| Literature DB >> 35242720 |
Bárbara B Esteves1, Marcella N Melo-Braga2, Vladimir Gorshkov3, Thiago Verano-Braga4, Martin R Larsen3, Célia M F Gontijo5, Patricia F Quaresma6, Helida M Andrade1.
Abstract
Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis is the main etiological agent of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in Latin America. Non-ulcerated atypical tegumentary leishmaniasis cases caused by L. braziliensis have been reported in several regions of the American continent, including the Xacriabá indigenous reserve in São João das Missões/Minas Gerais, Brazil. Parasites isolated from these atypical clinical lesions are resistant to antimony-based therapeutics. In the present study, proteins displaying differential abundance in two strains of L. braziliensis isolated from patients with atypical lesions compared with four strains isolated from patients with typical lesions were identified using a quantitative proteomics approach based on tandem mass tag labeling (TMT) and mass spectrometry. A total of 532 (P<0.05) differentially abundant proteins were identified (298 upregulated and 234 downregulated) in strains from atypical lesions compared to strains from typical lesions. Prominent positively regulated proteins in atypical strains included those that may confer greater survival inside macrophages, proteins related to antimony resistance, and proteins associated with higher peroxidase activity. Additionally, we identified proteins showing potential as new drug and vaccine targets. Our findings contribute to the characterization of these intriguing L. braziliensis strains and provide a novel perspective on Atypical Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (ACL) cases that have been associated with therapeutic failures.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmania braziliensis; TMT; abundance; antimony resistance; atypical wounds; proteome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242720 PMCID: PMC8886221 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.824968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Identification of differentially abundant proteins in three experimental replicates. (A) Venn diagram showing the 4,048 proteins identified in the 3 independent runs. (B) Volcano plot of proteins with statistically significant changes in abundance after ANOVA (P<0.05) (y axis) and fold change in log2 of 0.584 (1.5) (x axis). (C) Upregulated proteins in each run. (D) Downregulated proteins in each run.
Figure 2Gene ontology enrichment analysis (GO). Protein distribution based on molecular functions (A) and biological processes (B) predicted in L. braziliensis from the atypical lesions group in relation to the typical lesions group. In red, categories enriched in the upregulated proteins group; in green, categories enriched in the downregulated proteins group. Terms overrepresented by P< 0.05 in Fisher’s exact test, filtering for FDR < 0.05.
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of Molecular Function in differentially regulated proteins in L. braziliensis from atypical lesion (LbAL) compared to L. braziliensis from typical lesion (LbTL).
| TERM | Fold change (P value) | PROTEINS | RATIO (LbAL vs LbTL) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 7.43 | trypanothione reductase | 2.417 |
| peptide_methionine sulfoxide reductase-like | 1.060 | ||
| putative thioredoxin | 0.984 | ||
| thiol-dependent_reductase_1 | 0.709 | ||
| putative glutaredoxin-like protein | 0.649 | ||
|
| 18.26 | ecotin | 1.917 |
| Ecotin-like protein 2 | 0.797 | ||
| Protein phosphatase inhibitor 2 (IPP-2) | 0.768 | ||
|
| |||
|
| 7.02 | mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase | -1.150 |
| choline dehydrogenase like protein, | -1.062 | ||
| glycosomal malate dehydrogenase | -0.944 | ||
| dehydrogenase-like protein | -0.888 | ||
| putative short chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase | -0.825 | ||
|
| 9.70 | putative target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase 1 | -1.744 |
| putative protein kinase | -1.029 | ||
| protein kinase A catalytic subunit isoform 1 | -0.765 | ||
| protein kinase A catalytic subunit | -0.676 | ||
|
| 2.73 | mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase | -1.150 |
| choline dehydrogenase, like protein | -1.062 | ||
| putative short chain dehydrogenase | -1.017 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein (134065654) | -0.978 | ||
| glycosomal malate dehydrogenase | -0.944 | ||
| putative endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin | -0.938 | ||
| dehydrogenase-like protein | -0.888 | ||
| putative short chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase | -0.825 | ||
| fatty acid desaturase | -0.700 | ||
| aldehyde dehydrogenase, mitochondrial precursor | -0.696 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein | -0.662 | ||
| putative C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase, cytoplasmic | -0.655 | ||
|
| 35.57 | putative endoplasmic reticulum oxidoreductin | -0.938 |
| conserved hypothetical protein (134063632) | -0.662 |
Proteins sorted by log2-ratio.
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of Biological Process in differentially regulated proteins in L. braziliensis from atypical lesion (LbAL) compared to L. braziliensis. Proteins sorted by log2-ratio.
