2.1 mg/dl from 4.8 mg/dl, and proteinuria 0.9 g/g from 9 g/g), but he died 5 months after kidney biopsy.
Figure 2

PGNMID (case #1), with (a) proliferative glomerulonephritis (Jones ×200), (b) granular mesangial and peripheral capillary wall immune deposits which stain for IgG3 and κ light chain by immunofluorescence, and (c) mesangial and subendothelial immune deposits without substructural organization by electron microscopy (direct magnification ×2900). PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monotypic Ig deposits.

Figure 3

C3GN (case #4), with (a) subtle eosinophilic, predominantly mesangial immune deposits (arrows, Jones ×400), (b) tubulointerstitial lymphomatous infiltration (Jones ×100) composed of (c) κ restricted B-cells with t(11;14) and immunophenotypic features characteristic of mantle cell lymphoma (×200, κ ISH, with negative λ ISH in upper right inset). (d) Glomeruli had granular mesangial and segmental peripheral capillary wall staining for C3, with (e) a lesser degree of predominantly mesangial staining for polyclonal IgG and C1q and (f) mesangial immune deposits (direct magnification ×2900). GN, glomerulonephritis; ISH, in situ hybridization.

Figure 4

Diffuse parenchymal infiltration by (a) cyclin D1-positive mantle cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry (×200), (b) granular to chunky tubular basement membrane immune deposits composed of polyclonal IgG and complement, with (c) segmental peripheral capillary wall, mesangial, and Bowman’s capsule staining for polyclonal IgG and complement by immunofluorescence and (d) corresponding predominantly subepithelial immune deposits by electron microscopy (direct magnification ×4800).

