| Literature DB >> 35244531 |
Ming Yang1,2, Qiong Xue1,3, Zhenqiang Zuo1,3, Jian Zhou1, Shengjie Zhang1,3, Ming Li1, Heng Zhou1, Manqi Zhang1,3, Sumit Kumar4, Wei Li2, Guiying Chen2, Dahe Zhao1, Hua Xiang1,3.
Abstract
A haloalkaliphilic strain (IM 1326T) was isolated from brine sampled at a soda lake in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China. Cells of the strain were rod-shaped and motile. Strain IM 1326T was able to grow at 4-42 °C (optimum, 37 °C) with 0-13.0 % (w/v) NaCl concentrations (optimum at 4.0-6.0 %) and at pH 7.5-11.0 (optimum at 9.0-10.0). The 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis revealed that the isolate belongs to the genus Aliidiomarina and is closely related to the type strains of Aliidiomarina sanyensis (95.8 % sequence similarity), Aliidiomarina shirensis (95.7 %), Aliidiomarina iranensis (95.4 %) and Aliidiomarina haloalkalitolerans (95.3 %). The whole genome of strain IM 1326T was sequenced, and the genomic DNA G+C content was 49.7 mol%. Average nucleotide identity, average amino acid identity and digital DNA-DNA hybridization values between the isolate and the related Aliidiomarina species were 68.1-84.9 %, 76-78 % and 18.4-20.4 %, respectively. The respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-8. The polar lipid profile included diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and one unidentified aminophospholipid. The predominant cellular fatty acids were summed feature 9 (10-methyl-C16 : 0/iso-C17 : 1 ω9c, 22.2 %), iso-C15 : 0 (16.1 %) and iso-C17 : 0 (13.1 %). Based on the results of phylogenetic analysis, genome relatedness, and the physiological and chemotaxonomic properties of the isolate, strain IM 1326T is considered to represent a novel species of the genus Aliidiomarina, for which the name Aliidiomarina halalkaliphila sp. nov. is proposed (type strain IM 1326T=CGMCC 1.17056T=JCM 34227T).Entities:
Keywords: Aliidiomarina; haloalkaliphilic bacterium; polyphasic taxonomy; soda lake; whole-genome sequence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35244531 PMCID: PMC9558577 DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ISSN: 1466-5026 Impact factor: 2.689
Fig. 1.Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between strain IM 1326T and related taxa. Bootstrap values (based on 1000 replicates) of more than 70 % are shown at the branching point. The sequence of KCTC 2441T was used as an outgroup. GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Differentiating characteristics of strain IM 1326T and the ten type strains of the genus
Strains: 1, IM 1326T (data from this study); 2, . CGMCC 1.15255T; 3, . DSM 24939T; 4, . GYP-17T; 5, AIST; 6, MLST1T; 7, GBPy7T; 8, Y4G10-17T; 9, CF12-14T; 10, F3105T; 11, GBSy1T. +, Positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive; nd, not detected; DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; PE: phosphatidylethanolamine; APL, unidentified aminophospholipid; PL, unidentified phospholipid. DNA G+C content of strain IM 1326T was obtained from the genomic sequence. Data for . CGMCC 1.15255T, and . DSM 24939T were taken from Srinivas et al. [2], and some experiments were repeated under identical conditions (marked by *). Data for other species were taken from the literature: GYP-17T [6], AIST [3], MLST1T [4], GBPy7T [5], Y4G10-17T [7], . CF12-14T [8], . F3105T [9], and GBSy1T [10].
