| Literature DB >> 35242876 |
Linfeng Zou1,2, Bing Liang2, YuanZhen Gao1,2, Ting Ye1,2, MengJiao Li1,2, Yukun Zhang1,2, Qi Lu1,2, Xiaokun Hu1, Huanting Li1, Yang Yuan2, Dongming Xing2,3.
Abstract
Doxorubicin (Dox) is an effective chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of various cancers. Due to its potential fatal cardiotoxic side effects, the clinical application is often limited. Dexrazoxane (Dex) is the only drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of Dox-induced cardiotoxicity but has side effects. Thus, more protective strategies should be explored. If NAD+ plays a role in maintaining heart function, its precursor prospectively alleviates Dox-induced cellular injury. Here, we studied the protective effects of nicotinic acid riboside (NAR) on Dox-induced cardiotoxicity in vivo and in vitro. We found that NAR significantly improved the cardiac function of Dox-treated mice by restoring ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), and serum level of cardiac troponin (cTnI). NAR not only reduced malondialdehyde (MDA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in Dox-treated cardiomyocytes but also further promoted the activities of cardiac superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione (GSH). Following exposure to 5 μM Dox, cotreatment with NAR exhibited increased cell viability with a decrease in the apoptosis cell population. Moreover, the levels of apoptosis-related proteins, as well as proteins involved in oxidative stress and autophagy, were altered after NAR treatment. Collectively, these findings underline the protective potential of NAR against Dox-induced cardiomyocyte injury by regulating Nrf-2/P62-related oxidative stress and autophagy, which could potentially promote survival.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242876 PMCID: PMC8888081 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6293329
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1(a) The molecular structure of NAR. (b) Model of NAD+ biosynthesis pathways [14].The effect of NAR and Dox administration alone or in combination on cell viability. (c) The cytotoxic effect of different concentrations NAR and Dox alone or in combination on H9c2 cardiomyocytes. (d) The effect of NAR combined with Dox on the cell viability of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. (e) Levels of LDH release. (f) Microstructures of the H9c2 cells under different treatments. Scale bar = 300 μm. (g) Microstructures of the MCF-7 cells under different treatments. Scale bar = 300 μm. The results were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Student t-tests. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as P < 0.05. Versus the control, #P < 0.05; versus the Dox group, ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 2NAR has alleviated Dox-induced cardiac insufficiency. (a) Echocardiogram representative image (n = 6), (b) restoring ejection fraction (EF), (c) fractional shortening (FS), (d) cardiac troponin levels(cTnI), and (e) the results from hematoxylin and eosin staining and IL-1β immunohistochemistry of myocardial tissue (indicated by brown dots). Data were represented as mean ± SEM. #P < 0.05 compared to control; ∗P < 0.05 compared to Dox.
Figure 3The effect of NAR and Dox administration alone or in combination on the activities of antioxidant enzymes and cell apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. (a) The SOD of NAR and Dox alone or in combination on H9c2 cardiomyocytes. (b) The GSH of NAR and Dox alone or in combination on H9c2 cardiomyocytes. (c) NAD+/NADH ratio. (d) NOX contents. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Student t-tests. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as P < 0.05. versus the control, #P < 0.05; versus the Dox group, ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 4NAR and Dox administration alone or in combination on the cell apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. (a) Flow cytometric dot plots (x-axis: Annexin V-FITC staining, y-axis: PI staining). (b) The H9c2 cells were analyzed for apoptosis using the TUNEL staining method. The panels display representative histological images (magnification×40). Scale bar = 100 μm. (c) Quantitative analysis of the fluorescence intensity. (d) Expression of cardiac apoptosis proteins in different treatment groups. Densitometric analysis of (e) caspase-3; (f) Bcl-2; and (g) Bax. The figure shows a representative blot for that protein. The values were expressed as fold changes over the level of β-tubulin, which served as a loading control. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Student t-tests. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Significance is indicated as P < 0.05. Versus the control, #P < 0.05; versus the Dox group, ∗P < 0.05.
Figure 5NAR antagonizes doxorubicin-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis and oxidative stress by protecting mitochondria. (a) The ROS of NAR and Dox alone or in combination on H9c2 cardiomyocytes. (b) MDA level. (c) The images of the effect of doxorubicin, dexrazoxane, and NAR treatment on mitochondrial membrane potential in H9c2 cells (magnification×40). Scale bar = 100 μm. (d) Quantitative analysis of the fluorescence ratio of green fluorescence to red fluorescence is shown. (e) Cellular ATP concentration in H9c2 cells. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. #P < 0.05 compared to control; ∗P < 0.05 compared to Dox.
Figure 6The effect of Dox and NAR on the expression level of oxidative stress proteins and cardiac autophagic proteins after 24 h treatment. (a) Expression of cardiac autophagic proteins in different treatment groups. Densitometric analysis of (b) P62; (c) Beclin 1 and (d) LC3B. (e) Expression of cardiac oxidative stress proteins in different treatment groups. Densitometric analysis of: (f) ROCK-1; (g) Nrf-2; (h) Keap-1; (i) RhoA. The figure shows a representative blot for that protein. The values were expressed as fold changes over the level of GADPH, which served as a loading control. Data were represented as mean ± SEM. #P < 0.05 compared to control; ∗P < 0.05 compared to Dox. (j) The localization of Nrf-2 was examined by confocal microscopy (magnification×40). Scale bar = 100 μm.