| Literature DB >> 35252303 |
Jin Wang1, Ang Li1, Jiaqiang Hu1, Bowei Zhang1, Jingmin Liu1, Yan Zhang1, Shuo Wang1.
Abstract
The effects of frying process on the nutritional property, physicochemical quality, and in vitro digestibility of instant noodle products are investigated in this study. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) were also used to explore the changes in the microstructure and protein transformation. Noodles, after the frying process, showed a lower proportion of carbohydrate, protein, fiber, and also total starch and digestible starch, but higher content of fat and resistant starch in the proximate analysis. The frying process was also considered to improve the texture, surface color, and sensory properties of instant noodle products, accompanied by better cooking quality, including shorter cooking time and lower cooking loss during the rehydration. The honeycomb-like, porous, and less uniformed structure, and also the higher levels of β-sheets and β-turns, and the lower proportion of α-helixes of protein structure from fried instant noodle was also observed. The in vitro digestibility of starch and protein were downregulated in the fried group (81.96% and 81.31, respectively, on average) compared with the non-fried group (97.58% and 88.78, respectively, on average). Thus, the frying process lowered the glycemic index and regulated protein secondary structure by inhibiting continuous digesting enzyme activity, generating starch-lipid complexes, and changing the levels of protein transformation. In conclusion, our findings will provide an innovative evaluation of the frying process on instant noodles and even other various starch-based prepared food products.Entities:
Keywords: frying process; in vitro digestibility; instant noodle; nutritional property; physicochemical quality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252303 PMCID: PMC8891372 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.823432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Constituents of the synthetic juices of the protein digestion model.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic and inorganic components | 1 g bovine serum albumin | 1 g bovine serum albumin | 1.8 g bovine serum albumin |
| 9 mL CaCl2·2H2O | 10 mL CaCl2·2H2 O | ||
| 30 g bile | |||
| Enzymes | 2.5 g pepsin | 9 g pancreatin | |
| 3 g mucin | 1.5 g lipase | ||
| pH | 1.30 ± 0.02 | 8.1 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.2 |
After mixing all the ingredients (inorganic components, organic components, and enzymes), the volume was increased to 500 ml with distilled water.
The concentration of CaCl.
Quality evaluation of fried and non-fried instant noodle (dry basis).
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| Carbohydrate (%) | 72.95 ± 0.11c | 74.74 ± 0.10c | 71.85 ± 0.84c | 84.50 ± 0.19a | 84.10 ± 0.36b | 84.36 ± 0.12a |
| Fat (%) | 17.49 ± 0.33a | 12.86 ± 0.01b | 17.05 ± 0.84a | 1.95 ± 0.17c | 2.51 ± 0.33c | 2.72 ± 0.17c |
| Protein (%) | 8.21 ± 0.18e | 9.85 ± 0.03b | 9.22 ± 0.04c | 10.07 ± 0.02b | 11.38 ± 0.04a | 8.95 ± 0.01d |
| Ash (%) | 1.22 ± 0.02d | 2.14 ± 0.04c | 1.33 ± 0.06d | 2.37 ± 0.03b | 0.74 ± 0.01e | 3.12 ± 0.02a |
| Fiber (%) | 0.12 ± 0.01c | 0.41 ± 0.06b | 0.55 ± 0.03b | 1.05 ± 0.03a | 1.14 ± 0.08a | 0.87 ± 0.04a |
|
| ||||||
| Hardness (N) | 1025.53 ± 70.66d | 1794.15 ± 22.15b | 1200.57 ± 75.46c | 2290.06 ± 23.33a | 1801.65 ± 51.775b | 2425.04 ± 7.51a |
| Springiness (N) | 0.92 ± 0.02c | 1.19 ± 0.19b | 0.85 ± 0.01d | 0.94 ± 0.02b | 0.70 ± 0.05e | 3.51 ± 0.19ac |
| Cohesiveness (N) | 0.43 ± 0.02c | 0.54 ± 0.02b | 0.47 ± 0.01c | 0.67 ± 0.01a | 0.42 ± 0.01c | 0.42 ± 0.01c |
| Chewiness (N) | 3817.96 ± 18.53a | 1269.37 ± 53.37b | 1172.55 ± 10.59b | 263.47 ± 33.67e | 451.18 ± 8.90d | 975.08 ± 69.53c |
| Gumminess (N) | 978.08 ± 31.37a | 937.25 ± 22.10a | 530.24 ± 7.40b | 1054.46 ± 4.95a | 521.31 ± 68.66b | 1087.37 ± 60.58a |
| Resilience (N) | 0.28 ± 0.01a | 0.20 ± 0.01b | 0.18 ± 0.01b | 0.13 ± 0.01c | 0.17 ± 0.01b | 0.17 ± 0.01b |
|
| ||||||
| Cooking time (s) | 203 ± 2.0d | 238 ± 2.5c | 159 ± 1.0e | 382 ± 1.5a | 266 ± 0.5b | 261 ± 1.0b |
| Cooking loss (%) | 9.60 ± 0.37b | 11.08 ± 0.30b | 9.90 ± 0.05b | 14.93 ± 0.62a | 14.48 ± 0.55a | 12.40 ± 0.21b |
| Water Absorption (%) | 126.34 ± 3.42e | 139.16 ± 0.13d | 130.20 ± 0.49e | 205.02 ± 1.75a | 195.78 ± 2.10b | 175.65 ± 0.11c |
|
| ||||||
| L* | 87.08 ± 0.01a | 84.92 ± 0.01c | 84.45 ± 0.02d | 85.85 ± 0.01b | 84.15 ± 0.01f | 84.30 ± 0.01e |
| a* | −0.36 ± 0.01e | −0.25 ± 0.02d | −0.17 ± 0.01c | 0.73 ± 0.02a | 0.64 ± 0.02b | 0.70 ± 0.01a |
| b* | 25.08 ± 0.03c | 25.16 ± 0.02b | 25.32 ± 0.01a | 13.15 ± 0.01f | 19.38 ± 0.01d | 16.68 ± 0.01e |
| ΔE | 14.15 ± 0.01a | 13.39 ± 0.02b | 13.40 ± 0.02b | 5.41 ± 0.02e | 7.76 ± 0.01c | 5.63 ± 0.01d |
Results are reported in means ± standard deviations (n = 3). Results were analyzed using the Newman–Keuls test. Means with different letters in the same row are significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Preliminary evaluation of fried and non-fried instant noodle products. (A) appearance; (B) sensory evaluation.