PGNMID (case #1), with (a) proliferative glomerulonephritis (Jones ×200), (b) granular mesangial and peripheral capillary wall immune deposits which stain for IgG3 and κ light chain by immunofluorescence, and (c) mesangial and subendothelial immune deposits without substructural organization by electron microscopy (direct magnification ×2900). PGNMID, proliferative glomerulonephritis with monotypic Ig deposits. C3GN (case #4), with (a) subtle eosinophilic, predominantly mesangial immune deposits (arrows, Jones ×400), (b) tubulointerstitial lymphomatous infiltration (Jones ×100) composed of (c) κ restricted B-cells with t(11;14) and immunophenotypic features characteristic of mantle cell lymphoma (×200, κ ISH, with negative λ ISH in upper right inset). (d) Glomeruli had granular mesangial and segmental peripheral capillary wall staining for C3, with (e) a lesser degree of predominantly mesangial staining for polyclonal IgG and C1q and (f) mesangial immune deposits (direct magnification ×2900). GN, glomerulonephritis; ISH, in situ hybridization. Diffuse parenchymal infiltration by (a) cyclin D1-positive mantle cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry (×200), (b) granular to chunky tubular basement membrane immune deposits composed of polyclonal IgG and complement, with (c) segmental peripheral capillary wall, mesangial, and Bowman’s capsule staining for polyclonal IgG and complement by immunofluorescence and (d) corresponding predominantly subepithelial immune deposits by electron microscopy (direct magnification ×4800). The 2 cases of C3 dominant GN met published criteria for C3GN (IF staining for C3 which was ≥2+ greater than any other immune reactant)., One patient (case #3A) without an identified paraprotein had C3-only deposits in a mesangial and rare subepithelial distribution and mild diabetic glomerulopathy. Although the findings were initially favored to represent postinfectious GN, the changes persisted on repeat biopsy 6 months later (case #3B) and no source of infection was ever identified. The second (case #4) had a history of pneumonia 3 months before kidney biopsy, and an IgM-λ paraprotein on SPEP which was discrepant from the κ light chain restriction of the MCL. Patient #3 began treatment for MCL after the second kidney biopsy, and after 6 years of follow-up, both MCL and GN had resolved (Cr 1.5 from 7.4 mg/dl at presentation). Patient #4 was treated for MCL with rituximab and bendamustine with rapid resolution of the GN; at 28 months of follow-up, both MCL and GN remained in remission (Cr 1.2 mg/dl from 3.2 mg/dl, no hematuria or proteinuria, from 3.2 g/g at diagnosis). A total of 3 patients had polyclonal or unclassified IC disease. This included 2 (case #5 and #6) mesangial proliferative GNs with moderate staining for polyclonal IgG, C3, and C1q; one of which was in a patient with new positive antinuclear antibody and antidouble stranded DNA and lymphomatous kidney infiltration, but had neither systemic symptoms nor preceding diagnosis of lupus. One patient (case #7) had a membranoproliferative GN and lymphomatous infiltration but no frozen tissue for IF characterization of deposits and preceded use of pronase-digested paraffin IF. Two of 3 patients with secondary MN (cases #8, #9, and #10) presented with nephrotic syndrome. Two (case #9 and #10) had a positive antinuclear antibody, one of whom also had positive p- antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody, antidouble stranded DNA, antiribonucleoprotein, Sjogren Syndrome A, and urine protein electrophoresis (case #10); none had non-MCL malignancies. Immune deposits were composed of polyclonal IgG in a segmental subepithelial (1), mesangial (1), and subendothelial (2) distribution. Both tested cases were negative for phospholipase A2 receptor; one was also negative for neural epidermal growth factor-like 1, and the other was positive for thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 7A (case #8). Follow-up was available in 2 patients (case #9 and #10), both of whom were treated with rituximab and subsequent bone marrow transplant, with clinical resolution of GN (case #9: Cr stable at 1.1 mg/dl with no proteinuria at 5 years, and case #10: Cr 1.64 mg/dl from 3.2 mg/dl, proteinuria 0.26 g/g from 2.5 g/g at 17 months). Diffuse granular TBM immune deposits composed of polyclonal IgG were present in 2 (case #10 and #11), one of which also had segmental MN (case #10). A definitive etiology for the TBM immune deposits was not identified in either case; patients had normal complement levels, no established autoimmune disease or infection, and biopsies lacked other features of IgG4-related disease. Testing for anti-low density lipoprotein receptor related protein 2 (megalin)/anti-brush border antibody disease was not performed, and this possibility cannot be excluded. In addition to 11 patients with IC or C3 disease associated with MCL, 3 of 20 patients with active MCL had renal dysfunction considered likely related to lymphomatous infiltration of the kidney and/or underlying disease (Table 1, case #12–#14). These 3 patients presented with AKI; 1 had pre-existing Sjogren syndrome and a positive SPEP, and 1 had diabetes, hypertension, and sepsis from endocarditis (autopsy). Kidney histology revealed infiltration by MCL, with the additional finding of arterionephrosclerosis (case #12), acute tubular injury (case #13), and diabetic nodular mesangial sclerosis (case #14).

Kidney Biopsies and Outcomes in Patients With Active MCL and Kidney Dysfunction of Uncertain or Nonlymphoma Etiologies

