| Literature DB >> 35242793 |
Qinyu Li1, Chunjie Zhang1,2, Tuya Xilin3, Mingyue Ji1, Xiangxi Meng1, Yulian Zhao1, Bateer Siqin3, Na Zhang1, Minhui Li1,4,5,6.
Abstract
Koumiss is a traditional fermented dairy product with health and medicinal benefits. It is very popular in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. The results of relevant studies have shown that koumiss can regulate the gastrointestinal environment, improve the absorption of nutrients, improve the body's intolerance to lactose, enhance the body's immunity, prevent scurvy and atherosclerosis, and aid in the treatment of tuberculosis. However, there are no systematic reports on the effects of koumiss on immunity. In this study, we aimed to decipher the effects of koumiss on intestinal immune modulation. We used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis to determine the composition of Koumiss. Using Compound Discoverer software, we compared the mass spectrometry data with the compound information in the online databases ChemSpider and mzCloud to intelligently identify the main chemical components of koumiss. Additionally, we used Mass Frontier small molecule fragmentation libraryTM to determine the structure of fragment ions. A total of 21 components were identified, which clarified the chemical basis of koumiss. These 21 compounds were then used to perform molecular docking with immune-related targets, such as TNF, IL2, IL10, etc. The results indicated good docking activity between most of the compounds and the targets. Then, an immunosuppressive rat model was used to determine the therapeutic effect of koumiss. The results of this study showed that koumiss could, to a certain extent, correct the atrophy of the thymus and spleen in immunosuppressed model rats. The number of leukocytes, lymphocytes, and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio of peripheral blood lymphocytes was also increased. In addition, it could effectively improve the structure of the small intestinal mucosa, which shows that koumiss has a positive effect on the intestinal immune function of immunosuppressed rats. These findings provide an experimental basis for the development and utilization of koumiss as a therapeutic product.Entities:
Keywords: LC-MS/MS; cyclophosphamide; flow cytometry; intestinal immune; koumiss
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242793 PMCID: PMC8886295 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.765499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Traditional koumiss production process in the Xilinguole league of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.
Ion source, full MS, and dd-MS2 parameter of the Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS/MS.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Sheath gas pressure | 35 psi |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate | 10 L/min |
| Spare gas flow rate | 1 L/min |
| Spray voltage | +3,500 V |
| Capillary temperature | 320°C |
| Probe heater temperature | 350°C |
| S-Lens RF level | 50 V |
| Full MS | |
| Resolution | 70,000 |
| Mass range | 150–1,500 |
| AGC target | 3e6 |
| Maximum IT | 100 ms |
| dd-MS2 | |
| Resolution | 17,500 |
| AGC target | 1e5 |
| Maximum IT | 50 ms |
| Loop count | 5 |
| Mass isolation window | 4.0 |
| Normalized collision energy | 30% |
| Minimum AGC | 8e3 |
| Intensity thresh | 1.5e5 |
| Exclude isotope | On |
| Dynamic exclusion | 10 s |
List of the six groups of rats.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Normal | Physiological saline | Intraperitoneal injection | Distilled water | Oral |
| Model | Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg bw) | Intraperitoneal injection | Distilled water | Oral |
| Positive | Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg bw) | Intraperitoneal injection | Zhenqi fuzheng capsules (250 mg/kg bw) | Oral |
| CY+H | Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg bw) | Intraperitoneal injection | Koumiss (31.25 ml/kg bw) | Oral |
| CY+M | Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg bw) | Intraperitoneal injection | Koumiss (20.83 ml/kg bw) | Oral |
| CY+L | Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg bw) | Intraperitoneal injection | Koumiss (10.42 ml/kg bw) | Oral |
Figure 2Total ion chromatograms of koumiss in the positive ionization mode (A) and negative ion mode (B).
