| Literature DB >> 35252158 |
Guiwen Shi1, Chaohua Yang1,2, Qing Wang1, Song Wang1, Gaoju Wang1, Rongguang Ao3, Dejian Li3.
Abstract
Bone is a dynamic organ that has the ability to repair minor injuries via regeneration. However, large bone defects with limited regeneration are debilitating conditions in patients and cause a substantial clinical burden. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) is an alternative method that mainly involves three factors: scaffolds, biologically active factors, and cells with osteogenic potential. However, active factors such as bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) are costly and show an unstable release. Previous studies have shown that compounds of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) can effectively promote regeneration of bone defects when administered locally and systemically. However, due to the low bioavailability of these compounds, many recent studies have combined TCM compounds with materials to enhance drug bioavailability and bone regeneration. Hence, the article comprehensively reviewed the local application of TCM compounds to the materials in the bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo. The compounds included icariin, naringin, quercetin, curcumin, berberine, resveratrol, ginsenosides, and salvianolic acids. These findings will contribute to the potential use of TCM compound-loaded materials in BTE.Entities:
Keywords: bone defect; bone regeneration; bone tissue engineering; drug delivery; osteogenesis; traditional Chinese medicine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252158 PMCID: PMC8894853 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.851561
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Overview of representative studies providing release profiles kinetics obtained from the use of TCM compound delivery systems.
| Compound | Carrier | Drug content | Initial burst release (time) | Total accumulative release (time) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icariin | CPC tablet | 1 mg | 2% (1 day) | 6% (15 days) |
|
| injectable CPC | 2 mg | 35% (7 days) | 85% (30 days) |
| |
| PLGA/TCP scaffold | 0.16, 0.32, and 0.64% | N | 90% (14 weeks) |
| |
| SF/PLCL nanofbrous membrane | 10−5 mol/L | 47.54 ± 0.06% (5 days) | 82.09 ± 1.86% (30 days) |
| |
| HA/alginate scaffold | 10−5 mol/L | N | 69.07 ± 8.16% (40 days) |
| |
| PLGA microspheres | 4 × 10−3 M | N | 57.5 ± 5.0 μg/ml (28 days) |
| |
| HA/CS coated Ti | 1.5 × 10−5 mol/L, 3 × 10−5 mol/L, 6 × 10−5 mol/L | N | 100% (14 days) |
| |
| Naringin | PCL/PEG-b-PCL nanoscaffold | 3.33 mg/ml | 20% (1 day) | 93% (90 days) |
|
| CS microspheres/PLLA scaffold | 59.39 ± 3.43% | N | 90% (30 days) |
| |
| PLGA/PLLA/PDLLA blend fibers | 0.7wt% | Y | 82% (21 days) |
| |
| 7.0wt% | Y | 11% (21 days) | |||
| SF/HA scaffold | 0.1% | 70% (20 h) | 90% (80 days) |
| |
| Quercetin | CDHA scaffold | 200 μM | N | 50% (60 days) |
|
| PD-PLLA scaffold | 8.33 μg | 3 μg, 12 h | 6.26 μg (24 days) |
| |
| 10.84 μg | 3 μg, 12 h | 9.03 μg (24 days) | |||
| 13.07 μg | 3 μg, 12 h | 11.15 μg (24 days) | |||
| PLGA microspheres | 7.67 ± 0.10% | N | 50% (30 days) |
| |
| nHA microspheres | 200 μM | 6.39 ± 0.20% (1 h) | 74.68 ± 1.33% (28 days) |
| |
| Curcumin | PCL nanofibers | 1wt% | N | 70% (12 days) |
|
| Liposomes/TCP scaffold | 68% | N | 17% (60 days) |
| |
| CS nanoparticles-SF/HAMA hydrogel | 10% | N | 77.1% (32 days) |
| |
| HA coated Ti6Al4V | 25 μg | 17% (24 h) | 93% (22 days) |
| |
| Berberine | PCL/COL scafolds | 50 μg/ml | 8.63 ± 0.50% (1 day) | 61.4% (27 days) |
|
| PCL/PVP-MC/CS | 10 μM | 30% (1 day) | 65% (28 days) |
| |
| Bilayer Membrane | |||||
| Resveratrol | PCL nanofibers | 0.1:9.9 (w/w) | Y | 28.6 ± 1.4 µM (35 days) |
|
| PLA nanofibers | 0.1:9.9 (w/w) | Y | 12.3 ± 1.8 µM (35 days) |
| |
| PCL scaffold | 5.5% (w/w) | N | 64% (12 days) |
| |
| PEGDA/TCS Hydrogel | 1,066 μM/g | N | 71.5% (32 days) |
| |
| SLNs/GelMA scaffold | 0.08 wt% | 14% (12 h) | 75% (28 days) |
| |
| Salvianolic acids | CS/HA scaffold | 10−7 mol | N | 35% (56 days) |
|
| Ginsenosides | Gelatin microspheres/Sr-α-CaS | 2.51% | N | 85% (120 h) |
|
| Scaffold |
CPC, calcium phosphate cement; PLGA, poly (lactic-coglycolic acid); TCP, b-calcium phosphate; SF, Silk fbroin; HA, hydroxyapatite; PCL, poly (ε-caprolactone); PEG, poly (ethylene glycol); CS, Chitosan; PLLA, Poly (l-lactic acid); PDLLA, poly (D, l-lactic acid); CDHA, calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite; PD, polydopamine; HAMA, hyaluronic acid esterified by methacrylate; COL, collagen; PVP, polyvinylpyrrolidone; MC, mineralized collagen; TCS, Thiolated chitosan; SLN, solid lipid nanoparticles; GelMA, Gelatin methacrylate; Sr-α-CaS, strontium-calcium sulfate hemihydrate.
FIGURE 1Schematic presentation of the application of traditional Chinese medicine-loaded materials in BTE.
FIGURE 2(A) In vitro effects of naringin, reproduced with permission (Yu et al., 2020). (B) Schematic diagram of some osteogenic pathways and genes influenced by berberine, and schematic diagram of berberine inhibiting osteoclasts by affecting the binding of RANK and RANKL, reproduced with permission (Zhang et al., 2021a). (C) Schematic diagram of the bone remodeling mechanism and the role of ginsenosides, reproduced with permission (Yang N. et al., 2020). (D) Biological mechanism leading to inhibition of osteoclast differentiation of BMMs by CURCGNPs through RANKL-induced signaling pathways, reproduced with permission (Heo et al., 2014).