Literature DB >> 35241565

Long-term Outcome of Triple Stapling Resection and J Pouch Anal Stapling Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis.

Hidejiro Kawahara1,2, Nobuo Omura2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with J pouch anal anastomosis, which was created at the dentate line by our original procedure using staplers, Triple Stapling Resection and J pouch Anal Stapling Anastomosis (TSRJASA), for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. UC patients have undergone TSRJASA since it was introduced in our institution. However, the long-term outcome of TSRJASA for UC patients has not been elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2018, fourteen patients with ulcerative colitis, including three cases of concomitant cancer, who underwent TSRJASA were enrolled in this study. Anal manometry was performed using the Pock Monitor GMMS-100 system (STAR MEDICAL, INC., Tokyo, Japan) one and two years after surgery. Maximum resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and the length of the high-pressure zone were measured. Fecal incontinence was evaluated using the Wexner incontinence questionnaire.
RESULTS: J pouch anal anastomosis was created at the dentate line in all patients. In a manometric examination two years after surgery, maximum resting pressure was 75.3 (54-88) mm Hg, maximum squeeze pressure was 125.0 (90-160) mm Hg, and the length of the high-pressure zone was 39.6 (35-42) mm. Wexner score was 2.8 (1-4).
CONCLUSION: TSRJASA is a useful procedure for UC patients given its acceptable defecation function.
Copyright © 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stapling resection; iliac pouch; rectourethral muscle; stapling anastomosis; ulcerative colitis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35241565      PMCID: PMC8931897          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  9 in total

1.  Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Saigusa; T Kurahashi; T Nakamura; H Sugimura; S Baba; H Konno; S Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Anthropometric Assessment After Proctocolectomy Due to Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Hidejiro Kawahara; Yuki Hiramoto; Mitsumasa Takeda; Nori Matsumoto; Takeyuki Misawa; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  A G Parks; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-08

5.  Functional outcomes in patients with mucosal ulcerative colitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis by the double stapling technique: is there a relation to tissue type?

Authors:  J S Choi; F Potenti; S D Wexner; Y S Nam; Y H Hwang; J J Nogueras; E G Weiss; A J Pikarsky
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation.

Authors:  R J Heald; D R Allen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Chronic inflammatory changes in the anal transition zone after stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is mucosectomy a superior alternative?

Authors:  Mark T Silvestri; Roger D Hurst; Michele A Rubin; Fabrizio Michelassi; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Cuff-less J Pouch Anal Stapling Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis.

Authors:  Hidejiro Kawahara; Tadashi Akiba; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy young adults: evidence from Vietnam.

Authors:  Le Manh Cuong; Ha Van Quyet; Tran Manh Hung; Nguyen Ngoc Anh; Tran Thu Ha; Vu Van Du; Do Van Loi; Ha Huu Hoang Khai; Vu Duy Kien
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.