A total of 6 of 20 patients (30%) with active MCL and kidney dysfunction had biopsy findings of uncertain or nonlymphoma etiologies (Figure 1 and Table 2). All had AKI; proteinuria (67%) and hematuria (83%) were common, but none had a circulating paraprotein or autoimmune disease. Two patients had glomerular IC disease; 1 (case #15) had a history of long-term smoking and a leg ulcer treated with antibiotics, and biopsy demonstrated features of bacterial infection related GN superimposed on idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis; another (case #16) had a modest IC GN favored due to hepatitis C virus. Both patients had active untreated MCL, and potential contribution of lymphoma to the GN is uncertain. One patient (case #17) had a recent diagnosis of MCL undergoing rituximab treatment, with neutropenic fever, hypocomplementemia, AKI, and subnephrotic proteinuria but no identifiable infection. Kidney biopsy demonstrated an unusual mesangial proliferative glomerulopathy without detectable ICs by routine or paraffin IF or electron microscopy. No other cause was identified for the glomerulopathy (no history of diabetes, smoking, or hypertension), and at 2.5 years of follow-up, MCL was in remission and renal function and proteinuria had improved (Cr 1.4 mg/dl from 2.8 mg/dl, with minimal proteinuria). The etiology of this mesangial proliferative glomerulopathy and its relationship to MCL are uncertain; it is possible that concurrent rituximab treatment in this patient altered biopsy findings. A total of 3 patients had interstitial nephritis (case #18–#20); one of them presented with a rash consistent with lymphoma cutis and had recently received i.v. contrast (case #18). Potential nephrotoxic agents were not identified in the other 2 cases. All were receiving rituximab and bendamustine for MCL, neither of which are generally associated with hypersensitivity interstitial nephritis.
Table 2

Patients with active MCL at time of renal biopsy, kidney biopsy findings of uncertain etiology or favored due to other diseases (6 patients)

CaseAge sexMCL statusOther historyBx indicationKidney Bx diagnosisFollow-up
1563MActive, untreatedLong-term smoking, leg ulcer. No DMAKI, proteinuriaFavor infection related GN, and idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosisTreatment and kidney outcome not available. Active lymphoma 4 yr after bx
1657MActive, untreatedHCV infectionAKI, subnephrotic proteinuria, hematuriaModest immune complex GN (IgM, C3 with focal crescent and FSGS) favor related to HCV, mild AINTreated with steroids, no improvement in renal function
1765MActive, on rituximabNeutropenic fever. No DM, smoking, or HTNAKI, subnephrotic proteinuriaMesangial proliferative glomerulopathy of uncertain etiology, no immune depositsMCL treated, glomerulopathy in remission at 2.5 yr
1880FActive, on rituximab, bendamustineAllopurinol, IV contrastAKI, subnephrotic proteinuria rashAIN with eosinophilsMCL treated, death within 1 yr of biopsy
1982MActive, on rituximab, bendamustineUnknownAKI, eosinophiliaMild AINMCL treated, outcome not available
2065MPreceded by 2 yr, on rituximab and bendamustineHTNAKI, hematuriaMild chronic interstitial nephritisMCL treated, normal renal function at 5.5 yr

AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; AKI, acute kidney injury; Bx, biopsy; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HTN, hypertension; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.

Patients with active MCL at time of renal biopsy, kidney biopsy findings of uncertain etiology or favored due to other diseases (6 patients) AIN, acute interstitial nephritis; AKI, acute kidney injury; Bx, biopsy; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN, glomerulonephritis; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HTN, hypertension; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma.

Kidney Biopsies in Patients With MCL in Remission and Kidney Dysfunction

A total of 10 patients had significant kidney pathology while MCL was in remission; these findings were attributed to various underlying diseases (Figure 1 and Supplementary Material, Table S1). All of these patients had been treated with chemotherapy, and 3 received stem cell transplant. One biopsy demonstrated thrombotic microangiopathy in the setting of bone marrow transplant and chronic graft versus host disease. The other 9 had kidney dysfunction with no likely causal relationship to MCL.