Retention time, molecular formula, formula, and DeltaMass of the 66 identified compounds.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benzothiazole | 0.435 | C7 H5 N S | −0.91 | 135.01415 |
| 2 | DL-Arginine | 0.984 | C6 H14 N4 O2 | −0.67 | 174.11156 |
| 3 | Choline | 0.997 | C5 H13 N O | 3.15 | 103.10004 |
| 4 | DL-Glutamine | 1.011 | C5 H10 N2 O3 | −0.11 | 146.06913 |
| 5 | Creatine | 1.035 | C4 H9 N3 O2 | 0.25 | 131.06951 |
| 6 | D-(+)-Proline | 1.049 | C5 H9 N O2 | 1.57 | 115.06351 |
| 7 | Threonine | 1.06 | C4H9NO3 | 0.32045 | 119.05824 |
| 8 | Acetylcholine | 1.07 | C7 H15 N O2 | −0.64 | 145.11019 |
| 9 | L(-)-Carnitine | 1.121 | C7 H15 N O3 | −0.84 | 161.10506 |
| 10 | Adenine | 1.126 | C5 H5 N5 | −0.37 | 135.05445 |
| 11 | Acetyl-L-carnitine | 1.133 | C9 H17 N O4 | −0.47 | 203.11566 |
| 12 | Valylproline | 1.138 | C10 H18 N2 O3 | −0.5 | 214.13163 |
| 13 | L-Norleucine | 1.14 | C6 H13 N O2 | 0.18 | 131.09465 |
| 14 | Leucine | 1.14 | C6H13NO2 | 0.17782 | 131.09462 |
| 15 | Tyrosine | 1.18 | C9H11NO3 | −0.38058 | 181.07389 |
| 16 | Tyramine | 1.564 | C8 H11 N O | 0.66 | 137.08415 |
| 17 | L-Isoleucine | 1.64 | C6 H13 N O2 | 0.17 | 131.09465 |
| 18 | Propionylcarnitine | 2.033 | C10 H19 N O4 | −0.76 | 217.13124 |
| 19 | 6-Aminocaproic acid | 2.275 | C6 H13 N O2 | −0.05 | 131.09462 |
| 20 | Hypoxanthine | 2.396 | C5 H4 N4 O | −0.19 | 136.03848 |
| 21 | Alanyltyrosine | 2.407 | C12 H16 N2 O4 | −1.14 | 252.11072 |
| 22 | L-Phenylalanine | 2.690 | C9 H11 N O2 | −0.35 | 165.07892 |
| 23 | Leucylproline | 3.991 | C11 H20 N2 O3 | −0.29 | 228.14733 |
| 24 | D-(+)-Tryptophan | 4.522 | C11 H12 N2 O2 | −0.64 | 204.08975 |
| 25 | 4-Acetamidobenzoic acid | 5.902 | C9 H9 N O3 | −3.82 | 179.05756 |
| 26 | Phenylacetylglycine | 7.532 | C10 H11 N O3 | −2.07 | 193.07349 |
| 27 | Valine | 11.852 | C5 H11 N O2 | 1.72 | 117.07918 |
| 28 | Tert-Butyl N-[1-(aminocarbonyl)-3-methylbutyl]carbamate | 11.852 | C11 H22 N2 O3 | −1.39 | 230.16272 |
| 29 | Hexanoylcarnitine | 13.063 | C13 H25 N O4 | −0.81 | 259.17815 |
| 30 | L-(-)-Methionine | 15.02 | C5 H11 N O2 S | −0.76 | 149.05094 |
| 31 | Prolylleucine | 25.968 | C11 H20 N2 O3 | −1.44 | 228.14706 |
| 32 | 2,4-Dimethylbenzaldehyde | 28.09 | C9 H10 O | −0.66 | 134.07308 |
| 33 | N-Butylbenzenesulfonamide | 30.42 | C10 H15 N O2 S | −1.41 | 213.08205 |
| 34 | (+/–)12( | 42.338 | C18 H34 O4 | −0.29 | 314.24562 |
| 35 | Bis(4-ethylbenzylidene)sorbitol | 42.948 | C24 H30 O6 | −1.66 | 414.20355 |
| 36 | Progesterone | 46.428 | C21 H30 O2 | −1.7 | 314.22405 |
| 37 | Octadecanamine | 48.755 | C18 H39 N | −1.31 | 269.3079 |
| 38 | α-Linolenic acid | 50.26 | C18 H30 O2 | −1.16 | 278.22426 |
| 39 | Citral | 50.578 | C10 H16 O | −1.2 | 152.11993 |
| 40 | 16-Hydroxyhexadecanoic acid | 50.59 | C16 H32 O3 | −0.65 | 272.23497 |
