| Literature DB >> 35242206 |
Lanping Fu1, Fei Wang2, Zhiyi Ma3, Jin Zhang4, Wuzhong Xiong5, Le Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stroke is a common cerebrovascular disease among the middle-aged and elderly, which can lead to a series of neurological disorders. Acupuncture is an important part of traditional Chinese medicine, with great value in improving the neurological deficits of stroke patients. In addition, rehabilitation therapy is also of great significance for alleviating the neurological deficits of patients and improving their activities of daily living.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242206 PMCID: PMC8888046 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4581248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
General information table (n (%)).
| ITEM | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.021 | 0.884 | ||
| Male | 30 (57.69) | 27 (56.25) | ||
| Female | 22 (42.31) | 21 (43.75) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.087 | 0.768 | ||
| ≤65 | 21 (40.38) | 18 (37.50) | ||
| >65 | 31 (59.62) | 30 (62.50) | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.001 | 0.987 | ||
| ≤23 | 25 (48.08) | 23 (47.92) | ||
| >23 | 27 (51.92) | 25 (52.08) | ||
| Smoking history | 0.013 | 0.909 | ||
| Yes | 20 (38.46) | 19 (39.58) | ||
| No | 32 (61.54) | 29 (60.42) | ||
| Diabetes | 0.001 | 0.974 | ||
| Yes | 28 (53.85) | 26 (54.17) | ||
| No | 24 (46.15) | 22 (45.83) | ||
| Hypertension | 0.043 | 0.835 | ||
| Yes | 26 (50.00) | 25 (52.08) | ||
| No | 26 (50.00) | 23 (47.92) | ||
| Stroke type | 0.005 | 0.946 | ||
| Cerebral infarction | 35 (67.31) | 32 (66.67) | ||
| Cerebral hemorrhage | 17 (32.69) | 16 (33.33) |
Comparison of therapeutic effects between groups.
| Therapeutic effect | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markedly effective | 30 (57.69) | 22 (45.83) | — | — |
| Effective | 20 (38.46) | 16 (33.33) | — | — |
| Ineffective | 2 (3.85) | 10 (20.83) | — | — |
| Overall response rate | 50 (96.15) | 38 (79.17) | 6.821 | 0.009 |
Comparison of neurological deficit scores before and after treatment between groups.
| When | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 22.16 ± 2.7 | 22.44 ± 2.95 | 0.496 | 0.621 |
| After treatment | 11.24 ± 1.12 | 17.19 ± 1.23 | 25.32 | <0.001 |
Figure 1Comparison of plasma Cor and NPY levels between two groups before and after treatment. (a) Comparison of plasma Cor levels between two groups before and after treatment. (b) Comparison of NPY levels between two groups before and after treatment. ∗ indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 2Comparison of motor function and self-care ability between two groups before and after treatment. (a) Comparison of motor function between two groups before and after treatment. (b) Comparison of self-care ability between two groups before and after treatment. ∗ indicates P < 0.05.
Figure 3Comparison of BBS scores between two groups before and after treatment. ∗ indicates P < 0.05.
Comparison of swallowing function between groups before and after treatment.
| When | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 51.67 ± 2.6 | 51.91 ± 2.25 | 0.494 | 0.623 |
| After treatment | 81.02 ± 2.2 | 70.91 ± 2.27 | 22.61 | <0.001 |
Figure 4Comparison of negative emotion scores between two groups before and after treatment. (a) Comparison of SDS scores between two groups before and after treatment. (b) Comparison of SAS scores between two groups before and after treatment. ∗ indicates P < 0.05.
Comparison of life quality scores of between two groups after treatment.
| Items | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physiological status | 49.51 ± 2.19 | 42.46 ± 2.29 | 6.807 | <0.001 |
| Psychological status | 71.01 ± 2.49 | 60.03 ± 2.12 | 23.65 | <0.001 |
| Social relationships | 43.06 ± 1.93 | 35.32 ± 1.94 | 19.99 | <0.001 |
| Life status | 78.71 ± 2.51 | 72.12 ± 2.1 | 14.18 | <0.001 |
| Level of independence | 59.91 ± 2.32 | 53.04 ± 2.16 | 15.29 | <0.001 |