| Literature DB >> 35243382 |
Lei Wei1, Shuailin Li2, Xiaowo Wang1.
Abstract
Characterizing the noise modulation pattern of microRNA is valuable for both microRNA function analysis and synthetic biology applications. Here we propose a coarse-grained model to simulate how the properties of microRNAs, competing RNAs, and microRNA response elements affect gene expression noise. We also detail an experimental protocol based on synthetic gene circuits and flow cytometry to quantify the noise. This framework is easy-to-use for the study and application of both microRNA and gene expression noise. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Wei et al. (2021).Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Computer sciences; Flow Cytometry/Mass Cytometry; Gene Expression; Molecular Biology; Systems biology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35243382 PMCID: PMC8885741 DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: STAR Protoc ISSN: 2666-1667
Figure 1The bidirectional promoter system
Figure 2The definition of parameters for simulation
The number represent the order of reactions for calculating their contributions in step 3. Reactions employed in each miRNA regulation model are shown. Types of all components and reactions are shown with different colors, shapes and line types.
Figure 3An example of the visualized simulation results
Expression and CV represent the average gene expression level and noise level (CV) of the gene regulated by miRNA. Fold change represents the difference of gene expression level between the condition with and without the regulation of miRNA. Expression and fold change are shown in a logarithmic scale. This figure shows the simulation result of miRNA regulation model 1 (with competing RNAs). Condition 1 represents the result without miRNAs (kR = 0); condition 2 represents the result with miRNAs but without competing RNAs (kR > 0, kT2 = 0); condition 3 represents the result with miRNAs and strong competing RNAs (kR > 0, kT2 > 0, small koff2); condition 4 represents the results with miRNAs and weak competing RNAs (kR > 0, kT2 > 0, large koff2).
Figure 4An example of the visualized flow cytometry experiment results
EYFP_mean and mKate2_mean represent the average gene expression level of EYFP and mKate2 in each bin. All the mean values are shown in a logarithmic scale. EYFP_CV represents the noise level (CV) of EYFP in each bin.
| REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
|---|---|---|
| Doxycycline (Dox) | Clontech | #631311 |
| Lipofectamine™ LTX Reagent with PLUS™ Reagent | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #A12621 |
| Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), high glucose | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #11965092 |
| Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #10437028 |
| MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (NEAA) (100×) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #11140050 |
| Penicillin-Streptomycin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #15140122 |
| Trypsin-EDTA (0.05%), phenol red | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #25300120 |
| Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | #10010023 |
| HeLa | ATCC | CCL-2 |
| microRNA response elements | N/A | |
| Dual-fluorescent reporter systems | GenBank: MZ542768 | |
| pDT7004 | N/A | |
| Executable model code and scripts | This paper | |
| MATLAB (R2020b) | MathWorks | RRID: |
| R (v 3.6.1) | R Core Team | RRID: |
| Floreada.io | Floreada Devs | |
| BD LSRFortessa™ cell analyzer | BD Biosciences | |