| Literature DB >> 35241957 |
Sangita Mitra1, Rupa Harsha1, Niladri Hazra1, Abhijit Mazumdar1.
Abstract
The assessment of the morphological and reproductive features of white rice leafhopper Cofana spectra (Distant) was carried out using selected characters that bear importance in determining the fitness at the individual and population levels. Morphometric measurements of the individuals reared in the laboratory as normal and stylopized with the strepsipteran parasitoid, Halictophagus australensis Perkins, were recorded and analyzed. A t-test was performed to justify whether parasitization by H. australensis affected the traits. Correlations and regression analyses were carried out to deduce the difference in relative importance of the morphological features in the life history of C. spectra and their variation because of stylopization by H. australensis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was applied on the morphometric data to further substantiate the difference observed in the traits. In case of stylopized white leafhopper (WLH), fecundity was inhibited almost completely irrespective of seasons. The effect of stylopization on the life history traits of C. spectra has been noted that supports its possible use in biocontrol.Entities:
Keywords: Cofana spectra; Halictophagus australensis; Strepsiptera; leafhopper; parasitoid; rice pest
Year: 2014 PMID: 35241957 PMCID: PMC8848068 DOI: 10.4137/IJIS.S13029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Insect Sci ISSN: 1179-5433
The values (range, mean ± SE) of different morphological traits of C. spectra for normal males: n = 21 and normal females: n = 31, and for infected males: n = 12 and infected females: n = 21.
| WL | BL | WS | FL | LL | AL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 6–6.6, 5.62 ± 0.49 | 6.4–8, 7.29 ± 0.42 | 1.04–1.28, 1.11 ± 0.06 | 1.4–1.8, 1.49 ± 0.11 | 5.8–7.86, 6.65 ± 0.58 | 0.24–0.32, 0.28 ± 0.03 |
|
| |||||
| 5.4–7, 6.06 ± 0.45 | 7.2–9.2, 7.91 ± 0.56 | 1.04–1.6, 1.29 ± 0.2 | 1.44–2, 1.67 ± 0.15 | 5.8–7.4, 6.52 ± 0.42 | 0.28–0.44, 0.35 ± 0.06 |
Figure 1.The box plot representations of the degree of dimorphisms in the morphological traits of C. spectra.
The results of t-test indicating that the degree of dimorphism is inclined toward females, because all values have a mean of >1.
| MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT | WLDD | BLDD | WSDD | FLDD | LLDD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 5.059 | 5.378 | 12.673 | 5.935 | 2.989 |
| Infected | 3.958 | 2.579 | 7.366 | 2.769 | 3.266 |
All t-values are significant at P < 0.05.
Abbreviations: WLDD, WL degree of dimorphism; BLDD, BL degree of dimorphism; WSDD, WS degree of dimorphism; FLDD, FL degree of dimorphism; LLDD, LL degree of dimorphism.
Figure 2.The difference between the morphological traits of C. spectra expressed as a ratio of the normal to infected individuals (normal males: n = 21; normal females: n = 31; infected males: n = 12; infected females: n = 21).
Results of t-test on the deviation of the morphological traits of infected individuals from the mean values of normal individuals for respective sexes of C. spectra.
| FEMALE TRAITS | WL | BL | WS | FL | LL | OL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.442 |
Values that are significant at P < 0.05 level are marked as bold.
Table values: for infected males, t0.05(1),12 = 1.782; for infected females, t0.05(1),21 = 1.714.
The results of PCA of the morphological traits of normal male C. spectra. A. Bartlett sphericity test c = 84.246, df = 15, P < 0.001. B. eigenvalues and factor loadings for the morphometric variables. the highest factor loadings are marked in bold.
| A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BL |
| ||||
| WS |
|
| |||
| FL |
|
|
| ||
| LL |
|
| 0.417 |
| |
| AL |
| 0.410 |
| 0.234 | 0.163 |
Results of PCA of the morphological traits of infected female C. spectra. Bartlett sphericity test χ2 = 60.21, df = 15, P < 0.001. A. Correlation matrix (values in bold indicate significance at P < 0.05. B. Eigenvalues and factor loadings for the morphometric variables. The highest factor loadings are marked in bold.
| A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | WL | BL | WS | FL | LL |
| BL |
| ||||
| WS |
|
| |||
| FL |
| 0.398 | 0.364 | ||
| LL | 0.049 | 0.075 | 0.113 | 0.368 | |
| OL |
|
|
| 0.389 | -0.061 |
Figure 3.A biplot showing the ordination of morphological traits of male C. spectra.
Figure 4.A biplot showing the ordination of morphological traits of female C. spectra.
The regression equations using WL as explanatory variable for LL and AL of males, and LL and OL of females of normal and infected C. spectra.
| NORMAL | INFECTED |
|---|---|
|
| |
| LL( | LL( |
| AL( | AL( |
|
| |
| LL( | LL( |
| OL( | OL( |
Results of PCA of the morphological traits of normal female C. spectra. Bartlett sphericity test χ2 = 94.019, df = 15, P < 0.001. A. Correlation matrix (values in bold indicate significance at P < 0.05). B. Eigenvalues and factor loadings for the morphometric variables. The highest factor loadings are marked in bold.
| A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | WL | BL | WS | FL | LL |
| BL |
| ||||
| WS |
| 0.349 | |||
| FL |
|
|
| ||
| LL |
| 0.156 | 0.103 |
| |
| OL |
|
| 0.222 |
| 0.164 |
Results of PCA of the morphological traits of infected male C. spectra. Bartlett sphericity test χ2 = 42.09, df = 15, P < 0.001. A. Correlation matrix (values in bold indicate significance at P < 0.05. B. Eigenvalues and factor loadings for the morphometric variables. The highest factor loadings are marked in bold.
| A | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLES | WL | BL | WS | FL | LL |
| BL | 0.407 | ||||
| WS | 0.392 | 0.417 | |||
| FL | 0.178 | 0.545 | -0.086 | ||
| LL | 0.158 |
| 0.219 |
| |
| LA | -0.043 | 0.414 | -0.334 |
|
|