| Literature DB >> 35244725 |
Iñigo Moreno-Ocio1, Leire Méndez-Fernández2, Maite Martínez-Madrid2, Noemí Costas3, Isabel Pardo3, Pilar Rodriguez4.
Abstract
The study was performed on residue-effects datasets from polluted and unpolluted sites in the Nalón River basin (northern Spain). The effects were measured in terms of alteration of field macroinvertebrate communities, and measured as ecological status scores, and number of families and abundance of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera (EPT). Non-linear regression models of the field-measured tissue residues in 10 taxa related to the ecological status of the macroinvertebrate communities were used to derive effective tissue residues (ERs). These were estimated for the good/moderate boundary defined by the ecological quality ratio (EQRs) score and for the 50% reduction of EQR and EPT metrics. As, Cu, Hg and Se ERs were calculated for several macroinvertebrate taxa with different feeding styles. The ER dataset allowed us to estimate As and Cu hazardous concentrations (HC), using species sensitivity distribution models, and were interpreted as community thresholds. Further studies for Hg and Se are needed to complete the database required for HC estimation. The reliability and differences of the several thresholds were tested in a risk assessment using a tissue-residue approach (TRA) conducted with field organisms from Cauxa Creek, a tributary from the same basin exposed to high levels of metals in the sediments due to gold mining activities. This risk assessment identified that As and Cu tissue residues satisfactorily explained the reduction in the ecological status of the macroinvertebrate assemblages. Our results indicate that TRA can help in setting future environmental quality standards for the protection of aquatic biota.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35244725 PMCID: PMC8971172 DOI: 10.1007/s00244-022-00915-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol ISSN: 0090-4341 Impact factor: 2.804
Fig. 1Scheme of the construction of the dose—response models between tissue concentration of the metal and the EQR (circles). The blue line is the ETTC value; the red lines are the EQR = 0.700 change point between Good and Moderate ecological status (G/M boundary) and the corresponding effective tissue concentration (ERGM). Superimposed are the black lines that represent the effective tissue concentration (ER50) related to the 50% reduction of the EPT indexes
Mean effective tissue residues (ERs) (µg g−1 dw) calculated for As, Cu, Hg and Se from non-linear regression models of the tissue concentration and the EQR for each site and taxon
| Mean METI–EQR versus TR regression models | Mean NORTI–EQR versus TR regression models | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxon | EQR–ER50 | EQR–ERGM | Mean ERGM/ETTC | EQR–ER50 | EQR–ERGM | Mean ERGM/ETTC |
| As | ||||||
| Baetidae | 71.0 (32.1–186) | 41.6 (37.3–52.2) | 13.4 | 99.5 (51.5–123) | 18.9 (16.3–21.7) | 6.1 |
| Ephemerellidae | – | 67.7 (66.7–68.7) | 10.5 | – | 35.5 | 5.5 |
| Ephemeridae | – | – | – | – | 44.3 | 6.9 |
| Heptageniidae | – | 48.6 (47.6–49.4) | 7.7 | 7.8 (7.6–8.0) | 9.0 (8.0–10.8) | 2.3 |
| Hydropsychidae | 16.1 (2.6–29.5) | – | – | – | 25.5 (23.1–27.8) | 12.7 |
| Lumbricidae | 17.2 | 19.1 | 1.4 | 84.9 (83.5–86.2) | 85.7 (84.5–86.9) | 6.2 |
| Microdrile | 561 | 243.1 (230–256) | 16.8 | 542.4 (509–570) | 109.4 (79.0–126) | 7.6 |