| 41 | Monolaurin | 51.149 | C15 H30 O4 | −1.21 | 274.21408 |
| 42 | D-Sphingosine | 51.342 | C18 H37 N O2 | −1.33 | 299.28203 |
| 43 | 11(Z),14(Z),17(Z)-Eicosatrienoic acid | 51.347 | C20 H34 O2 | −1.71 | 306.25536 |
| 44 | 13(S)-HOTrE | 52.77 | C18 H30 O3 | −1.42 | 294.21908 |
| 45 | 4-Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid | 52.773 | C18 H30 O3 S | −0.54 | 326.19139 |
| 46 | Myristyl sulfate | 52.965 | C14 H30 O4 S | −0.16 | 294.18643 |
| 47 | Linoleic acid | 53.63 | C18H32O2 | −1.87746 | 280.24023 |
| 48 | Pinolenic acid | 53.707 | C18 H30 O2 | −1.22 | 278.22424 |
| 49 | Dibutyl phthalate | 53.894 | C16 H22 O4 | −2.07 | 278.15123 |
| 50 | 1,2-Dihydroxyheptadec-16-yn-4-yl acetate | 54.509 | C19 H34 O4 | −1.95 | 326.24507 |
| 51 | Lauric acid | 54.649 | C12 H24 O2 | −4.21 | 200.17679 52 |
| 52 | 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl 12-methyltridecanoate | 55.549 | C17 H34 O4 | −2.37 | 302.24499 |
| 53 | Palmitoleic acid | 56.305 | C16 H30 O2 | −1.38 | 254.22423 |
| 54 | Arachidonic acid | 56.383 | C20 H32 O2 | −1.43 | 304.23979 |
| 55 | Cis-12-Octadecenoic acid methyl ester | 56.869 | C19 H36 O2 | −1.53 | 296.27108 |
| 56 | Palmitoyl ethanolamide | 57.026 | C18 H37 N O2 | −1.74 | 299.28191 |
| 57 | Linolenic acid ethyl ester | 57.042 | C20 H34 O2 | −1.91 | 306.2553 |
| 58 | 1-Linoleoyl glycerol | 57.061 | C21 H38 O4 | −2.06 | 354.27628 |
| 59 | 2-Arachidonoyl glycerol | 57.173 | C23 H38 O4 | −1.98 | 378.27626 |
| 60 | α-Eleostearic acid | 57.37 | C18 H30 O2 | −1.22 | 278.22424 |
| 61 | Trans, trans-2,4-Heptadienal | 58.096 | C7 H10 O | 0.93 | 110.07327 |
| 62 | Hexadecanamide | 58.346 | C16 H33 N O | −1.75 | 255.25577 |
| 63 | Docosapentaenoic acid | 58.637 | C22 H34 O2 | −1.31 | 330.25545 |
| 64 | Stearoyl ethanolamide | 59.379 | C20 H41 N O2 | −1.84 | 327.31313 |
| 65 | Palmitic acid | 59.687 | C16 H32 O2 | −1.24 | 256.23991 |
| 66 | Ethyl palmitoleate | 59.957 | C18 H34 O2 | −1.57 | 282.25544 |
Application of Mass Frontier Fragmentation Library.
Figure 3Chemical structure of the components tentatively identified in koumiss.
Figure 4Molecular docking results of compounds in koumiss with immune-related targets. Binding energy thermogram of compounds identified in koumiss docked with immune-related target molecules (A). Model diagram of compound-target molecule docking (B).
Spleen and thymus index of rats in each group (n = 8, x ± s).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 2.6019 ± 0.2105 | 1.8201 ± 0.1529 |
| Model | 1.9227 ± 0.2732 | 1.1321 ± 0.2759 |
| Positive | 2.3047 ± 0.4009 | 1.5111 ± 0.2822 |
| CY+L | 2.1979 ± 0.1778 | 1.5334 ± 0.1603 |
| CY+M | 2.4611 ± 0.3816 | 1.3718 ± 0.2215 |
| CY+H | 2.3134 ± 0.4624 | 1.4160 ± 0.2299 |
P < 0.01 vs. control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. model group.
