| Literature DB >> 35256670 |
Md Abdul Kuddus1,2,3, Emma S McBryde4,5, Adeshina I Adekunle4,6, Lisa J White7, Michael T Meehan4.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is an airborne infectious disease that causes millions of deaths worldwide each year (1.2 million people died in 2019). Alarmingly, several strains of the causative agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)-including drug-susceptible (DS) and drug-resistant (DR) variants-already circulate throughout most developing and developed countries, particularly in Bangladesh, with totally drug-resistant strains starting to emerge. In this study we develop a two-strain DS and DR TB transmission model and perform an analysis of the system properties and solutions. Both analytical and numerical results show that the prevalence of drug-resistant infection increases with an increasing drug use through amplification. Both analytic results and numerical simulations suggest that if the basic reproduction numbers of both DS ([Formula: see text]) and DR ([Formula: see text]) TB are less than one, i.e. [Formula: see text] the disease-free equilibrium is asymptotically stable, meaning that the disease naturally dies out. Furthermore, if [Formula: see text], then DS TB dies out but DR TB persists in the population, and if [Formula: see text] both DS TB and DR TB persist in the population. Further, sensitivity analysis of the model parameters found that the transmission rate of both strains had the greatest influence on DS and DR TB prevalence. We also investigated the effect of treatment rates and amplification on both DS and DR TB prevalence; results indicate that inadequate or inappropriate treatment makes co-existence more likely and increases the relative abundance of DR TB infections.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35256670 PMCID: PMC8901732 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07536-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow chart of the TB compartmental mathematical model showing six states and the transitions in and out of each state in a closed population (no migration). Here, Total population, Susceptible population, Latent population, Infected population, Recovered population, Birth rate / Death rate, Contact rate/Transmission rate, Progression rate, Disease-related death rate, Treatment rate, Recovery rate, Proportion of amplification and Rate of losing immunity. Subscripts and denote DS and DR quantities, respectively.
Depiction and estimation of parameters.
| Parameters | Description | Estimated value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population in 2015 | 159,000,000 | [ | |
| Birth/death rate | [ | ||
| Transmission rate for DS TB | Fitted | ||
| Transmission rate for DR TB | Fitted | ||
| Progression rate from | 0.129 per year | [ | |
| Progression rate from | 0.129 per year | [ | |
| Recovery rate for DS TB | 0.287 per year | [ | |
| Recovery rate for DR TB | 0.12 per year | [ | |
| Proportion of treated patients who amplify | 0.07 per year | [ | |
| Disease related death rate for DS TB | 0.37 over 3 years | [ | |
| Disease related death rate for DR TB | 0.37 over 3 years | [ | |
| Treatment rate for DS TB | 0.94 per year | [ | |
| Treatment rate for DR TB | 0.78 per year | [ | |
| Rate of losing immunity | 0.10 per year | [ |
Figure 2WHO reported DS and DR TB annual incidence data (blue dot) and the corresponding best fit (green solid curve) of our proposed model: (left) DS TB and (right) DR TB.
Figure 3Stability of the co-existent endemic equilibrium as a function of (as determined by the eigenvalues of the system Jacobian matrix). Random parameter draws leading to eigenvalues with exclusively negative real parts (i.e. stable) are colored yellow, whilst those leading to eigenvalues with at least one positive real part (i.e. unstable) are colored blue. All stable points (yellow) lie above the line , and all unstable points (blue) lie below.
Figure 4Graph shows the existence and local stability regions for the disease-free (magenta shaded region), mono-existent (green shaded region) and co-existent (yellow shaded region) equilibrium points.
Figure 5The impact of amplification on DS and DR TB prevalence. All remaining parameters consider their baseline values as reported in Table 1.
Figure 6Effect of DS TB treatment rate () on total TB prevalence when and are fixed. All remaining parameters consider their baseline values as reported in Table 1.
Figure 7Effect of DS TB treatment rate () on DR TB prevalence when and are fixed. All remaining parameters consider their baseline values as reported in Table 1.
Figure 8PRCC values representing the association between model output and the model parameters (transmission rate), (progression rate), (recovery rate), (disease related death rate), (treatment rate) and (amplification rate), when . Subscripts and denote DS and DR quantities, respectively.
Figure 9PRCC values showing the association between model output and the model parameters , , , when .
Sensitivity indices for and .
| Parameter | Sensitivity index ( | Parameter | Sensitivity index ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| + 1.000 | + 1.000 | ||
| + 0.100 | + 0.100 | ||
| − 0.178 | − 0.093 | ||
| − 0.229 | − 0.288 | ||
| − 0.583 | − 0.607 |