| Rhyacophilidae | 11.1 (10.7–11.7) | 7.1 (6.9–7.4) | 4.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| Perlidae | – | – | – | – | 2.6 | 1.5 |
| Simuliidae | 120 | 269 (196–341) | 59.8 | – | 17.8 | 4.0 |
| Cu | ||||||
| Baetidae | 39.2 | 104.5 | 3.6 | 33.6 (32.8–34.6) | 38.1 (36.6–39.6) | 1.3 |
| Ephemerellidae | 237 (236–240) | 194 (191–199) | 6.5 | – | 134.4 | 1.5 |
| Ephemeridae | 37.0 (36.5–37.8) | – | – | 19.1 (16.2–21.0) | 22.9 (16.5–27.3) | 1.4 |
| Heptageniidae | 220 (199–241) | 409.7 (407–414) | 5.1 | 98.1 (97–100) | 158 (156–160) | 2.0 |
| Hydropsychidae | – | – | – | 15.6 (15.3–15.9) | 18.5 (17.9–19.1) | 1.2 |
| Lumbricidae | 146 (145–147) | 82.4 (77.7–86.8) | 7.1 | 208 | 45.7 | 4.0 |
| Microdrile | 36.0 (35.7–36.4) | 37.7 (37.3–38.1) | 1.8 | 31.6 (30.1–33.0) | 30.9 (29.6–32.2) | 1.5 |
| Perlidae | 118 (105–131) | 98.5 (97.7–99.3) | 2.9 | – | – | – |
| Rhyacophilidae | 67.1 | 51.2 (49.5–52.5) | 2.6 | 32.2 (31.9–32.5) | 39.4 (32.9–44.7) | 2.0 |
| Simuliidae | – | – | – | 15.8 (15.5–16.1) | 37.2 (36.4–37.9) | 0.7 |
| Hg | ||||||
| Baetidae | – | 3.6 | 13.7 | – | – | – |
| Ephemeridae | 0.05 | – | – | 0.10 | – | – |
| Heptageniidae | – | – | – | 0.06 (0.06–0.07) | – | – |
| Perlidae | – | – | – | 0.07 (0.06–0.07) | – | – |
| Rhyacophilidae | 0.60 | 0.59 | 1.2 | 0.23 (0.21–0.24) | 0.35 (0.34–0.36) | 0.7 |
| Simuliidae | – | 7.9 (7.8–8.0) | 13.1 | – | 0.97 (0.96–0.97) | 1.6 |
| Se | ||||||
| Baetidae | – | 20.1 (18.7–22.1) | 1.8 | 15.2 (14.8–15.6) | 8.7 (8.6–8.7) | 0.7 |
| Heptageniidae | – | – | – | 3.4 (3.2–3.5) | – | – |
| Hydropsychidae | 3.0 | – | – | 1.1 (0.9–1.1) | – | – |
| Microdrile | 7.1 (6.6–7.6) | 16.8 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 5.9 | 0.8 |
Their ranges are given when n > 1. EQR-ER50 was calculated as the tissue residues corresponding to a 50% reduction in the EQR score. EQR-ERGM was estimated from the models for the official EQR value used as the boundary between good and moderate ecological status of the macroinvertebrate assemblages. Ratios of the ERGM to the baseline ETTC are shown. ETTC, ecological threshold tissue concentration; TR, tissue residues
Effective tissue residues (ER50) of As, Cu, Hg and Se (µg g−1 dw) related to the 50% reduction in the EPT number of families (EPT Fam) and the EPT abundance (EPT Ab)
| As | Cu | Hg | Se | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxon | EPT Fam–ER50 | EPT Ab–ER50 | EPT Fam–ER50 | EPT Ab–ER50 | EPT Fam–ER50 | EPT Ab–ER50 | EPT Fam–ER50 | EPT Ab–ER50 |
| Baetidae | 24.1 | 11.4 | – | – | – | – | 19.5 | 5.7 |
| Ephemerellidae | 92.1 | 8.4 | 237.2 | 192.0 | 0.06 | – | – | – |
| Ephemeridae | 20.5 | – | 38.0 | – | 0.14 | 0.61 | – | – |
| Heptageniidae | 8.1 | 18.1 | – | – | – | – | – | 4.8 |
| Hydropsychidae | 107.7 | – | 16.7 | – | – | – | 2.1 | 4.3 |
| Lumbricidae | 16.7 | – | – | 32.8 | – | – | 10.0 | 14.9 |
| Microdrile oligochaetes | 318.7 | 85.5 | – | 55.1 | – | 0.72 | 4.4 | 8.0 |
| Perlidae | – | – | 167.8 | 77.6 | – | 0.06 | – | – |
| Rhyacophilidae | 8.1 | 1.5 | – | 42.4 | – | – | – | 1.1 |
| Simuliidae | 171.5 | 8.4 | – | – | – | 0.72 | – | – |
| ER50/ETTC ratio | 1.2–53.9 | 1.3–5.9 | 1.1–2.7 | 0.3–2.8 | 0.2–0.3 | 0.0–1.2 | 0.5–1.6 | 0.2–1.1 |
| Mean | 16.9 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 0.25 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
ER50 are calculated as the mean ER50 values estimated per taxon from the validated regression models. Abbreviations: EPT, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera; ETTC, Ecological Threshold Tissue Concentration
