| Literature DB >> 35242216 |
Jinsen Zhang1,2,3,4, Xing Xiao1,2,3,4, Qinglong Guo1,2,3,4, Zixuan Wei5, Wei Hua1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Based on alterations in gene expression associated with the production of glycolysis and cholesterol, this research classified glioma into prognostic metabolic subgroups. In this study, data from the CGGA325 and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were utilized to extract single nucleotide variants (SNVs), RNA-seq expression data, copy number variation data, short insertions and deletions (InDel) mutation data, and clinical follow-up information from glioma patients. Glioma metabolic subtypes were classified using the ConsensusClusterPlus algorithm. This study determined four metabolic subgroups (glycolytic, cholesterogenic, quiescent, and mixed). Cholesterogenic patients had a higher survival chance. Genome-wide investigation revealed that inappropriate amplification of MYC and TERT was associated with improper cholesterol anabolic metabolism. In glioma metabolic subtypes, the mRNA levels of mitochondrial pyruvate carriers 1 and 2 (MPC1/2) presented deletion and amplification, respectively. Differentially upregulated genes in the glycolysis group were related to pathways, including IL-17, HIF-1, and TNF signaling pathways and carbon metabolism. Downregulated genes in the glycolysis group were enriched in terpenoid backbone biosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, butanoate metabolism, and fatty acid metabolism pathway. Cox analysis of univariate and multivariate survival showed that risks of glycolysis subtypes were significantly higher than other subtypes. Those results were validated in the CGGA325 dataset. The current findings greatly contribute to a comprehensive understanding of glioma and personalized treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242216 PMCID: PMC8886743 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9448144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Figure 1Detection of molecular subtypes of glioma. (a) Cholesterol and glycolysis genes are clustered consistently. (b) Categorization of samples based on expression levels of cholesterol and glycolysis gene. (c) Survival curves of KM in TCGA-glioma samples for four molecular subgroups. (d) KM survival curves for Glycolysis and Cholesterol subtypes in TCGA-glioma samples. (e) Heat map analysis of 26 related genes.
Figure 2Analysis of clinical characteristics and immune score among four subtypes. (a–b) Comparison of the distribution of different clinical characteristics across the four metabolic subgroups in the TCGA cohort. (c–d) Comparison of the distribution of various clinical characteristics among the four metabolic subgroups in the CGGA325 dataset.
Figure 3Comparing the immune scores between metabolic subgroups in the TCGA dataset.
Figure 4MPC complex as a possible modulator of tumor glycolysis-cholesterol production axis. (a) Distribution of mutations among glioma metabolic subtypes. (b) Comparison of differences in MYC, TERT, and IDH1 genes among metabolic subtypes. (c) Distribution of mutations and CNVs in MPC1/2 in four metabolic subgroups. (d) Comparison of the expression of MPC1/MPC2 among four metabolic subgroups. (e) Scatter plot between MPC1 and MPC2.
Figure 5Differentially expressed gene (DEG) identification between the glycolysis and cholesterol subgroups. (a) Volcano map of DEGs between the glycolysis and cholesterol grouping in TCGA dataset. (b) Heat map of DEGs between the glycolysis and cholesterol grouping in TCGA dataset. (c) Volcano map of DEGs between the glycolysis and cholesterol grouping in CGGA325 dataset. (d) Heat map of DEGs between the glycolysis and cholesterol grouping in CGGA325 dataset.
Figure 6Functional enrichment analysis in TCGA dataset. (a) A map of differentially upregulated genes in the TCGA dataset that has been annotated using BP annotation. (b) CC annotation map of genes that are differentially expressed in the TCGA dataset. (c) Map of DEGs in the TCGA dataset annotated with MF. (d) KEGG annotation map of genes that are differentially expressed in the TCGA dataset. (e) Map of DEGs in the TCGA dataset annotated with BP annotations. (f) KEGG annotation map of genes that are differentially expressed in the TCGA dataset.
Figure 7Functional enrichment analysis in CGGA325 dataset. (a) Annotation of DEGs in the CGGA325 dataset using BP. (b) CC annotation of genes that were differentially expressed in the CGGA325 dataset. (c) Annotation of DEGs in the CGGA325 dataset using MF. (d) KEGG annotation for genes that were differentially expressed in the CGGA325 dataset. (e) Annotation of the CGGA325 DEGs in the CGGA325 dataset using BP. (f) CC annotation of genes that were differentially expressed in the CGGA325 dataset. (g) Annotation of DEGs in the CGGA325 dataset using MF. (h) Annotation using KEGG for genes that were differentially expressed in the CGGA325 dataset.
Figure 8GSEA analysis. (a) GSEA results for glycolysis and cholesterol molecular subtype in TCGA dataset. (b) GSEA results for glycolysis and cholesterol molecular subtype in CGGA325 dataset.
Univariate survival Cox analysis.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI of HR |
| ||
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Age | ||||
| ≤55 | ||||
| >55 | 1.025 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 0.001 |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | ||||
| Male | 0.929 | 0.637 | 1.353 | 0.7 |
| Subtype | ||||
| Other | ||||
| Cholesterol | 0.881 | 0.559 | 1.387 | 0.584 |
| Subtype | ||||
| Other | ||||
| Glycolysis | 1.552 | 1.002 | 2.404 | 0.049 |
| Subtype | ||||
| Other | ||||
| Mixed | 0.976 | 0.644 | 1.481 | 0.91 |
| Subtype | ||||
| Other | ||||
| Quiescent | 0.84 | 0.576 | 1.227 | 0.368 |
Multivariate survival Cox analysis.
| Variables | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI of HR |
| ||
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Cholesterol | ||||
| Age | 1.445 | 0.978 | 2.134 | 0.064 |
| Gender | 0.934 | 0.637 | 1.369 | 0.726 |
| Cholesterol | 0.891 | 0.561 | 1.415 | 0.625 |
| Glycolysis | ||||
| Age | 1.468 | 0.993 | 2.171 | 0.054 |
| Gender | 0.958 | 0.655 | 1.4 | 0.824 |
| Glycolysis | 1.575 | 1.013 | 2.449 | 0.044 |
| Mixed | ||||
| Age | 1.491 | 0.999 | 2.226 | 0.051 |
| Gender | 0.9 | 0.614 | 1.318 | 0.588 |
| Mixed | 0.866 | 0.562 | 1.334 | 0.515 |
| Quiescent | ||||
| Age | 1.416 | 0.952 | 2.105 | 0.086 |
| Gender | 0.926 | 0.634 | 1.351 | 0.689 |
| Quiescent | 0.902 | 0.613 | 1.327 | 0.601 |