| Literature DB >> 35242766 |
Pallavi Thaker1, Roshan B Colah1, Jignisha Patel2, Bhavesh Raicha2, Abhishek Mistry2, Vishal Mehta2, Yazdi Italia2, Shrey Desai3, Kapilkumar Dave3, Rajasubramaniam Shanmugam4, Kanjaksha Ghosh1, Malay B Mukherjee1.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) poses considerable public health problems in India. This study was undertaken to understand the clinical course of SCD among children identified during newborn screening programmes in Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh where the frequency of the HbS gene is high. A total of 8,916 newborn babies 8,411 from Gujarat and 505 from Madhya Pradesh were screened over 6 years (2010-2016) using HPLC and the diagnosis was confirmed by molecular analysis in a subset. A total of 128 babies (122 Gujarat, 6 Madhya Pradesh) were identified with sickle cell disease, of whom 87 (69 HbSS, 18 HbS-β thalassemia) from Gujarat were followed for 0.5-6.6 years. Acute painful events, severe anemia and fever with infections were the major complications and 23 babies required hospitalization. Severe to moderate clinical presentation was found in 13.8% babies with SCD whereas, 86.2% babies had a milder presentation. Presence of ameliorating factors (α-thalassemia and Xmn 1 polymorphism) did not have a discernible effect on the clinical severity. Parents of babies with SCD were educated and counseled for home care. Distribution of mobile phones to 44 families having babies with SCD was beneficial as it allowed regular contact with patients and their families. Genetic counseling to the affected families has increased the awareness and acceptance for prenatal diagnosis and 18 couples opted for prenatal diagnosis in subsequent pregnancies. SCD is not always mild among tribal groups in India. Therefore, facilities for early diagnosis and prophylactic treatment in the tertiary care centers should be made available. The difficulties in regular follow up of the babies in remote rural areas have also been highlighted.Entities:
Keywords: Gujarat; India; Madhya Pradesh; comprehensive care; newborn screening; sickle cell anemia; tribal population
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242766 PMCID: PMC8885810 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.731884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Figure 1Flow chart of methodology.
Scoring system for clinical evaluation of children with sickle cell disease.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Hospitalizations/year | 0 | 1 | 2 | >3 | – |
| Blood transfusions/year | 0 | 1 | 2 | >3 | – |
| Painful events/year | 0 | 1 | 2 | >3 | – |
| Dactylitis events/year | 0 | 1 | 2 | >3 | – |
| Vaso-occlusive crises | No | – | – | Yes | – |
| Sequestration crises | No | – | – | Yes | – |
| Acute chest syndrome (ACS) | No | – | – | Yes | – |
| Sepsis | No | – | – | – | Yes |
| Stroke | No | – | – | – | Yes |
Classification of the patient.
Total score for milder patient: 0-3.
Total score for moderate patient: 4-7.
Total score for severe patient: 8-15.
Hematological findings during follow-up of babies with HbSS and HbS-β-thalassemia having mild and moderate to severe clinical presentation.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| RBCs (x1012/l) | 4.76 ± 0.6 | 3.89 ± 0.9 | 4.67 ± 0.4 | 4.50–4.58 |
| Hb (g/dl) | 8.8 ± 1.0 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 8.7 ± 0.7 | 8.80–9.60 |
| MCV (fL) | 62.6 ± 8.2 | 72.7 ± 4.0 | 62.6 ± 5.9 | 67.0–69.6 |
| MCH (pg) | 18.7 ± 2.3 | 20.4 ± 0.2 | 18.8 ± 2.0 | 20.6–20.0 |
| MCHC (g/dl) | 29.8 ± 1.7 | 28.1 ± 1.2 | 30.1 ± 1.4 | 30.0–29.4 |
| RDW (%) | 21.6 ± 5.2 | 19.4 ± 4.4 | 21.4 ± 6.3 | 19.0–19.4 |
| HbF (%) | 23.5 ± 8.4 | 8.6 ± 0.3 | 27.5 ± 9.3 | 18.4–20.7 |
Statistically Significant (p < 0.05).
Clinical presentation of the babies with sickle cell disease during the follow up period (0.5–6.6 years).
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Painful crises | 12 (17.4%) | 1–3 | 7 (38.9%) | 1–2 |
| Severe anemia (Hb <6.0 g/dl) | 15 (21.8%) | 1–2 | 3 (16.6%) | 1–2 |
| Blood transfusion | 9 (13.1%) | 1–5 | 2 (11.1%) | 1–2 |
| Fever with infection | 19 (27.5%) | 1–3 | 7 (38.9%) | 1–4 |
| Sepsis | 5 (7.2%) | 1 | 1 (5.5%) | 1 |
| Hospitalization for infection or severe painful crises | 15 (21.8%) | 3–6 | 8 (44.4%) | 1–14 |
| Dactylitis | 2 (2.9%) | 1 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 |
| ACS | 2 (2.9%) | 1 | 1 (5.5%) | 1 |
| Death | 3 (4.3%) | – | 0 | – |
Figure 2Follow Up of babies with SCD having a moderate to severe clinical presentation.
Number of phone calls received from the parents of the affected babies for different complaints.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Generalized weakness and loss of appetite | 3 |
| Fever and pain | 6 |
| Anemia and blood transfusion | 8 |
| Cold and cough | 5 |
| Inquiry about prenatal diagnosis | 2 |
| Follow up date inquiry | 9 |
| Total | 33 |
α-genotype among the affected babies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | 2 (2.7%) | 8 (10.9%) | 0 | 61 (85.6%) | 2 (2.7%) | 73 |
| Moderate to severe | 1 (10.0%) | 1 (10.0%) | 1 (10.0%) | 7 (70.0%) | 0 | 10 |
| Total | 3 (3.6%) | 9 (10.8%) | 1 (1.2%) | 68 (81.9%) | 2 (2.4%) | 83 |