Fig. 2Arsenic dose—response models for METI- and NORTI-EQRs calculated for several taxa (Baetidae, Ephemerellidae, Lumbricidae and Rhyacophilidae) selected from sites in the Nalón River basin. Superimposed lines mark the low and high threshold values. The low threshold is in all instances the baseline concentration in the basin (ETTC), in blue. There are several parameters useful as high thresholds: METI- and NORTI-ERGM in red. For comparison, the ER50 values calculated when possible for the 50% reduction of EPT number of families and abundances are also superimposed in black-dashed line and in black-dotted line, respectively. The represented regression models are indicated on the upper right corner of each plot
Fig. 3Copper dose—response models for METI- and NORTI-EQRs calculated for several taxa (Baetidae, Ephemerellidae, Lumbricidae and Rhyacophilidae) selected from sites in the Nalón River basin. Superimposed lines mark the low and high threshold values. The low threshold is in all instances the baseline concentration in the basin (ETTC), in blue. There are several parameters useful as high thresholds: METI- and NORTI-ERGM in red. For comparison, the ER50 values calculated when possible for the 50% reduction of EPT number of families and abundances are also superimposed in black-dashed line and in black-dotted line, respectively. The represented regression models are indicated on the upper right corner of each plot
Hazard concentrations (HC5, HC50) for As and Cu and their 90% confidence limits (CL) derived from SSD models using several effective tissue concentrations (ER)
| Chemical | HC | EQR-ERGM (90% CL) | EQR-ER50 (90% CL) | EPT-ER50 (90% CL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | HC5 | 2.41 | 17 | 1.67 | 11 | 2.12 | 15 |
| (0.74–5.27) | (0.20–5.74) | (0.59–4.82) | |||||
| HC50 | 27.98 | 41.05 | 24.13 | ||||
| (15.06–51.97) | (14.62–115.3) | (12.50–46.58) | |||||
| As ETTC-HC50 | 4.24 (2.46 –7.30) | ||||||
| Cu | HC5 | 15.45 | 16 | 11.63 | 16 | 14.31 | 9 |
| (7.52–24.70) | (5.25–19.51) | (4.32–27.48) | |||||
| HC50 | 64.62 | 56.40 | 67.43 | ||||
| (44.47–93.89) | (37.34–85.20) | (38.44–118.3) | |||||
| Cu ETTC-HC50 | 29.16 (19.23–44.21) |
EQR-ERGM: Effective tissue residues related to the EQR boundary between Good and Moderate ecological status of the macroinvertebrate community; EQR-ER50: Effective tissue residues related to the 50% reduction in the EQR; EPT-ER50: Effective tissue residues related to the 50% reduction of the EPT metrics of abundance and richness. For comparison, the HC50 derived from the baseline concentrations of As and Cu in unpolluted reference sites is given (ETTC-HC50, Rodriguez et al. 2018). n: number of data included in each of the models
Cauxa river risk assessment based on the mean ratios of the tissue residues in biomonitor taxa to metal thresholds
The effective tissue residues (EQR-ERGM) and the community hazard concentration (HC50) were used as high thresholds. The ratios are classified within the following classes: Low Risk (≤ 1) in blue, Moderate Risk (1.1–2.0) in yellow, High Risk (2.1–10.0) in orange and Very High Risk (> 10) in red. The ecological status of the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in the four sites of the Cauxa River assessed by the METI and NORTI EQRs are shown in blue (Good) and yellow (Moderate)