Literature DB >> 3524615

Gastrointestinal microflora in mammalian nutrition.

D C Savage.   

Abstract

A mammal is a complex organism consisting of eukaryotic animal cells and eukaryotic and prokaryotic microbial cells. Most of the microorganisms reside in communities in the gastrointestinal tract. These gastrointestinal microfloras are known to serve nutritional functions in ruminants, pseudoruminants, and monogastric mammals with only modest or no foregut fermentations but with extensive hindgut fermentations in blind cecal pouches. In adult animals, the microflora hydrolyzes exogenous (dietary) and endogenous polymers, and provides the adult with all or at least a significant proportion of its carbon, energy, vitamins, and macromolecular building blocks. The flora also functions as a conservator of nitrogen that would otherwise be excreted as urea. In exchange, the flora competes directly with the host tissues for nutrients ingested in the diet, and also competes indirectly by somewhat repressing the absorptive capacities of the animal tissues. When the synergism is in balance, the animal tissues and the microflora operate in harmony for the health and nutritional welfare of the host as a whole. The system may be unbalanced by antibacterial drugs that destroy the microflora and by diseases of the animal tissues that destroy the controls regulating where indigenous communities localize in the tract, their microbial composition, and their biochemical activities. At such times, the nutrition of the animal tissues can be adversely affected to the extreme. Humans living in developed and developing countries have extensive microfloras in their hindguts. Humans living in developing countries may also have extensive microfloras in their small bowels. Those floras may function in nutrition of the animal tissues of man much the same as do floras in similar locations in the gastrointestinal tracts of mammals other than man. However, animals of some species other than human gain much of the nutritional benefit from their microflora through the practice of coprophagy. Since adult humans do not normally practice coprophagy, any nutritional benefit from the microflora depends upon the capacity of the bowel mucosa, principally that of the large bowel, to absorb bacterial products, e.g. short-chain volatile fatty acids. Such absorption undoubtedly occurs, but is surely not a major source of carbon and energy for the animal tissues of man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3524615     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nu.06.070186.001103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr        ISSN: 0199-9885            Impact factor:   11.848


  38 in total

1.  Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffery S. Meyers; Eli D. Ehrenpreis; Robert M. Craig
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Tools for the tract: understanding the functionality of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Petia Kovatcheva-Datchary; Erwin G Zoetendal; Koen Venema; Willem M de Vos; Hauke Smidt
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Characterization of the microbial community colonizing the anal and vulvar pores of helminths from the hindgut of zebras.

Authors:  R I Mackie; R C Krecek; H J Els; J P van Niekerk; L M Kirschner; A A Baecker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Molecular diversity, cultivation, and improved detection by fluorescent in situ hybridization of a dominant group of human gut bacteria related to Roseburia spp. or Eubacterium rectale.

Authors:  Rustam I Aminov; Alan W Walker; Sylvia H Duncan; Hermie J M Harmsen; Gjalt W Welling; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Estimation of the metabolizable energy equivalence of dietary proteins.

Authors:  Raquel Ferrer-Lorente; José Antonio Fernández-López; Marià Alemany
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Anaerobiosis, type 1 fimbriae, and growth phase are factors that affect invasion of HEp-2 cells by Salmonella typhimurium.

Authors:  R K Ernst; D M Dombroski; J M Merrick
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Impact of nutritional factors on the proteome of intestinal Escherichia coli: induction of OxyR-dependent proteins AhpF and Dps by a lactose-rich diet.

Authors:  Monique Rothe; Carl Alpert; Wolfram Engst; Stephanie Musiol; Gunnar Loh; Michael Blaut
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The nonfermentable dietary fiber hydroxypropyl methylcellulose modulates intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Laura M Cox; Ilseung Cho; Scott A Young; W H Kerr Anderson; Bartholomew J Waters; Shao-Ching Hung; Zhan Gao; Douglas Mahana; Monika Bihan; Alexander V Alekseyenko; Barbara A Methé; Martin J Blaser
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Roles of interferon produced in physiological conditions. A speculative review.

Authors:  V Bocci
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.397

10.  Seasonal variation in nutrient utilization shapes gut microbiome structure and function in wild giant pandas.

Authors:  Qi Wu; Xiao Wang; Yun Ding; Yibo Hu; Yonggang Nie; Wei Wei; Shuai Ma; Li Yan; Lifeng Zhu; Fuwen Wei
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.