Discussion

In this study, we present the spectrum of renal biopsy findings in the largest cohort of patients with MCL to date. Our findings indicate that in patients with active MCL and kidney dysfunction who underwent renal biopsy, 70% had findings that were due or potentially due to lymphoma. Diverse patterns of polyclonal or monoclonal IC disease or C3GN were seen in 55%; 40% had renal parenchymal lymphomatous infiltration. IC and C3GN in the setting of active MCL were responsive to lymphoma-directed therapy. The overall findings of this clinicopathologic cohort are well-supported by previous case reports of patients with MCL and kidney biopsies (summarized in Table 3). Of 15 previously reported cases of MCL-associated kidney injury, 9 had a polyclonal IC mediated GN,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 usually with deposition of IgG, IgM, C3, and C1q. Two had C3GN,, 1 had a pauci-IC crescentic GN, 9 had direct parenchymal infiltration by MCL,17, 18, 19,21, 22, 23, 24,, and 2 had a proliferative GN without further available description of IC findings., These case reports span 20 years and include a variety of lymphoma treatment approaches. Although establishing causality is difficult, in all of these previously reported cases, kidney dysfunction improved or normalized with treatment of lymphoma. Although our cohort is limited by having clinical follow-up in only 6 of 11 patients with IC or C3GN (2 with PGNMID, 2 with C3GN, and 2 with secondary MN) improvement of kidney disease with lymphoma-directed therapy is consistent with previous studies. We also describe monoclonal IC disease (PGNMID), secondary MN, and TBM immune deposits, which to our knowledge, have not previously been reported in association with MCL.
Table 3

Previously reported cases of patients with MCL and kidney biopsies

Age, sexMCL statusBiopsy indicationLaboratory evaluationKidney biopsyInterventionFollow-upReference
Polyclonal immune complex disease
68MMCL diagnosed 5 months laterAKI (Cr 11.8 mg/dl)ANA, ANCA, anti-GBM, cryoglobulin, SPEP, C3 and C4, ASO, negative/normalProliferative GN with IgG, C3MCL treated with chlorambucin and prednisoloneImproved: Cr 2.49 mg/dl at 8 mo. Lymphoma responded31
68MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 4.8 mg/dl), 4+ proteinuriaLow C3. ANA, ANCA, HIV, hepatitis, C4 normalMPGN with polyclonal IgG, IgMMCL treated with rituximab and hyper CVADImproved: Cr 0.5 mg/dl, 1+ proteinuria at 3 mo16
65MActive, untreatedNephrotic syndrome, 6.9 g proteinuria/day and AKI (1.85 mg/dl)Negative serologies, SPEP, and cryoglobulinMPGN with IgG, C3, C1q.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with CHOPImproved: alive at 1 yr (Cr 1.1 mg/dl)17
54MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 6.9 mg/dl), 2.1 g proteinuria on 24 hLow C3. ANA, ANCA, anti-GBM, HIV, hepatitis, C4 normalProliferative GN with crescents, with IgG (2+) and C3 (2+).Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with CHOPImproved urine output and Cr (<3 mg/dl) at 8 wk18
77MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 3.56 mg/dl), anasarca with 14.9 g proteinuria on 24-hLow C3, C4, positive RF, SPEP: monoclonal IgG-λ and IgM-κ. Positive cryoglobulin. Negative hepatitis serologiesMPGN, with IgG (1+), IgM (1-2+), C3 (1-2+), C1q (1+), k (1-2+), l (tr) Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with rituximab, prednisoneImproved renal function at 2 wk (Cr 2.5 mg/dl, 8.9 g/g uPCr), but died of disease at 3 mo19
58MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 3.18 mg/dl), hematuriaANA, ANCA, C3, C4, HCV, HBV, HIV, SPEP negative/normalProliferative immune complex mediated GN, with C3 (4+), IgG (3+), IgM (2+)MCL treated with R-CHOPNormal renal function: Cr 1.2 mg/dl at 3 mo20
74MRelapsed MCL, initial diagnosis and treatment 15 years earlierNephrotic syndrome with 8.4 g/g uPCr, and AKI (Cr 2.4 mg/dl)SPEP and UPEP: IgM-lambda. ANA, dsDNA positiveProliferative GN with crescents, with glomerular IgG, IgM, C3, C1q, thought to represent de novo lupus nephritis.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with rituximab, bortezomibImproved: Cr 2 mg/dl and proteinuria 3.8 g/g at 3 mo21
58MActive, untreatedAKI, 3.8 g/g proteinuriaANA, ANCA, C3, C4, HIV, hepatitis serologies negativeMPGN with IgG (3+), IgM (2+), C3 (3+), and C1q (3+) with crescents.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with chemotherapy and rituximabNormal renal function at 6 mo22
56MActive, untreatedAKI, (Cr 6 mg/dl) subnephrotic proteinuria (1.1 g/g)Positive PR3 ANCA. C3, C4 normalProliferative immune complex mediated GN with IgG, IgM, C3, C1q, crescents.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treatedNormal renal function: Cr 1.02 mg/dl at 4 mo23
C3 glomerulonephritis
59MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 8.7 mg/dl), nephrotic syndrome with 6.9 g proteinuria on 24 hLow C3 and C4, and positive dsDNA. Negative ANA, ANCA,MPGN with crescents, C3 only.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with cyclophosphamide, prednisoneNormal kidney function with minimal proteinuria (0.25g) at 3 wk24
65MActive, on treatmentAKI (Cr 12.5 mg/dl) nephrotic proteinuria (4 g/g)Deletion of CFHR1 and CFHR3 genes. HIV, hepatitis serologies negativeCrescentic C3GN, without mesangial or endocapillary hypercellularityMethylprednisolone. MCL treated with R-CHOPImproved: Cr 2 mg/dl, proteinuria <300 mg/d at 12 mo25
Pauci-immune complex crescentic GN
77MActive, untreatedAKI (Cr 5.3)Positive PR3, ANCA, low C3 and C3, positive ANA. Negative SPEP, HIV, hepatitis serologiesPauci-immune complex focally crescentic GN.Lymphoma infiltrationMCL treated with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisoneRegained renal function, came off dialysis, but died at 8 mo26
Renal infiltration only
69MRelapsed MCL, initial diagnosis and treatment 3 yr earlierAKI (Cr 11.1 mg/dl)ANA, ANCA, anti-GBM, HIV, hepatitis serologies negative. C3, C4 normalDiffuse parenchymal lymphoma infiltration.No GNPatient declined further chemotherapyESKD, died 12 mo later27
Proliferative GN, not further described
52MActive, untreatedAKIHepatitis and ASO serologies negative. Cryoglobulin negativeProliferative GNMCL treated with Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, prednisoneNormal kidney function, and remission of lymphoma32
75MMCL diagnosed 23 mo laterAKI (Cr 6.5 mg/dl)ANA, ANCA, anti-GBM, cryoglobulin, SPEP, C3 and C4 negative/normalProliferative GN with crescentsGN treated with cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and azathioprine. MCL later treated with chlorambucilMinimal initial improvement in kidney function (Cr 4.5 mg/dl); died of disease 10 mo after MCL diagnosis31