Figure 5Effect of koumiss on intestinal Peyer's patches. The figure shows the P-values for the overall differences between groups obtained using the Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test, and the markers for the significance levels of the differences obtained using the Dunn's test between groups (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
Comparison of blood index levels between the groups of rats (n = 8, x̄ ± s).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.09 ± 1.30 | 9.22 ± 0.31 | 902.50 ± 47.91 | 4.11 ± 0.76 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.12 ± 0.03 |
| Model | 3.97 ± 0.67 | 8.12.09 ± 0.45 | 1246.5 ± 184.49 | 2.00 ± 1.03 | 1.64 ± 1.00 | 0.82 ± 1.09 |
| Positive | 8.22 ± 2.69 | 7.91 ± 0.22 | 1325.63 ± 196.38 | 3.41 ± 2.39 | 3.40 ± 1.80 | 1.32 ± 1.24 |
| CY+L | 6.96 ± 1.49 | 7.64 ± 0.36 | 1425.13 ± 77.02 | 2.17 ± 1.52 | 3.53 ± 1.62 | 1.43 ± 0.83 |
| CY+M | 7.85 ± 3.09 | 7.71 ± 0.34 | 1509.50 ± 134.39 | 1.44 ± 1.20 | 4.01 ± 2.11 | 1.87 ± 1.05 |
| CY+H | 9.97 ± 3.16 | 7.56 ± 0.21 | 1669.88 ± 106.42 | 2.00 ± 0.92 | 5.28 ± 2.72 | 1.91 ± 1.28 |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. model group.
The length of the villi in the jejunum and duodenum of each group (n = 3, x̄ ± s).
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Normal | 355.01 ± 60.08 | 112.98 ± 8.75 | 3.16 ± 0.63 | 369.95 ± 28.15 | 122.43 ± 11.07 | 3.03 ± 0.14 | 316.53 ± 37.57 | 127.83 ± 15.86 | 2.48 ± 0.1 |
| Model | 326.61 ± 92.79 | 162.81 ± 86.25 | 2.18 ± 0.5 | 183.14 ± 29.63 | 116.44 ± 12.31 | 1.57 ± 0.09 | 404.03 ± 91.29 | 198.56 ± 24.09 | 2.02 ± 0.23 |
| Positive | 337.1 ± 98.16 | 158.92 ± 68.71 | 2.26 ± 0.48 | 236.89 ± 16.32 | 97.14 ± 12.18 | 2.46 ± 0.35 | 385.22 ± 100.1 | 149.42 ± 20.45 | 2.56 ± 0.49 |
| CY+L | 366.92 ± 37.84 | 102.88 ± 19.24 | 3.66 ± 0.84 | 225.8 ± 10.46 | 92.63 ± 6.36 | 2.45 ± 0.22 | 381.53 ± 72.97 | 120.36 ± 28.67 | 3.22 ± 0.59 |
| CY+M | 334.67 ± 145.06 | 113.53 ± 36.66 | 2.92 ± 0.51 | 239.96 ± 24.59 | 92.28 ± 18.63 | 2.68 ± 0.68 | 391.1 ± 138.21 | 147.91 ± 56.16 | 2.67 ± 0.1 |
| CY+H | 367.9 ± 14.67 | 115.24 ± 18.21 | 3.24 ± 0.44 | 289.08 ± 33.57 | 99.41 ± 22.44 | 2.95 ± 0.3 | 410.37 ± 39.64 | 144.32 ± 52.08 | 3.01 ± 0.68 |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. model group.
Figure 6Effects of koumiss on the histomorphology of the ileum, jejunum, and duodenum in rats.
Figure 7Proportions of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ cells in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of rats in each group. (A) Normal group, (B) Model group, (C) Positive group, (D) CY+L group, (E) CY+M group, (F) CY+H group.
Changes in blood T lymphocyte subsets of rats in each group (%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 36.3750 ± 5.9455 | 0.0122 ± 0.0010 | 0.0154 ± 0.0005 | 0.7925 ± 0.0713 |
| Model | 27.1625 ± 7.3856 | 0.0098 ± 0.0015 | 0.0167 ± 0.0007 | 0.5848 ± 0.0958 |
| Positive | 30.1875 ± 7.8103 | 0.0113 ± 0.0006 | 0.0168 ± 0.0005 | 0.6736 ± 0.0396 |
| CY+L | 37.9250 ± 4.6810 | 0.0118 ± 0.0009 | 0.0181 ± 0.0007 | 0.6508 ± 0.0714 |
| CY+M | 29.2250 ± 6.1467 | 0.0123 ± 0.0011 | 0.0179 ± 0.0005 | 0.6878 ± 0.0669 |
| CY+H | 33.1875 ± 7.6809 | 0.0118 ± 0.0008 | 0.0184 ± 0.0005 | 0.6405 ± 0.0493 |
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. control group;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01 vs. model group.