| Literature DB >> 35252558 |
Mustefa Adem Hussen1, Bekelu Teka Worku2.
Abstract
Background: Quality of service and client satisfaction are crucial to increase services utilization. However, there is a paucity of data in this study area. Consequently, this study aimed to assess "Quality of Antenatal Care (ANC) and client satisfaction in Public Health Facilities". Method: Facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 11 to April 19, 2019. Systematic random sampling was used to select 366 women. Data were collected through the exit interview, data extraction, and observation. Result: Quality of ANC was 30% (95% CI = 25-35). About 55% (95% CI = 50-60) of women were satisfied with the services. Iron/folic acid supplementation (AOR = 2.23, 95% CI;1.30-4.79), measuring weight (AOR = 3.61, 95% CI = 1.40-9.31), travel time >60 min (AOR = 4, 95% CI;2.3-8.16) and 60-120 min (AOR = 3.68, 95% CI = 1.61-8.38), and consultation time (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.14-7.31) were positively associated with client satisfaction, while health professional initiation to ask question never (AOR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.08-0.43) and to ask sometimes (AOR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.16-0.65) were negatively associated.Entities:
Keywords: Donabedian quality-of-care framework; antenatal care; client satisfaction; quality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252558 PMCID: PMC8894960 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221083163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Patient Exp ISSN: 2374-3735
Distribution of Sociodemographic and Obstetric Characteristics of Respondents.
| Variable | Category | N = 360 | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <20 | 68 | 18.9 |
| 20–24 | 84 | 23.3 | |
| 25–29 | 139 | 38.6 | |
| 30–34 | 45 | 12.5 | |
| > = 35 | 24 | 6.6 | |
| Educational status | Unable to read and write | 101 | 28.1 |
| Read and write | 65 | 18.1 | |
| Primary education (1–8) | 117 | 32.5 | |
| Secondary and above education (9–12 + ) | 77 | 21.4 | |
| Occupation | Housewife | 135 | 37.5 |
| Student | 17 | 4.7 | |
| Farmer | 130 | 36.1 | |
| Merchant | 49 | 13.6 | |
| Government employee | 29 | 8.1 | |
| Travel time | <60 min | 217 | 60.3 |
| 60–120 min | 91 | 25.3 | |
| >120 min | 52 | 14.4 | |
| Income | < 1,250 ETB | 305 | 84.7 |
| > = 1,250 ETB | 55 | 15.3 | |
| Parity | Primigravida | 108 | 30.0 |
| Multigravida | 252 | 70.0 | |
| Multipara | 243 | 67.5 | |
| Nulliparous | 117 | 32.5 | |
| Abortion | Yes | 53 | 14.7 |
| No | 307 | 85.3 | |
| Current history of ANC | First | 161 | 44.7 |
| Second | 102 | 28.3 | |
| Third and above | 97 | 27.0 | |
| Previous history of ANC | Yes | 195 | 54.2 |
| No | 165 | 45.8 |
Abbreviation: ANC, antenatal care.
Distributions of Available Structure Quality Attributes in Antenatal Care (ANC) Services.
| Structure | Variable | Available number (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Human resource | General practitioner | 1 (25) |
| Health officer | 2 (50) | |
| Pharmacist | 3 (75) | |
| Laboratory technician | 2 (50) | |
| Environmental health professional | 2 (50) | |
| Essential drugs | Magnesium sulphate | 3 (75) |
| Penicillin | 4 (100) | |
| Sulfadoxine pyrimethamine | 2 (50) | |
| Mebendazole/Albendazole | 3 (75) | |
| PMTCT drug | 3 (75) | |
| Aldomate | 3 (75) | |
| Infrastructures | ANC waiting area | 1 (25) |
| Private counseling/examination room | 4 (100) | |
| Water in examination room | 2 (50) | |
| Clean toilet | 4 (100) | |
| Electricity | 3 (75) | |
| Ambulance | 4 (100) | |
| Basic equipment | Functional thermometer | 3 (75) |
| Functional standing light/torch | 2 (50) | |
| Functional measuring tape | 2 (50) | |
| Basic laboratory tests | Each
| 2 (50) |
Syphilis test (VDRL), urine analysis for protein/glucose, blood group/Rh factor test, hemoglobin/hematocrit(Hgb/Hct), and stool examination.