AKI, acute kidney injury; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; ASO, antistreptolysin O; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; Cr, creatinine; CVAD, Central venous access device; dsDNA, double stranded DNA; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; F, female; GBM, glomerular basement membrane antibody; GN, glomerulonephritis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; RF, rheumatoid factor; SPEP, serum protein electrophoresis; uPCr, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio; UPEP, urine protein electrophoresis.

Previously reported cases of patients with MCL and kidney biopsies AKI, acute kidney injury; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; ASO, antistreptolysin O; CHOP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; Cr, creatinine; CVAD, Central venous access device; dsDNA, double stranded DNA; ESKD, end-stage kidney disease; F, female; GBM, glomerular basement membrane antibody; GN, glomerulonephritis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; M, male; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone; RF, rheumatoid factor; SPEP, serum protein electrophoresis; uPCr, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio; UPEP, urine protein electrophoresis. In some cases, the diversity of IC disease pattern and serologic findings raised the possibility of an unrelated autoimmune disease. Specifically, 4 patients with polyclonal IC disease had either positive autoimmune serologies (including both antinuclear antibody and antidouble stranded DNA in case #6 and #10; antinuclear antibody in case #9) or a modest lupus-like GN (with negative serologies, case #5). However, these patients had no preceding diagnosis of autoimmune disease nor systemic symptoms. There has been a previous report of similar serologic and biopsy findings in a patient with “lupus-like” GN associated with MCL, highlighting this diagnostic pitfall. When considering a GN which does not fit the apparent clinical scenario, occult infection or neoplasia including lymphoproliferative disease are important considerations. A great variety of paraneoplastic autoimmune and rheumatologic features are well-documented in patients with lymphoma including MCL as well as solid-organ malignancies.33, 34, 35, 36 Paraneoplastic kidney diseases associated with lymphoproliferative disorders but without direct Ig deposition are also well-recognized, and include C3GN,,37, 38, 39, 40 minimal change disease, thrombotic microangiopathy,, and pauci-immune vasculitis. Kidney involvement by paraneoplastic Ig deposition most commonly manifests as MN associated with solid-organ malignancies, and infrequently, other conditions.,, Taken together, the cases in our series and review of literature demonstrate that, in comparison to other B-cell lymphomas or plasma cell neoplasms, MCL-associated kidney injury commonly contains C3 or polyclonal immune deposits, suggesting these are driven by systemic immune or complement dysregulation rather than direct deposition of a circulating paraprotein. Mechanisms driving MCL-associated IC disease and underlying immune phenomenon warrant further investigation. C3GN in the setting of a paraprotein or with masked monoclonal immune deposits is recognized as an monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance-associated lesion.,37, 38, 39, 40, One of our C3GN patients had a circulating paraprotein, but the MCL had discrepant light chain restriction, thereby obscuring the relationship between the lymphoma, paraprotein, and GN. Paraffin IF was not performed in either C3GN cases in our cohort which may have informed more precise classification. Although MCL is generally considered nonsecretory, 2 previous cases of C3GN which responded to MCL-directed therapy have been reported,, supporting our observations. Thus, C3GN in our MCL cohort was not consistently associated with a paraprotein but nonetheless benefited from treatment of the MCL. A total of 3 cases had low serum complement levels (case #1 and #17) or a positive rheumatoid factor (case #7) raising the possibility of cryoglobulinemic GN. The biopsies lacked immune thrombi, immune deposit substructure, or even identifiable deposits in a patient with MCL undergoing treatment (case #17). No rash or other systemic symptoms were described, and serum cryoglobulin testing was either not available or negative. It is possible but unlikely that some of these represent cryoglobulinemic GN which we could neither prove nor entirely exclude based on available information. A total of 5 of 20 patients with active MCL had an identifiable paraprotein on SPEP and/or urine protein electrophoresis, all of whom had kidney dysfunction potentially attributable to lymphoma. However, none of these cases had monoclonal glomerular deposits which matched the circulating protein. Notably, case #2 had PGNMID with κ-restricted deposits but λ paraproteinemia and lambda-restricted lymphoma. We are unable to explain this discordance, but we and others have observed rare cases of PGNMID with glomerular deposits discordant from the light chain restriction of the paraproteinemia or lymphoproliferative disorder. Given the low rate of detection of paraproteinemia in PGNMID in general (20%–30%),, this apparent discrepancy may be related to undetected clonal or paraneoplastic oligoclonal processes, which may be better detected by new and more sensitive methods, which were not available for routine clinical practice. The relative infrequency of monoclonal deposits in MCL is distinct from IC disease found in plasma cell neoplasia and low grade B-cell lymphomas, which often but not always have injury related to direct kidney deposition or filtration of the monoclonal protein, such as in PGNMID, monoclonal Ig deposition disease, cryoglobulinemic GN, immunotactoid GN, AL amyloid, light chain cast nephropathy, light chain proximal tubulopathy, and others.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Weaknesses in this study are those inherent to retrospective case review spanning a long period of time, namely: complete clinical, laboratory, and outcome data were not available for all patients. Tissue for further antigen testing in MN cases was not obtainable and biopsies with TBM deposits were not tested for antilow density lipoprotein receptor related protein 2; the possibility that these represent anti-brush border antibody disease cannot be excluded. MCL treatment regimens varied somewhat over time and by institution, but a large portion of patients were treated with a combination of bendamustine and rituximab with good lymphoma and renal response; this is the common treatment in MCL, and is well-tolerated with high response rates. Although MCL treatment is consistently associated with clinical remission of GN in our series and in previous reports regardless of treatment type (Table 3), we did not collect specific laboratory evidence of hematologic response. Correlation with both renal response and hematologic parameters are important touchstones in determining whether IC or C3GN are related to an underlying lymphoproliferative disorder. Even so, therapy which can affect both processes independently makes their relationship difficult to determine in this and other reports of GNs associated with lymphoproliferative disorders. Importantly, our findings do not establish a mechanistic link between MCL and glomerular disease, and it is possible that GN clinically improved due to a variety of factors other than lymphoma remission, including rituximab therapy. Despite these weaknesses, our cohort benefits from the experience of multiple institutions and represents the first series of MCL-associated kidney injury. Reassuringly, our systematic review of previously published isolated case reports largely substantiates our findings. In conclusion, data from our cohort in addition to previous case reports demonstrate that diverse IC patterns of injury define a broad spectrum of MCL-associated kidney injury. The diversity of IC and C3 mediated disease patterns and complex clinical scenarios can present diagnostic dilemmas, and assembly of this cohort may inform future interpretation of biopsies in patients with MCL. Despite their heterogeneity, these lesions may respond well to MCL-directed therapy.

