| Literature DB >> 35251298 |
Mahmoud Ahmad Al-Khasawneh1, Amal Bukhari2, Ahmad M Khasawneh3.
Abstract
In the past few years, big data related to healthcare has become more important, due to the abundance of data, the increasing cost of healthcare, and the privacy of healthcare. Create, analyze, and process large and complex data that cannot be processed by traditional methods. The proposed method is based on classifying data into several classes using the data weight derived from the features extracted from the big data. Three important criteria were used to evaluate the study as well as to benchmark the current study with previous studies using a standard dataset.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35251298 PMCID: PMC8890881 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6927170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Structure of big data related to machine learning in existing studies.
Figure 2Big data health care resources.
Figure 3Type of ML paradigms.
Figure 4Big data process within ML.
Figure 5Classification underweight condition.
Attribute within UCI ML dataset.
| encounter_id | patient_nbr | Race |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | age | Weight |
| admission type id | discharge disposition id | admission_source_id |
| time_in_hospital | payer_code | medical_specialty |
| numb_lab_procedures | num_procedures | num_medications |
| number_outpatient | number_emergency | number_inpatient |
| diag_1 | diag 2 | diag 3 |
| number_diagnoses | max_glu_serum | AlCresult |
| Metformin | repaglinide | Nateglinide |
| Chlorpropamide | glimepiride | Acetohexamide |
| Glipizide | glyburide | Tolbutamide |
| Pioglitazone | rosiglitazone | Acarbose |
| Migitol | troglitazone | Tolazamide |
| Examide | citoglipton | Insulin |
| glyburide-metformin | glipizide-metformin | glimepiride-pioglitazone |
| metformin-rosiglitazone diabetesMed | metformin-pioglitazone readmitted | Change |
Figure 6Database attributes after reducing.
Evaluation criteria.
| Parameters | Proposed weighted classification | DT outlier | DTI | RBF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.82 |
| Probability of detection | 0.76 | 0.7 | 0.65 | 0.87 |
|
| 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.84 |
Confusion matrix.
| Predicted class | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual class | Yes | No | Total | |
| Yes | TP | FN |
| |
| No | FP | TN |
| |
| Total |
|
|
| |