Literature DB >> 35246009

Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores.

Marcus Mund1,2, Marlies Maes3,4,5, Pia M Drewke1,2, Antonia Gutzeit2, Isabel Jaki2, Pamela Qualter6.   

Abstract

Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 (N = 1,216 individuals from 608 couples), we investigated convergent validity, self-informant agreement, and nomological nets of the item scores using correlates related to demographic aspects, personality, satisfaction, and network characteristics. In Study 3 (N = 411), we estimated a reliability of rxx>.70 for scores of three single-item measures of loneliness. Overall, scores of all measures and their nomological nets were highly correlated within and across studies, indicating that the scores of the included measures are all reliable and valid. Recommendations for choosing a loneliness measure are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale; University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale; loneliness; nomological net; self-other agreement; single-item measures; validity

Year:  2022        PMID: 35246009     DOI: 10.1177/10731911221077227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  4 in total

1.  The Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Novel, On-Line Social Skills Intervention for Individuals With Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Dykens; Elizabeth Roof; Hailee Hunt-Hawkins; Charles McDonald
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  From Physical Distancing to Social Loneliness among Gay Men and Other Men Having Sex with Men in Belgium: Examining the Disruption of the Social Network and Social Support Structures.

Authors:  Estrelle Thunnissen; Veerle Buffel; Thijs Reyniers; Christiana Nöstlinger; Edwin Wouters
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Different loneliness types, cognitive function, and brain structure in midlife: Findings from the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  Qiushan Tao; Samia C Akhter-Khan; Ting Fang Alvin Ang; Charles DeCarli; Michael L Alosco; Jesse Mez; Ronald Killiany; Sherral Devine; Ami Rokach; Indira Swetha Itchapurapu; Xiaoling Zhang; Kathryn L Lunetta; David C Steffens; Lindsay A Farrer; Douglas N Greve; Rhoda Au; Wei Qiao Qiu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-09-06

Review 4.  How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.

Authors:  Marlies Maes; Pamela Qualter; Gerine M A Lodder; Marcus Mund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.