Disclosures

All the authors declared no competing interests.
  50 in total

1.  Toward a working definition of C3 glomerulopathy by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  Jean Hou; Glen S Markowitz; Andrew S Bomback; Gerald B Appel; Leal C Herlitz; M Barry Stokes; Vivette D D'Agati
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Mini review: A unique case of crescentic C3 glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Dharmenaan Palamuthusingam; Murty Mantha; Kimberley Oliver; Ketan Bavishi; Shyam Dheda
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  The First Case of Lupus Nephritis Developing in a Patient With Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Taro Horino; Yuki Osakabe; Mio Matsuura; Osamu Ichii; Yoshio Terada
Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.517

4.  Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with low-grade B cell lymphoma presenting in the kidney.

Authors:  M B Stokes; B Wood; Ch E Alpers
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.975

5.  NELL1 is a target antigen in malignancy-associated membranous nephropathy.

Authors:  Tiffany N Caza; Samar I Hassen; Zeljko Dvanajscak; Michael Kuperman; Rick Edmondson; Christian Herzog; Aaron Storey; John Arthur; L Nicholas Cossey; Shree G Sharma; Daniel J Kenan; Christopher P Larsen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with masked monotypic immunoglobulin deposits.

Authors:  Christopher P Larsen; Nidia C Messias; Patrick D Walker; Mary E Fidler; Lynn D Cornell; Loren H Hernandez; Mariam P Alexander; Sanjeev Sethi; Samih H Nasr
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 7.  The Clone Wars: Diagnosing and Treating Dysproteinemic Kidney Disease in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Rupali S Avasare; Nicole K Andeen; Andrea Havasi; Jonathan J Hogan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Renal involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Rimda Wanchoo; Carolina Bernabe Ramirez; Jacqueline Barrientos; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2018-04-11

9.  Mass spectrometry for the evaluation of monoclonal proteins in multiple myeloma and related disorders: an International Myeloma Working Group Mass Spectrometry Committee Report.

Authors:  David L Murray; Noemi Puig; Sigurdur Kristinsson; Saad Z Usmani; Angela Dispenzieri; Giada Bianchi; Shaji Kumar; Wee Joo Chng; Roman Hajek; Bruno Paiva; Anders Waage; S Vincent Rajkumar; Brian Durie
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.