Literature DB >> 3524513

Comparison of clinic, home, and deferred language treatment for aphasia. A Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.

R T Wertz, D G Weiss, J L Aten, R H Brookshire, L García-Buñuel, A L Holland, J F Kurtzke, L L LaPointe, F J Milianti, R Brannegan.   

Abstract

Aphasic patients who met stringent selection criteria were assigned randomly to three groups: clinic treatment by a speech pathologist for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of no treatment; home treatment by a trained volunteer for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of no treatment; or deferred treatment for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of treatment by a speech pathologist. At 12 weeks after entry, language measures indicated that the clinic-treatment patients made significantly more improvement than did the deferred-treatment patients, and improvement in home-treatment patients did not differ significantly from either clinic- or deferred-treatment patients. At 24 weeks after entry, after deferred-treatment patients had received clinic treatment, there were no significant differences among the groups. These results suggest that clinic treatment for aphasia is efficacious, and delaying treatment for 12 weeks does not compromise ultimate improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3524513     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520070011008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  16 in total

Review 1.  Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: the science and the state of the science.

Authors:  Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 2.  Formal rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  N Freemantle; C Pollock; T A Sheldon; J M Mason; F Song; A F Long; S Ibbotson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-06

Review 3.  [Present status and future possibilities of adjuvant pharmacotherapy for aphasia].

Authors:  C Korsukewitz; C Breitenstein; M Schomacher; S Knecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Trials and tribulations in speech therapy.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-11

Review 5.  Speech and language therapy: does it work?

Authors:  P Enderby; J Emerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-29

6.  [Comparison of early and late rehabilitation of stroke and cerebral trauma patients with visual field defects].

Authors:  I Müller; B Sabel; E Kasten
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Poststroke aphasia : epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment.

Authors:  Marcelo L Berthier
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  A physician survey of poststroke aphasia diagnosis and treatment in China: SPEECH study.

Authors:  Yuying Zhou; Xiaoxia Du; Jun Xiao; Yunpeng Cao; Qihao Guo; Aihong Zhou; Jiong Zhou; Nan Li; Yinhua Wang; Lifei Jiao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Variability in recovery from aphasia.

Authors:  Ronald M Lazar; Daniel Antoniello
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 10.  Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke.

Authors:  Marian C Brady; Helen Kelly; Jon Godwin; Pam Enderby; Pauline Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.