| Literature DB >> 35254290 |
Anna Romanchuk1, Alexander Trigub1, Tatiana Plakhova1, Anastasiia Kuzenkova1, Roman Svetogorov2, Kristina Kvashnina1, Stepan Kalmykov1.
Abstract
Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) is a comprehensive and usable method for characterizing the structures of various materials, including radioactive and nuclear materials. Unceasing discussions about the interpretation of EXAFS results for actinide nanoparticles (NPs) or colloids were still present during the last decade. In this study, new experimental data for PuO2 and CeO2 NPs with different average sizes were compared with published data on AnO2 NPs that highlight the best fit and interpretation of the structural data. In terms of the structure, PuO2, CeO2, ThO2, and UO2 NPs exhibit similar behaviors. Only ThO2 NPs have a more disordered and even partly amorphous structure, which results in EXAFS characteristics. The proposed new core-shell model for NPs with calculated effective coordination number perfectly fits the results of the variations in a metal-metal shell with a decrease in NP size. open access.Entities:
Keywords: actinide; cerium; coordination number; extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS); nanoparticles; plutonium
Year: 2022 PMID: 35254290 PMCID: PMC8900841 DOI: 10.1107/S160057752101300X
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Synchrotron Radiat ISSN: 0909-0495 Impact factor: 2.616
List of the studied CeO2 and PuO2 samples
| Sample | Synthesis procedure | Average particle size (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| CeO2-NPs-2.2 nm | From 0.05 | 2.2 ± 0.2 |
| CeO2-NPs-2.5 nm | From 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.3 |
| CeO2-NPs-2.9 nm | From 0.01 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| CeO2-NPs-5.7 nm | From 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.6 |
| CeO2-NPs-6.3 nm | From 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.8 |
| CeO2-NPs-15 nm | From 0.8 | 15 ± 2 |
| CeO2-bulk | From 0.1 | >100 |
| PuO2-NPs-2.0 nm | From 10−4
| 2.0 ± 0.2 |
| PuO2-NPs-2.2 nm | From 6 × 10−5
| 2.2 ± 0.3 |
| PuO2-NPs-3.2 nm | From 10−4
| 3.2 ± 0.3 |
| PuO2-bulk | PuO2 reference (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Batch ID No. Pu-242-327 A1) | >100 |
Data from Gerber et al. (2020 ▸).
Figure 1(a, b) Ce K-EXAFS: (a) FT magnitude of EXAFS data (k = 3–13), (b) k 2-weighted χ(k) experimental functions; (c, d) Pu L 3-EXAFS: (c) FT magnitude of EXAFS data (k = 3–13), (d) k 2-weighted χ(k) experimental functions.
Structural parameters obtained from the fitting of EXAFS spectra
| Sample | Coordination shell | Coordination number, CN | Interatomic distance, | Debye−Waller factor (σ2) (Å2) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CeO2-bulk | O | 8 | 2.34 ± 0.02 | 0.0097 | 0.044 |
| Ce | 12 | 3.84 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–13 | |
| O | 24 | 4.39 ± 0.08 | 0.014 | 1.5–4.2 | |
| CeO2-NPs-15 nm | O | 8 | 2.33 ± 0.02 | 0.009 | 0.032 |
| Ce | 10.3 ± 0.8 | 3.84 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–13 | |
| O | 10.5 ± 15.1 | 4.43 ± 0.07 | 0.014 | 1.5–4.2 | |
| CeO2-NPs-6.3 nm | O | 8 | 2.33 ± 0.01 | 0.0009 | 0.022 |
| Ce | 8.4 ± 0.6 | 3.83 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–13 | |
| 1.5–4.2 | |||||
| CeO2-NPs-5.7 nm | O | 8 | 2.33 ± 0.02 | 0.0116 | 0.052 |
| Ce | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 3.84 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–13 | |
| 1.5–4.2 | |||||
| CeO2-NPs-2.9 nm | O | 8 | 2.34 ± 0.02 | 0.0125 | 0.053 |
| Ce | 5.1 ± 0.5 | 3.84 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–13 | |
| 1.5–4.2 | |||||
| CeO2-NPs-2.5 nm | O | 8 | 2.34 ± 0.02 | 0.0161 | 0.068 |
| Ce | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.84 ± 0.01 | 0.005 | 4–11 | |
| 1.5–4.0 | |||||
| CeO2-NPs-2.2 nm | O | 8 | 2.35 ± 0.02 | 0.0171 | 0.175 |
| Ce | 2.6 ± 0.6 | 3.87 ± 0.02 | 0.005 | 4–11 | |
| 1.5–4.0 | |||||
| PuO2-bulk | O | 8 | 2.33 ± 0.01 | 0.0061 | 0.016 |
| Pu | 12 | 3.82 ± 0.01 | 0.004 | 3–14 | |
| O | 24 | 4.39 ± 0.02 | 0.010 | 1.3–4.2 | |
| PuO2-NPs-3.2 nm | O | 8 | 2.32 ± 0.02 | 0.012 | 0.080 |
| Pu | 4.7 ± 0.7 | 3.83 ± 0.01 | 0.004 | 3–12 | |
| 1.3–4.0 | |||||
| PuO2-NPs-2.2 nm | O | 8 | 2.31 ± 0.01 | 0.011 | 0.028 |
| Pu | 3.3 ± 0.4 | 3.81 ± 0.01 | 0.004 | 3–12 | |
| 1.3–4.0 | |||||
| PuO2-NPs-2.0 nm | O | 8 | 2.31 ± 0.02 | 0.012 | 0.16 |
| Pu | 1.7 ± 1.1 | 3.80 ± 0.03 | 0.004 | 3–12 | |
| 1.3–4.0 |
Parameters were fixed.
Figure 2Dependence of the DWF of the first coordination shell (Me–O) with the average NP size from the results of this work and previously published data. ▸
Figure 3Comparison of the size-dependent change of Me–Me CN in CeO2 and PuO2 NPs, as determined by EXAFS versus calculated values.
Cell parameter and solubility product constant (K sp) for studied series CeO2–PuO2–ThO2–UO2
| Cell parameter, | Reference | log | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PuO2 | 5.396 | 00-041-1170 | −58.3 ± 0.5 |
| CeO2 | 5.4124 | 00-081-0792 | −59.3 ± 0.3 |
| UO2 | 5.466 | 00-078-0725 | |
| ThO2 | 5.597 | 00-042-1462 | −47.0 ± 0.8 |
Guillaumont et al. (2003 ▸).
Plakhova et al. (2016 ▸).
Rand et al. (2008 ▸).
Figure 4Changes in Me–Me CN with NP size in the series UO2–ThO2–CeO2–PuO2. Data for ThO2 (Plakhova et al., 2019 ▸) and UO2 NPs (Gerber et al., 2021 ▸) were taken from our previously published papers.