| Literature DB >> 35242120 |
Fan Xiong1,2, Sijia Chen1,2, Ivan Jakovlić3, Wenxiang Li1,2, Ming Li1,2, Hong Zou1,2, Guitang Wang1,2, Shangong Wu1,2.
Abstract
In mammals, bile acid (BA) concentrations are regulated largely by the gut microbiota, and a study has shown that some metabolic responses to the gut microbiota are conserved between zebrafish and mice. However, it remains unknown whether the influence of specific intestinal microbes on BA metabolism is conserved between higher and lower vertebrates (i.e., mammals and fish). In the present study, Citrobacter freundii GC01 isolated from the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) intestine was supplemented to the fish and mice feed. We found the changes in the bile acid profile, especially significant changes in secondary BAs in both grass carp and mice fed on C. freundii. Also, lipid metabolism was significantly affected by C. freundii. Analysis of liver transcriptome sequencing data and validation by RT-qPCR revealed that the CYP7A1 gene was significantly up-regulated in both grass carp and mice. In addition, the overexpression of HNF4B from grass carp resulted in a significant increase in the expression level of CYP7A1. Generally, our results suggest that the metabolism of BAs by intestinal microbiota is conserved across vertebrates. Furthermore, specific intestinal bacteria may regulate the bile salt synthesis through CYP7A1 and that HNF4B might be an important regulator of BA metabolism in fish.Entities:
Keywords: bile acid; fish; gut microbiota; mammals; regulation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35242120 PMCID: PMC8887563 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.824611
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1The mice gut microbiome in three groups. (A) Microbial alpha diversity in each group was calculated using four different parameters: PD_whole_tree, Chao1, Shannon and Simpson. p-value was evaluated with a non-parametric T-test. “*” indicates statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) differences between groups, and “**” indicates p-values < 0.01. PCoA plots of unweighted (B) and weighted UniFrac distances (C) between groups. (D) A histogram of logarithmic (LDA) scores computed for features differentially abundant between groups. LEfSe identifies which microbial clades amongst those detected as statistically differential will explain the greatest differences among the communities, where the black bar represents those of greater abundance in the control group, the blue bar for those in the LD group, and the red bar for those in the HD group. The proportions of Citrobacter (E) and Lachnoclostridium (F) in the three groups. The groups were named according to the supplemented C. freundii dose: Control = 0, LD = low, and HD = high.
FIGURE 2Fluctuation of the gut content bile acids in grass carp (A) and mice (B). The “*” indicates statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) differences compared with the control group.
FIGURE 3(A) The KEGG enrichment analysis of the grass carp liver transcriptome data. The y-axis shows the names of pathways. The names of metabolism-related pathways are marked by the red font. The x-axis shows the log value of DEGs count in each pathway. The blue circles indicate enriched DEGs between the LD and control groups, and the red circles indicate enriched DEGs between the HD and control groups. The size of each circle corresponds to the magnitude of fold-change. The “*” symbol in the middle of circles indicates that enrichment in that pathway was significant when compared with the control group (p value < 0.05). (B) Heatmap and clustering of DEGs associated with lipid metabolism in liver samples. Cluster analysis performed on Bray-Curtis distance matrices of DEGs using the unweighted pair group mean algorithm (UPGMA). The colored bars to the left indicate the group identity of samples: the green bar represents the control group, the blue bar represents the LD group, and the red bar represents the HD group.
FIGURE 4(A) Hierarchical clustering heatmap of transcriptional analysis of lipid metabolism-related gene expression in the grass carp liver. The two experimental groups are on the x-axis, whereas names of lipid metabolism-related genes are on the y-axis. The expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in the livers of grass carp (B) and mice (C) inferred using qPCR. The x-axis shows the names of genes, and the y-axis indicates the Log 2 fold change with the relative expression (compared to the Control group) of each gene. * indicates statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Hepatic lipid accumulation in a grass carp fed a diet supplemented with Citrobacter freundii GC01: visualization and quantification of lipids in grass carp liver samples using the Oil red-O staining. Scale bar = 50 μm. The small blue spots are nuclei (blue arrows), whereas the red nearly spherical dots are lipid droplets (black arrows). * p-value < 0.05 compared with the control group. Values represent means ± sem. **p-value < 0.01 compared with the control group.
FIGURE 6Changes of serum biochemical indexes in different experimental groups of grass carp. * indicates statistically significant (p-value < 0.05).