Distributions of Process Quality Attribute of Interpersonal Aspect.
| Variable | Category | Frequency (Percent) |
|---|---|---|
| N = 360 | ||
| Respecting | Yes | 356 (98.9) |
| No | 4 (1.1) | |
| Privacy | Yes | 289 (80.3) |
| No | 71 (19.7) | |
| Confidentiality | Yes | 346 (96.1) |
| No | 14 (3.9) | |
| Initiation to ask question | Always | 53 (14.7) |
| Never | 69 (19.2) | |
| Sometimes | 161 (44.7) | |
| Usually | 77 (21.4) | |
| Time spent in health facility | <60 min | 329 (91.4) |
| > = 60 min | 31 (8.6) | |
| Consultation time | <30 min | 298 (82.8) |
| > = 30 min | 62 (17.2) | |
| Service observation checklist, N = 80 | ||
| Health care providers introduced themselves to clients | Yes | 8 (10) |
| No | 72 (90) | |
| Providers call clients by their name | Yes | 24 (30) |
| No | 56 (70) | |
| Providers examined face, hand, and leg for edema | Yes | 56 (70) |
| No | 24 (30) | |
| Providers checked eye conjunctiva for sign of anemia | Yes | 72 (90) |
| No | 8 (10) | |
| Providers palpated abdomen for uterine height | Yes | 72 (90) |
| No | 8 (10) | |
| Providers auscultated fetal heartbeat | Yes | 76 (95) |
| No | 4 (5) | |
Figure 1.Components of antenatal care (ANC) services done at the four public health facilities.
Satisfaction Levels of Pregnant Women on ANC Services Received.
| Characteristics | Satisfaction | Frequency (Percent) |
|---|---|---|
| Providers greeting was good and politely | Satisfied | 124 (34.4) |
| Not satisfied | 236 (65.5) | |
| Waiting time was fair | Satisfied | 104 (28.9) |
| Not satisfied | 256 (71.1) | |
| Waiting place was adequate and with seats | Satisfied | 97 (26.9) |
| Not satisfied | 263 (73.1) | |
| Cost incurred for the service was fair | Satisfied | 284 (78.9) |
| Not satisfied | 76 (21.1) | |
| Provider was easy to understand | Satisfied | 295 (81.9) |
| Not satisfied | 65 (18.1) | |
| Privacy during consultation was maintained | Satisfied | 291 (80.8) |
| Not satisfied | 69 (19.2) | |
| Providers perform the procedure with cleanliness | Satisfied | 292 (81.1) |
| Not satisfied | 68 (18.9) | |
| ANC clinic has clean latrine and adequate water | Satisfied | 156 (43.3) |
| Not satisfied | 204 (56.7) | |
| You get quality service that you want | Satisfied | 301 (83.6) |
| Not satisfied | 59 (16.4) | |
| Today you received full information about ANC | Satisfied | 313 (86.9) |
| Not satisfied | 47 (13.1) | |
| Continue the rest of ANC visits in this health facility | Satisfied | 323 (89.7) |
| Not satisfied | 37 (10.3) | |
| Recommend ANC service to others | Satisfied | 329 (91.4) |
| Not satisfied | 31 (8.6) |
Abbreviation: ANC, antenatal care.
Multivariable Logistic Regression of Factors Association with Client Satisfaction Level.
| Factors | Resp. | Client satisfaction |
| bAOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Provider-initiated client to ask question* | Always | 16 (30.2) | 37 (69.8) | 0.20 (0.08−0.35) | 0.54 (0.20−1.50) |
| Never | 33 (48.8) | 36 (52.2) | 0.34 (0.17−0.69) | 0.20 (0.08−0.43) | |
| Some times | 93 (57.8) | 68 (42.2) | 0.51 (0.28−0.93) | 0.32 (0.16−0.65) | |
| Usually | 56 (72.7) | 21 (27.3) | 1 | 1 | |
| cPMTCT | Yes | 80 (44.4) | 100 (55.6) | 0.42 (0.28−0.64) | 0.54 (0.31−1.00) |
| No | 118 (65.6) | 62 (34.4) | 1 | 1 | |
| Treated bed net | Yes | 26 (34.7) | 49 (65.3) | 0.35 (0.21−0.60) | 0.53 (0.26−1.10) |
| No | 172 (60.4) | 113 (39.6) | 1 | 1 | |
| Iron/folic acid given* | Yes | 161 (56.9) | 122 (43.1) | 1.43 (0.86−2.36) | 2.23 (1.31−4.79) |
| No | 37 (48.1) | 40 (51.9) | 1 | 1 | |
| Mebendazole given | Yes | 6 (23.7) | 16 (72.7) | 0.30 (0.11−0.78) | 0.32 (0.11−1.00) |
| No | 192 (56.8) | 146 (43.2) | 1 | 1 | |
| Weight measured* | Yes | 190 (57.1) | 143 (42.9) | 3.16 (1.34−7.41) | 3.61 (1.40−9.31) |
| No | 8 (29.6) | 19 (70.4) | 1 | 1 | |
| Travel time* | <60 min | 130 (59.9) | 87 (40.1) | 2.60 (1.40−4.9.) | 4 (2.3−8.16) |
| 60–120 | 49 (53.8) | 42 (46.2) | 2.03 (1.01−4.08) | 3.68 (1.61−8.38) | |
| >120 min | 19 (36.5) | 33 (63.5) | 1 | 1 | |
| Consultation* | <30 min | 183 (61.4) | 115 (38.6) | 4.99 (2.67−9.33) | 2.89 (1.14−7.31) |
| > = 30m | 15 (24.2) | 47 (75.8) | 1 | 1 | |
Crude odds ratio, b Adjusted odds ratio, c Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV.
*Significantly associating at p-value <.5.