Linde Snoek1, Merijn W Bijlsma1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1100 DD, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Paediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1100 DD, the Netherlands.
We thank Francesca Miselli and colleagues for their interest in our study. The authors wonder if screening for GBS could lead to lower rates of neonatal early-onset meningitis. Screening would identify more women colonized by GBS, which would increase rates of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). They ask: did the mothers of the meningitis cases with delayed (>24 h) treatment receive IAP?All of 88 patients in our cohort had a positive blood culture and 11 (13%) also had a positive CSF culture. Ten (91%) of these meningitis cases were started on antibiotics more than 24 h after birth. Eight (80%) of these 10 cases were due to GBS. None of the mothers of the 11 meningitis cases received intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). Of the 77 cases with a positive blood culture only, 73 (95%) were due to GBS. The mothers of 11 (15%) of these 73 children had received IAP. This difference in IAP between mothers of GBS meningitis and GBS sepsis patients is not statistically significant (fisher exact test p = 0.37).The authors raise important questions about the efficacy of IAP to prevent early-onset meningitis. However, the limited number of cases and observational design make our study unsuited to answer these questions. We would suggest a systematic review and meta-analysis of the, unfortunately few, randomized controlled trials to study the effect of maternal IAP to prevent neonatal meningitis as the next step.
Authors: Linde Snoek; Merel N van Kassel; Jurjen F Krommenhoek; Niek B Achten; Frans B Plötz; Nina M van Sorge; Matthijs C Brouwer; Diederik van de Beek; Merijn W Bijlsma Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2022-01-10