Thermal properties of fried and non-fried instant noodle.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| To1 | 60.16 ± 0.57a | 59.22 ± 1.07a | 59.30 ± 0.29a | 58.10 ± 0.29a | 57.62 ± 0.39a | 58.69 ± 0.31a |
| Tp1 | 96.42 ± 1.44a | 95.31 ± 0.33a | 94.99 ± 0.58a | 89.48 ± 1.44b | 90.55 ± 0.21b | 90.19 ± 0.42b |
| To2 | 131.76 ± 0.29a | 131.44 ± 0.60a | 129.12 ± 0.58a | 122.18 ± 0.58c | 122.18 ± 1.15c | 126.54 ± 0.28b |
| Δ H1 | 32.24 ± 0.39a | 33.36 ± 1.21a | 32.53 ± 2.01a | 29.60 ± 1.05a | 31.99 ± 0.49a | 30.12 ± 0.47a |
| Δ H2 | 23.08 ± 1.93a | 21.36 ± 0.93a | 22.09 ± 0.55a | 18.95 ± 1.29a | 20.96 ± 1.51a | 19.28 ± 0.63a |
| Δ Htotal | 55.32 ± 2.32a | 54.72 ± 2.14a | 54.62 ± 2.56a | 48.55 ± 2.34a | 52.95 ± 2.00a | 49.40 ± 1.10a |
T.
Figure 2In vitro starch digestion of fried and non-fried instant noodle products. (A) Digestograms and the fit of first-order kinetics; (B) starch fractions (C) kinetic constants of instant noodle products.
In vitro starch digestion and estimated glycemic index of fried and non-fried instant noodle.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||
| TS (g/100g) | 62.41 ± 0.26d | 69.93 ± 0.70c | 63.26 ± 0.11d | 74.70 ± 0.14a | 70.06 ± 0.10c | 72.97 ± 0.04b |
| RS (g/100g) | 11.22 ± 1.42b | 21.18 ± 1.98a | 21.71 ± 1.38a | 0.82 ± 0.66c | 0.94 ± 0.83c | 5.50 ± 0.04c |
| DS (g/100 g) | 51.19 ± 1.69b | 48.74 ± 1.69b | 41.56 ± 1.49c | 73.89 ± 0.52a | 69.11 ± 0.94a | 67.47 ± 0.08a |
|
| ||||||
| K × 10−2(min−1) | 1.725 ± 0.183e | 1.191 ± 0.086d | 1.191 ± 0.075d | 3.479 ± 0.901a | 3.296 ± 0.844b | 2.096 ± 0.353c |
|
| 0.952 | 0.978 | 0.983 | 0.915 | 0.926 | 0.938 |
| AUC Sample | 6393 ± 22.84b | 5766 ± 40.60c | 5752 ± 29.61c | 6804 ± 25.48a | 6481 ± 19.26b | 6794 ± 19.52a |
| HI | 103.01 ± 0.73b | 92.91 ± 1.28c | 92.68 ± 0.93c | 109.64 ± 0.81a | 104.43 ± 0.60b | 109.47 ± 0.61a |
| eGI | 96.26 ± 0.40b | 90.72 ± 0.70c | 90.59 ± 0.51c | 99.90 ± 0.44a | 97.04 ± 0.33b | 99.81 ± 0.34a |
TS, Total Starch; RS, Resistant Starch; DS, Digestible Starch; Values were expressed as the average of triplicates ± standard deviations. Results were analyzed using the Newman–Keuls test. Different letters within the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 3In vitro protein digestibility of fried and non-fried instant noodle products. (A) Protein hydrolysis rate of F1, F2, F3, NF1, NF2, and NF3, respectively; (B) FT-IR spectra during the phases of the untreated, oral, stomach, and intestine; (C) protein secondary structure changes during in vitro protein digestion.
Figure 4(A) Microstructure changes of fried and non-fried instant noodle products during simulated in vitro digestion (500×); (B) SEM image of instant noodle products at the final phase of digestion (3000×).