Literature DB >> 3524234

Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.

C V Smith, J P Phelan, L D Platt, P Broussard, R H Paul.   

Abstract

Antepartum fetal heart rate testing, specifically the nonstress test, is of accepted value in the antenatal surveillance of high-risk pregnancies. Fetal rest-activity cycles coupled with arbitrary test intervals appear to lead to falsely nonreactive tests. Methods to alter fetal behavioral states have not been uniformly successful. A retrospective analysis of the adjunctive use of acoustic stimulation at our institution demonstrated a 50% reduction in the number of nonreactive tests. Consequently a prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken to compare the standard nonstress test with the fetal acoustic stimulation test. Those patients randomized to the fetal acoustic stimulation test underwent transabdominal acoustic stimulation with a Model 5C electronic artificial larynx. The incidence of nonreactive tests was 14% in the control group and 9% in the study group (chi 2 = 11.09, p = 0.004). A significant reduction in testing time was also observed. The fetal acoustic stimulation test offers advantages over the traditional nonstress test by lowering the incidence of nonreactive tests and reducing testing time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3524234     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90095-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Fetal surveillance--update.

Authors:  M L Druzin
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun

Review 2.  Management of reported decreased fetal movements for improving pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Natalia Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-04-18

3.  Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation in computerized cardiotocographic analysis: the role of short-term variability and approximate entropy.

Authors:  Maria Laura Annunziata; Mariamaddalena Scala; Natascia Giuliano; Salvatore Tagliaferri; Olga Carmela Maria Imperato; Francesca Giovanna Esposito; Marta Campanile; Andrea Di Lieto
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2012-01-16

Review 4.  A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Nasim Ketabi; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Peter Rohloff; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Comparison of the Effects of Two Auditory Methods by Mother and Fetus on the Results of Non-Stress Test (Baseline Fetal Heart Rate and Number of Accelerations) in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Roghaie Khoshkholgh; Tahereh Keshavarz; Zeinab Moshfeghy; Marzieh Akbarzadeh; Nasrin Asadi; Najaf Zare
Journal:  J Family Reprod Health       Date:  2016-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.