| Literature DB >> 35243049 |
Lohitha Gujjari1,2, Hamed Kalani3, Sai Kiran Pindiprolu4, Bhanu Prakash Arakareddy5, Ganesh Yadagiri4,6.
Abstract
Malaria is one of the prevalent tropical diseases caused by the parasitic protozoan of the genus Plasmodium spp. With an estimated 228 million cases, it is a major public health concern with high incidence of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The emergence of drug-resistant parasites, inadequate vector control measures, and the non-availability of effective vaccine(s) against malaria pose a serious challenge to malaria eradication especially in underdeveloped and developing countries. Malaria treatment and control comprehensively relies on chemical compounds, which encompass various complications, including severe toxic effects, emergence of drug resistance, and high cost of therapy. To overcome the clinical failures of anti-malarial chemotherapy, a new drug development is of an immediate need. However, the drug discovery and development process is expensive and time consuming. In such a scenario, nanotechnological strategies may offer promising alternative approach for the treatment and control of malaria, with improved efficacy and safety. Nanotechnology based formulations of existing anti-malarial chemotherapeutic agents prove to exceed the limitations of existing therapies in relation to optimum therapeutic benefits, safety, and cost effectiveness, which indeed advances the patient's compliance in treatment. In this review, the shortcomings of malaria therapeutics and necessity of nanotechnological strategies for treating malaria were discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-malarials; Chemotherapy; Drug resistance; Efficacy; Malaria; Nanotechnological approaches
Year: 2022 PMID: 35243049 PMCID: PMC8866151 DOI: 10.1016/j.parepi.2022.e00244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite Epidemiol Control ISSN: 2405-6731
Fig. 1Life cycle of malaria parasite (Reproduced, adapted and modified from Baruah et al., 2017).
Fig. 2Chemical structures of anti-malarial agents.
Advantages and disadvantages of currently available anti-malarial agents.
| Drug with mode of action | Advantages | Disadvantages | Clinical indications |
|---|---|---|---|
Accumulation of the toxic heme in the parasite by preventing the conversion of toxic heme into nontoxic hemozoin Lysosomotropic | Fast action in RBC stages High volume of distribution Oral dosage forms Very low in toxicity High bioavailability | Widespread development of resistance Macular retinopathy 1–2 months of half-life (long) | Uncomplicated malaria
|
Accumulation of cytotoxic heme within the parasite by acting on heme detoxification pathway | Fast action in RBC stages Oral route formulation High oral bioavailability Resistance is uncommon | Less potent than CQ Cause cinchonism Hypoglycemia Serious hematologic disorders Small therapeutic index Drug association is needed Neurotoxicity dose-dependent | Severe malaria CQ-resistant uncomplicated malaria Association with doxycycline, tetracycline, or clindamycin |
Inhibits P Acts as a gametocytocidal and schizontocidal | Safe and well-tolerated Potent and fast action in blood stages Gametocytocidal effects No widespread resistance | Poor water solubility Unavailable Low bioavailability by oral route Very short-elimination half-lives Expensive drug | Severe complicated malaria management |
It acts by inhibiting the formation of functional transport vesicles in the golgi apparatus Interference with ubiquinone | The only hypnozoidal and transmission blocking drug for Prophylactic action | Must not be used during pregnancy Limited oral availability Hemolytic anemia Methemoglobinemia Hemeolysis in patients with glucose6- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency | Uncomplicated malaria |
Heme metabolism Blood schizontocide | Potent action against erythrocytic stages | Causes severe neuropsychiatric reactions Expensive drug Long half life | Uncomplicated malaria
|
Inhibits mitochondrial respiration of the parasite | Used as a prophylactic for treating | Long elimination half-life (50–70 h) Poor and variable absorption | Uncomplicated malaria Chemoprophylaxis |
Advantages and limitations of various nanocarrier systems.
| Type of nano- carriers | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | Both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs can be carried, highly stable, biodegradable, non-toxic, can be administered by parenteral and cutaneous routes, enhanced therapeutic index, possibilities of surface functionalization | Highly expensive, short half-life, encapsulated drugs may leak into the systemic circulation |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | Biocompatible, affordable, avoid reticular endothelial system, flexible for ligand specific interaction, avoids leakage of the drug | Difficult to scale up |
| Solid lipid nanoparticles | Biocompatible, easy scale up and sterilize, highly stable, can be administered by oral, parenteral and cutaneous routes, avoidance of organic solvents, encapsulation of both lipophilic and hydrophobic drugs | Drug loading efficacy is low, chances of initial burst and drug explosion due to its crystalline structure, short half-life and surfactant toxicity |
| (SLNs) | ||
| Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) | Improved stability and drug loading compared to SLNs, long shelf life, easy scale up and sterilize | toxicity related to surfactant |
| Nanoemulsions | Easy to prepare, long shelf life, both lipophilic and hydrophobic drugs can be carried, used for oral, parenteral and cutaneous routes of administration, thermodynamically stable, can be sterilized by filtration | Huge amount of surfactants are used, hence causes risk of toxicity. |
| Metallic nanoparticles | Antifungal, antibacterial, highly stable and uniform in structure | Toxic adverse reactions |