Literature DB >> 35250343

Reliable Peak Power Assessment During Concentric and Flexion-Extension-Cycle Based Rowing Strokes using a Non-Modified Rowing Ergometer.

Steffen Held1, Ludwig Rappelt1, Lars Donath1.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of peak rowing power is crucial for rowing-specific performance testing. Therefore, within and between day reliability of a non-modified rowing ergometer was examined. 52 trained male rowers (21.0 ± 2.9 years; 1.89 ± 0.05 m; 83.2 ± 8.2 kg; 2,000-m ergometer Time Trial mean power: 369 ± 57 W) performed (two times 4) isolated concentric rowing strokes (DRIVE) and single flexion-extension cycle (FEC-type) rowing strokes (SLIDE-DRIVE) on two separate days (1 week apart). Good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients (0.94 ≤ ICC ≤ 1.00), low standard error of measurement (≤ 2.7%), low coefficient of variation (≤ 4.9%), and suitable level of agreements (≤ 30W) for DRIVE and SLIDE-DRIVE indicated a high level of (within and between day) reliability. In addition, SLIDE-DRIVE (423 ± 157 W) revealed remarkably higher rowing power (p ≤ 0.001; ηp 2 = 0.601; SMD = 0.34) compared to DRIVE (370 ± 154 W). The non-modified rowing ergometer is considered to be a reliable tool for the peak power assessment during isolated concentric contraction and FEC-type rowing strokes. Notably higher power outputs (compared to an isolated concentric contraction) during FEC rowing may refer to an underlying stretch shortening cycle. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erg; oarsman; performance testing

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35250343      PMCID: PMC8851121          DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  28 in total

1.  Influence of elastic properties of tendon structures on jump performance in humans.

Authors:  K Kubo; Y Kawakami; T Fukunaga
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-12

2.  Changes in mechanical power output in rowing by varying stroke rate and gearing.

Authors:  Steffen Held; Tobias Siebert; Lars Donath
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 3.  The Difference Between Countermovement and Squat Jump Performances: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms With Practical Applications.

Authors:  Bas Van Hooren; Julia Zolotarjova
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Relationship between the efficiency of muscular work during jumping and the energetics of running.

Authors:  C Bosco; G Montanari; R Ribacchi; P Giovenali; F Latteri; G Iachelli; M Faina; R Colli; A Dal Monte; M La Rosa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

5.  Potentiation of concentric plantar flexion torque following eccentric and isometric muscle actions.

Authors:  U Svantesson; G Grimby; R Thomeé
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1994-11

Review 6.  Reliability of power in physical performance tests.

Authors:  W G Hopkins; E J Schabort; J A Hawley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Evaluation of specific anaerobic power in 12-14-year-old male rowers.

Authors:  Pavle Mikulić; Lana Ruzić; Goran Marković
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-08-31       Impact factor: 4.319

8.  The stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) revisited: residual force enhancement contributes to increased performance during fast SSCs of human m. adductor pollicis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Seiberl; Geoffrey A Power; Walter Herzog; Daniel Hahn
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.