|
Characteristics |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cell size (um) |
0.3–0.6×0.8–2.1 |
0.4–0.86×1.5–3.0 |
0.8–1.06×1.0–1.5 |
0.4–0.56×0.7–2.0 |
0.8–1.76×0.4–0.5 |
0.4–1.0×1.0–3.0 |
0.6–0.96×1.8–2.2 |
0.1–0.3×1.2–2.4 |
0.3–0.6×0.8–2.4 |
0.6–0.9×1.5–2.6 |
0.3–0.4×1.2–1.7 |
|
Colony colour |
Light brown |
Light brown* |
Creamish* |
Dark brown |
Pale yellow |
Cream |
Buttery |
Yellow |
White to light yellow |
Brown |
Non-pigmented |
|
Salinity growth range (%) |
0–13.0 |
0.5–10.0* |
0.5–12.0* |
1.0–10.0 |
0.5–15.0 |
0–15.0 |
1.0–15.0 |
1.0–14.0 |
1.0–15.0 |
1.0–8.0 |
1.0–15.0 |
|
Optimum salinity for growth (%) |
4.0–6.0 |
1.5–5.0* |
0.5–5.0* |
3.0–7.0 |
1.0–10.0 |
7.0–10.0 |
3.0 |
1.0–5.0 |
2.0–3.0 |
2.0–3.0 |
5.0 |
|
Temperature range for growth (°C) |
4–42 |
4–40* |
10–50* |
10–45 |
1–45 |
10–45 |
4–45 |
4–45 |
4–42 |
4–45 |
4–40 |
|
Optimum temperature for growth (°C) |
37 |
30–40* |
30–37* |
30 |
30–35 |
30 |
37 |
30 |
30–35 |
37 |
34 |
|
pH range for growth |
7.5–11.0 |
7.0–11.0* |
7.0–11.0* |
7.0–9.0 |
5.0–9.5 |
6.0–11.0 |
7.0–10.0 |
6.0–12.0 |
6.0–11.5 |
6.5–9.5 |
7.0–10.0 |
|
Optimum pH for growth |
9.0–10.0 |
8.0* |
8.0–10.0* |
8.0 |
7.5–8.0 |
9.5 |
8.5 |
9.0 |
8.0–9.5 |
7.5 |
8.5 |
|
Indole production |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Utilization of carbon sources: | |||||||||||
|
|
− |
+* |
|
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+* |
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+* |
|
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
|
Lactose |
− |
+* |
-* |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Maltose |
− |
+* |
|
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+* |
+* |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
− |
+* |
-* |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Glycerol |
− |
+* |
+* |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Ribose |
− |
+* |
-* |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Sucrose |
− |
+* |
|
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
Trehalose |
− |
+* |
|
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
|
+ |
+* |
-* |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Hydrolysis of: | |||||||||||
|
Tween 80 |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ | |
|
Quinone composition |
Q-8 |
Q-8, Q-9* |
Q-8 |
Q-8 |
Q-8, Q-7 |
Q-8 |
Q-8 |
Q-8, Q-9 |
Q-8 |
Q-8 |
Q-8, Q-9, Q-10 |
|
Major polar lipids |
DPG, PG, PE, APL |
DPG, PE, PG, PL5, APL1* |
DPG, PE, PG, PL1–PL4* |
PE, PL1–PL3 |
DPG, PG, PE, PL |
DPG, PG, PE |
PG, DPG, PE, PL1, APL1 |
DPG, PG, PE |
DPG, PG, PE |
DPG, PG, PE, AL, APL1–2, L1–2 |
DPG, PG, PE, PL1–PL3 |
|
DNA G+C content (mol%) |
49.7 |
48.7 |
49.3 |
50.8 |
46.3 |
48.7 |
46.8 |
49.6 |
50.1 |
51.6 |
52.1 |
*Determined in this study.
Genome relatedness based on average nucleotide identity (ANI), average amino acid identity (AAI), and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values among strain IM 1326T and species of the genus .
Strain: 1, IM 1326T; 2, . CGMCC 1.15255T; 3, . DSM 24939T; 4, . GYP-17T; 5, A. AIST; 6, MLST1T; 7, GBPy7T; 8, Y4G10-17T; 9, CF12-14T; 10, F3105T; 11, GBSy1T. ANIb and ANIm values were calculated by blast and MUMmer algorithms, respectively. AAI values were calculated by ANI/AAI-Matrix. dDDH values were obtained by calculating genome-to-genome distance.
|
ANIb |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
– | ||||||||||
|
|
68.2 |
– | |||||||||
|
|
70.6 |
68.7 |
– | ||||||||
|
|
72.6 |
68.2 |
70.5 |
– | |||||||
|
|
70.8 |
68.3 |
71.0 |
70.1 |
– | ||||||
|
|
68.1 |
67.3 |
68.3 |
67.7 |
68.3 |
– | |||||
|
|
70.6 |
68.2 |
71.0 |
69.7 |
78.2 |
68.3 |
– | ||||
|
|
68.1 |
67.6 |
68.5 |
68.0 |
68.1 |
70.0 |
68.1 |
– | |||
|
|
68.5 |
68.0 |
69.2 |
68.4 |
68.5 |
70.1 |
68.6 |
71.5 |
– | ||
|
|
69.0 |
69.9 |
69.7 |
68.8 |
69.3 |
67.9 |
69.4 |
68.1 |
69.0 |
– | |
|
|
68.1 |
67.4 |
68.5 |
68.1 |
68.2 |
71.0 |
68.1 |
95.1 |
71.5 |
68.2 |
– |
Fig. 2.Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 120 bacterial conserved single-copy gene sequences showing the relationship between strain IM 1326T and related taxa. Bootstrap values (based on 1000 replicates) of more than 70 % are shown at the branching point. The sequence of K-12 substr. MG1655T was used as an outgroup. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per amino acid position.