| Literature DB >> 35249447 |
Yi Huang1, Qin Wu1, Xiaoqing Tan1.
Abstract
Cervical cancer represents one of the most important female genital cancers. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC) accounts for about 90% of all cervical malignancies and the prognosis are unsatisfied. Here we aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of metallothionein-like 5 (MTL5), a novel metallothionein-like protein, in CESC. RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry staining showed that MTL5 was upregulated in CESC tissues than nontumorous cervix tissues, which is consistent with the data from TCGA database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that higher MTL5 can help predict worse prognosis. In addition, Cox hazard regression analysis verified an independent predictive role of MTL5 in CESC. To further investigate the involvement of MTL5 in CESC, we conducted knockdown experiments in two CESC cell lines. As a result, silencing MTL5g significantly inhibited proliferation of CESC cells. Finally, we validated that silencing MTL5 can suppress CESC tumor growth in vivo using the mice subcutaneous xenografts model. Taken together, higher MTL5 indicates worse survival of CESC after surgical resection. Targeting MTL5 represents a potential therapy of CESC by inhibiting tumor growth, which deserves further investigations.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical squamous cell carcinoma; metallothionein-like 5; prognostic biomarker; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35249447 PMCID: PMC8973634 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2036901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Correlations between MTL5 and clinicopathologic characteristics
| Variables | Cases | MTL5 protein level | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (n=50) | High (n=83) | |||
| Age (year) | 0.407 | |||
| < 45 | 62 | 21 | 41 | |
| ≥ 45 | 71 | 29 | 42 | |
| Horizontal diffusion diameter | 0.002* | |||
| < 4.0 cm | 90 | 42 | 48 | |
| ≥ 4.0 cm | 43 | 8 | 35 | |
| Stromal invasion depth | 0.089 | |||
| < 2/3 | 78 | 34 | 44 | |
| ≥ 2/3 | 55 | 16 | 39 | |
| Vagina invasion | 0.214 | |||
| Negative | 101 | 35 | 66 | |
| Positive | 32 | 15 | 17 | |
| Parametrial invasion | 0.445 | |||
| Negative | 96 | 38 | 58 | |
| Positive | 37 | 12 | 25 | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.111 | |||
| Negative | 90 | 38 | 52 | |
| Positive | 43 | 12 | 31 | |
| Pathological differentiation | 0.432 | |||
| Well | 21 | 8 | 13 | |
| Moderate | 99 | 35 | 64 | |
| Poor | 13 | 7 | 6 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.005* | |||
| Negative | 78 | 37 | 41 | |
| Positive | 55 | 13 | 42 | |
| FIGO stage | <0.001* | |||
| Stage I | 72 | 39 | 33 | |
| Stage II | 61 | 11 | 50 | |
* indicates P<0.05 with statistical significance.
Figure 1.mRNA and protein expression of MTL5 in CESC.
Disease-free survival (DFS) analyses by Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test
| Variables | Cases | 5-year DFS rate | Mean DFS (months) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.070 | |||
| < 45 | 62 | 32.9% | 56.0 ± 4.6 | |
| ≥ 45 | 71 | 55.9% | 63.6 ± 4.8 | |
| Horizontal diffusion diameter | 0.041* | |||
| < 4.0 cm | 90 | 49.0% | 63.0 ± 4.1 | |
| ≥ 4.0 cm | 43 | 27.6% | 42.3 ± 4.9 | |
| Stromal invasion depth | 0.034* | |||
| < 2/3 | 78 | 49.9% | 64.3 ± 4.4 | |
| ≥ 2/3 | 55 | 32.6% | 47.4 ± 4.2 | |
| Vagina invasion | 0.357 | |||
| Negative | 101 | 42.5% | 59.8 ± 3.8 | |
| Positive | 32 | 42.5% | 53.4 ± 6.7 | |
| Parametrial invasion | <0.001* | |||
| Negative | 96 | 52.3% | 68.0 ± 4.1 | |
| Positive | 37 | 20.5% | 39.9 ± 4.3 | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.013* | |||
| Negative | 90 | 48.9% | 64.8 ± 4.1 | |
| Positive | 43 | 30.3% | 46.0 ± 4.8 | |
| Pathological differentiation | 0.273 | |||
| Well | 21 | 53.0% | 60.4 ± 5.8 | |
| Moderate | 99 | 41.9% | 58.5 ± 4.0 | |
| Poor | 13 | 25.2% | 35.7 ± 4.9 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.005* | |||
| Negative | 78 | 50.7% | 67.4 ± 4.5 | |
| Positive | 55 | 30.6% | 45.7 ± 4.0 | |
| FIGO stage | <0.001* | |||
| Stage I | 72 | 57.2% | 69.3 ± 4.5 | |
| Stage II | 61 | 19.2% | 43.7 ± 3.8 | |
| MTL5 expression | <0.001* | |||
| Low | 50 | 63.0% | 74.0 ± 4.9 | |
| High | 83 | 28.3% | 42.9 ± 2.6 |
* indicates P<0.05 with statistical significance.
Figure 2.Disease-free survival analyses of CESC cohort.
Figure 3.The mRNA level of MTL5 and its clinical significance in TCGA database.
Multivariate analysis by Cox regression model
| Variables | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.649 | 0.383-1.101 | 0.109 |
| Horizontal diffusion diameter | 1.028 | 0.578-1.827 | 0.926 |
| Stromal invasion depth | 1.378 | 0.814-2.334 | 0.232 |
| Parametrial invasion | 1.866 | 1.030-3.380 | 0.040* |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 1.481 | 0.872-2.514 | 0.146 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.361 | 0.765-2.422 | 0.294 |
| FIGO stage | 1.829 | 1.040-3.217 | 0.036* |
| MTL5 expression | 1.961 | 1.034-3.720 | 0.039* |
* indicates P<0.05 with statistical significance.
Figure 4.The effects of MTL5 on CESC proliferation and growth.