| Literature DB >> 35241900 |
Nada Binmadi1, Louae Harere2, Ajwad Mattar2, Suad Aljohani1, Nada Alhindi1, Sarah Ali1, Soulafa Almazrooa1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) causes significant harm to the oral cavity and is considered a risk factor for oral cancer. Various forms, products, and patterns of SLT are used across different populations. Many products, such as nicotine and betel nut, have addictive and carcinogenic properties. SLT use is associated with benign, premalignant, or malignant lesions. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of these oral lesions and their association with SLT exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Oral cancer; Retrospective; Smokeless tobacco; Squamous cell carcinoma
Year: 2021 PMID: 35241900 PMCID: PMC8864373 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Characteristics of the study population including demographic, clinical, treatment, and follow up data comparing SCC and non-SCC patients.
| Parameters | All Population (n = 59) | SCC (n = 11) | Non-SCC (n = 48) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Mean ± SD | 41.90 ± 13.25 | 53.64 ± 12.2 | 39.15 ± 12.03 | 0.001 |
| Sex | Male | 53 (89.8%) | 7 (63.6%) | 46 (95.8%) | 0.001 |
| Female | 6 (10.2%) | 4 (36.4%) | 2 (4.2%) | ||
| Nationality | Saudi | 20 (33.9%) | 2 (18.2%) | 18 (37.5%) | 0.591 |
| Non-Saudi | 33 (55.9%) | 5 (45.5%) | 28 (58.3%) | ||
| Medical history | Healthy | 28 (47.5%) | 0 (0) | 28 (58.3%) | <0.001 |
| Chronic illness | 20 (33.9%) | 3 (27.3%) | 17 (35.4%) | ||
| Malignancy | 4 (6.8%) | 3 (27.3%) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Type of smokeless tobacco | Non-tobacco | 8 (13.6%) | 2 (12.8%) | 6 (12.5%) | 0.233 |
| Tobacco alone | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Tobacco with alkalizing agents | 23 (39%) | 1 (9.1%) | 22 (45.8%) | ||
| Tobacco with alkalizing agents and areca or betel | 9 (15.3%) | 1 (9.1%) | 8 (16.7%) | ||
| More than one agent | 2 (3.4%) | 1 (9.1%) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Frequency of smokeless tobacco (per day) | 1–3 times | 15 (25.4%) | 2 (18.2%) | 13 (27.1%) | 0.015 |
| 4–6 times | 14 (22%) | 2 (18.2%) | 13 (27.1%) | ||
| 6–10 times | 8 (5.1%) | 5 (45.5%) | 3 (6.3%) | ||
| More than 10 times | 5 (18.6%) | 1 (9.1%) | 10 (20.8%) | ||
| Duration (years) | Mean ± SD | 12.02 ± 8.91 | 9.0 ± 6.3 | 12.33 ± 9.14 | 0.257 |
| Location of the lesion | No lesion | 3 (5.1%) | 0 (0) | 3 (6.3%) | 0.003 |
| Upper labial vestibule unilateral | 14 (23.7%) | 0 (0) | 14 (29.2%) | ||
| Lower labial vestibule unilateral | 8 (13.6%) | 0 (0) | 8 (16.7%) | ||
| Labial vestibule bilateral | 2 (3.4%) | 0 (0) | 2(4.2%) | ||
| Buccal bilateral | 5 (8.5%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (10.4%) | ||
| Buccal unilateral | 16 (27.1%) | 8 (72.7%) | 8 (16.7%) | ||
| Palate | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Floor of the mouth | 3 (5.1%) | 2 (18.2%) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Adjusted size (cm) | Mean ± SD | 2.56 ± 1.37 mm | 4.0 ± 1.63 | 2.3 ± 1.2 | 0.001 |
| Demarcation | Poorly demarcated | 25 (42.4%) | 11 (100%) | 14 (29.2%) | <0.001 |
| Well demarcated | 22 (37.3%) | 0 (0) | 22 (45.8%) | ||
| Biopsy | No | 41 (69.5%) | 0 (0) | 41 (85.4%) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 18 (30.5%) | 11 (100%) | 7 (14.6%) | ||
| Change/stopping of the habit | No | 15 (25.4%) | 0 (0) | 15 (31.3%) | 0.117 |
| Yes | 20 (33.9%) | 3 (27.3%) | 17 (35.4%) | ||
| Follow-up lesion change (only the cases with follow up confirmation were counted) | No | 6 (10.2%) | 0 (0) | 6 (12.5%) | 0.009 |
| Healed | 13 (22%) | 2 (18.2%) | 11 (22.9%) | ||
| Remarkable regression | 5 (8.5%) | 0 (0) | 5 (10.4%) | ||
| Died | 2 (3.4%) | 2 (18.2%) | 0 (0) | ||
| Recurrent | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Histopathology | No | 42 (71.2%) | 0 (0) | 42 (87.5%) | <0.001 |
| Hyperkeratosis | 6 (10.2%) | 0 (0) | 6 (12.5%) | ||
| SSC | 11 (18.6%) | 11 (100%) | 0 (0) | ||
| Color | White | 30 (50.8%) | 2 (18.2%) | 28 (58.3%) | <0.001 |
| Red | 8 (13.6%) | 8 (72.7%) | 0 (0) | ||
| Red and white | 3 (22%) | 1 (9.1%) | 2 (4.7%) | ||
| Black | 1 (1.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.1%) | ||
| Grayish white | 8 (13.6%) | 0 (0) | 8(16.7%) |
SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SD, standard deviation.
Statistically significant p-value.
follow up record after surgical treatment.
Some data not available.
Fig. 1Follow up of the non-cancerous SLT lesions, A- Bar chart showing the patients' follow up for non-cancerous SLT lesions. B- Patients with smokeless tobacco keratosis located at the right side of the labial mucosa. C- Follow up after 10 weeks, the patient quit the habit, and the lesion is almost resolved. (SLT, smokeless tobacco).
Fig. 2Gender distribution among SCC and Non-SCC groups. A bar chart showing gender distribution in SCC and non-SCC SLT users. (SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SLT, smokeless tobacco).