Lauren Orser1, Patrick O'Byrne2. 1. Doctoral student, University of Ottawa, School of Nursing Ottawa, Canada. 2. Professor, University of Ottawa, School of Nursing Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Ontario, provincial regulations stipulate that public health units must complete post-test counselling with all persons newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus. Public health nurses conduct this follow-up and are responsible for ensuring appropriate surveillance and management of human immunodeficiency virus with the primary objective of reducing ongoing human immunodeficiency virus transmission in their health jurisdiction. To date, little research has explored the effectiveness of this mandatory public health counselling from the perspective of patients - the majority of whom are men who have sex with men. AIMS: To address gaps in public health nursing practice, a pilot study was conducted with men who have sex with men in Ottawa to explore their attitudes and experiences of receiving mandatory human immunodeficiency virus follow-up after their diagnosis. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted and interpreted using thematic analysis. RESULTS: This analysis revealed a contrariety between the needs of individuals and of public health units, with patients' perceiving their personal wishes to be secondary to public health mandates - and led patients to simultaneously want to evade, and be assisted by, public health nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Public health units and nurses should consider adopting a more patient-centered approach to HIV case management, which incorporates patients' experiences of receiving an HIV diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: In Ontario, provincial regulations stipulate that public health units must complete post-test counselling with all persons newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus. Public health nurses conduct this follow-up and are responsible for ensuring appropriate surveillance and management of human immunodeficiency virus with the primary objective of reducing ongoing human immunodeficiency virus transmission in their health jurisdiction. To date, little research has explored the effectiveness of this mandatory public health counselling from the perspective of patients - the majority of whom are men who have sex with men. AIMS: To address gaps in public health nursing practice, a pilot study was conducted with men who have sex with men in Ottawa to explore their attitudes and experiences of receiving mandatory human immunodeficiency virus follow-up after their diagnosis. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted and interpreted using thematic analysis. RESULTS: This analysis revealed a contrariety between the needs of individuals and of public health units, with patients' perceiving their personal wishes to be secondary to public health mandates - and led patients to simultaneously want to evade, and be assisted by, public health nurses. CONCLUSIONS: Public health units and nurses should consider adopting a more patient-centered approach to HIV case management, which incorporates patients' experiences of receiving an HIV diagnosis.
Authors: Myron S Cohen; Ying Q Chen; Marybeth McCauley; Theresa Gamble; Mina C Hosseinipour; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; James G Hakim; Johnstone Kumwenda; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Jose H S Pilotto; Sheela V Godbole; Suwat Chariyalertsak; Breno R Santos; Kenneth H Mayer; Irving F Hoffman; Susan H Eshleman; Estelle Piwowar-Manning; Leslie Cottle; Xinyi C Zhang; Joseph Makhema; Lisa A Mills; Ravindre Panchia; Sharlaa Faesen; Joseph Eron; Joel Gallant; Diane Havlir; Susan Swindells; Vanessa Elharrar; David Burns; Taha E Taha; Karin Nielsen-Saines; David D Celentano; Max Essex; Sarah E Hudelson; Andrew D Redd; Thomas R Fleming Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alison J Rodger; Valentina Cambiano; Tina Bruun; Pietro Vernazza; Simon Collins; Jan van Lunzen; Giulio Maria Corbelli; Vicente Estrada; Anna Maria Geretti; Apostolos Beloukas; David Asboe; Pompeyo Viciana; Félix Gutiérrez; Bonaventura Clotet; Christian Pradier; Jan Gerstoft; Rainer Weber; Katarina Westling; Gilles Wandeler; Jan M Prins; Armin Rieger; Marcel Stoeckle; Tim Kümmerle; Teresa Bini; Adriana Ammassari; Richard Gilson; Ivanka Krznaric; Matti Ristola; Robert Zangerle; Pia Handberg; Antonio Antela; Sris Allan; Andrew N Phillips; Jens Lundgren Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zara Shubber; Edward J Mills; Jean B Nachega; Rachel Vreeman; Marcelo Freitas; Peter Bock; Sabin Nsanzimana; Martina Penazzato; Tsitsi Appolo; Meg Doherty; Nathan Ford Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Janet M Turan; Melissa A Elafros; Carmen H Logie; Swagata Banik; Bulent Turan; Kaylee B Crockett; Bernice Pescosolido; Sarah M Murray Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775