| TERM | Fold change (P value) | PROTEINS | RATIO (LbAL vs LbTL) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| 2.22 | putative 60S ribosomal protein L10a | 1.807 |
| 40S ribosomal protein S24e | 1.398 | ||
| 60S ribosomal protein L32 | 1.357 | ||
| putative DNA-directed RNA polymerase II | 1.342 | ||
| FtsJ-like_methyltransferase | 1.287 | ||
| DNA_primase_large_subunit | 1.237 | ||
| Chain B, Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase | 1.224 | ||
| nucleoside diphosphate kinase b | 1.072 | ||
| putative 60S acidic ribosomal protein | 1.048 | ||
| putative 40S ribosomal protein S30 | 1.041 | ||
| deoxyribose-phosphate_aldolase | 0.969 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein | 0.954 | ||
| kynureninase | 0.952 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein | 0.891 | ||
| 60S_acidic_ribosomal_protein_P2 | 0.816 | ||
| inosine-guanosine_transporter | 0.770 | ||
| acidic ribosomal P2 beta protein | 0.769 | ||
| putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase | 0.717 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L13a | 0.712 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L19 | 0.708 | ||
| putative arginyl-tRNA synthetase | 0.669 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein S7 | 0.624 | ||
| putative asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase | 0.623 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein l35a | 0.616 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein L27 | 0.609 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein L15 | 0.601 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L5 | 0.601 | ||
|
| 2.47 | putative 60s ribosomal protein l10a | 1.807 |
|
| 2.38 | 40S ribosomal protein S24e | 1.398 |
| 60S ribosomal protein L32 | 1.357 | ||
| FtsJ-like_methyltransferase | 1.287 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein | 1.119 | ||
| putative 60S acidic ribosomal protein | 1.048 | ||
| putative 40S ribosomal protein S30 | 1.041 | ||
| conserved hypothetical protein | 0.891 | ||
| 60S_acidic_ribosomal_protein_P2 | 0.816 | ||
| acidic ribosomal P2 beta protein | 0.769 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L13a | 0.712 | ||
| thiol-dependent_reductase_1 | 0.709 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L19 | 0.708 | ||
| putative arginyl-tRNA synthetase | 0.669 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein S7 | 0.624 | ||
| putative asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase | 0.623 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein l35a | 0.616 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein L27 | 0.609 | ||
| putative ribosomal protein L15 | 0.601 | ||
| putative 60S ribosomal protein L5 | 0.601 |
Figure 3Prediction of interaction among differentially abundant proteins in L. braziliensis that are part of enriched GO categories. Red and green represents upregulated and downregulated proteins in LbAL vs LbTL comparison.
Figure 4Analysis of enrichment of metabolic pathways by KEGG. Distribution of proteins based on metabolic pathways in L. braziliensis from the atypical lesions group (LbAL) compared to the typical lesions group (LbTL). In red, metabolic pathways enriched in the upregulated protein group; in green, metabolic pathways enriched in the downregulated protein group. Terms overrepresented by P < 0.01 in Fisher’s exact test.
KEGG enriched pathways of differentially regulated proteins in L. braziliensis from atypical lesion (LbAL) compared to L. braziliensis from typical lesion (LbTL).
| PATHWAY | PROTEINS | RATIO(LbAL |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism | putative thymine-7-hydroxylase | 1.456151 |
|
| 1.287025 | |
|
| 0.814614 | |
| putative methylthioadenosine phosphorylase | 0.717098 | |
|
| 0.686384 | |
|
| 0.679376 | |
| putative branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase | 0.639421 | |
|
| 0.627521 | |
|
| 0.616916 | |
| putative malate dehydrogenase | 0.585591 | |
| Glutathione metabolism | trypanothione reductase | 2.417349 |
| hypothetical protein, unknown function (322504762) | 1.724753 | |
| tryparedoxin_peroxidase | 0.993897 | |
| thiol-dependent_reductase_1 | 0.708709 | |
| putative trypanothione synthetase | 0.689969 | |
| putative glutaredoxin-like protein | 0.649122 | |
| Phenylalanine metabolism |
| 1.287025 |
|
| 0.814614 | |
|
| 0.686384 | |
|
| 0.679376 | |
|
| 0.627521 | |
| conserved hypothetical protein (134063845) | 0.598311 | |
| Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis |
| 1.28703 |
|
| 0.81461 | |
|
| 0.68638 | |
|
| 0.62752 | |
|
| 0.61692 | |
|
| 0.61456 | |
| Tyrosine metabolism |
| 1.28703 |
|
| 0.81461 | |
| Acyltransferase | 0.81126 | |
| putative NADP-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase | 0.69938 | |
|
| 0.68638 | |
|
| 0.67938 | |
|
| 0.62752 | |
|
| 0.61692 | |
|
| 0.61456 | |
|
| ||
| Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes |
| -1.1499 |
|
| -0.94403 | |
|
| -0.82537 | |
| formate—tetrahydrofolate ligase | -0.81918 | |
|
| -0.68285 | |
| putative C-1-tetrahydrofolate synthase,cytoplasmic | -0.65468 | |
|
| -0.62284 | |
|
| -0.60924 | |
| Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation |
| -0.82537 |
|
| -0.69571 | |
|
| -0.68285 | |
|
| -0.62284 | |
|
| -0.60924 | |
| Benzoate degradation |
| -0.82537 |
|
| -0.69571 | |
|
| -0.68285 | |
|
| -0.62284 | |
|
| -0.60924 | |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism |
| -1.1499 |
|
| -0.94403 | |
|
| -0.68285 | |
|
| -0.62284 | |
|
| -0.60924 | |
| Geraniol degradation |
| -0.82537 |
|
| -0.69571 | |
|
| -0.62284 | |
| One carbon pool by folate |
| -0.82537 |
|
| -0.69571 | |
|
| -0.62284 |
In bold proteins that are in more than one pathway, proteins sorted by log2-ratio.
Figure 5Prediction of interaction among differentially abundant proteins in L. braziliensis that are part of enriched pathways. Red and green represents upregulated and downregulated proteins in LbAL vs LbTL comparison.
Figure 6Peroxidase activity. Degradation of hydrogen peroxide by cell lysates of promastigote forms of different strains of Leishmania braziliensis. In blue, LbTL group; in pink, LbAL group. These experiments were performed twice in triplicate. Measurements from the atypical group exceeded the test capacity (50µM) and, thus, no standard deviation can be calculated.