Literature DB >> 35241300

Immunological features that associate with the strength of antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

Takahiro Kageyama1, Shigeru Tanaka1, Keishi Etori1, Koto Hattori1, Kazusa Miyachi1, Tadamichi Kasuya1, Taro Iwamoto1, Kei Ikeda1, Hidetoshi Igari2, Koutaro Yokote3, Hiroshi Nakajima4.   

Abstract

Predictive clinical factors associated with favorable responses to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 have been reported in some studies; however, there is a subgroup with low antibodytiters without well-known clinical factors reducing antibody responses. To clarify the immunological backgrounds that underlie the difference in antibody responses, we analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of each 20 individuals with a high anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer and a low antibody titer out of 1774 healthcare workers who received BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. A higher percentage of B cells before vaccination was associated with a higher antibody titer. Among B cells, naïve and transitional B cell frequencies were positively correlated with a higher antibody titer, whereas the frequencies of late memory B cells and plasmablasts were associated with a lower antibody titer. Fold change in the frequency of activated CD8+ T cells upon vaccination was also correlated with high antibody titers.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BNT162b2; COVID-19; PBMC; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine; naïve B cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35241300      PMCID: PMC8872843          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   4.169


Introduction

It has been reported that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine contributed to reducing the severity of COVID-19 [1]. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is progressing around the world at an unprecedented rate [2]. However, the pandemic of COVID-19 has led to many SARS-CoV-2 variants, some of which have been highly transmissible and partially resistant to immune responses obtained from previous infection or vaccination [3]. Although BNT162b2 has been shown to induce vaccine-elicited neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 variants so far [4], [5], it may be required to improve vaccines before the virus acquires critical mutations. As the humoral responses play vital roles in the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection [6], [7], the antibody titer status after vaccination can provide essential information to develop better vaccines and optimize vaccination strategies. We have previously reported favorable antibody responses to BNT162b2 and their predictive clinical factors in 2015 healthcare workers [8]. Although age has been repeatedly shown to be associated with a lower antibody response among demographic factors [9], [10], there is a subgroup with low antibody titers even in young populations without well-known factors reducing antibody responses such as taking immunosuppressive agents and glucocorticoids [8]. Therefore, we aimed to clarify the immunological backgrounds that underlie the difference in antibody responses. To address this issue, we investigated immunophenotypic characteristics in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), collected both before and after vaccination, among high and low responders to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Material and methods

Participants

We recruited 2015 healthcare workers in Chiba University Hospital who received the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer, Inc., and BioNTech) at Chiba University Hospital COVID-19 Vaccine Center [8]. Following written, informed consent, blood samples were collected from the participants. Among participants whose blood samples were successfully obtained before and after vaccination (n = 1774), 878 out of 1774 individuals provided blood samples for PBMCs preparation. We selected 20 high responders and 20 low responders against the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine based on anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer under the conditions that factors that may affect the antibody titers, such as age, sex, comorbidities, current medication, the time between 1st and 2nd dose, and the time between 2nd dose and sample collection, were as consistent as possible between two groups. They were between their 20 s and 40 s in age and did not have a history of COVID-19. No one takes oral steroids or immunosuppressive agents. The study procedures for sample collection and those for analyses were approved by Chiba University Ethics Committee on February 24th, 2021 (No. HS202101-03) and April 21st, 2021 (No. HS202104-01), respectively.

Sample collection and peripheral blood mononuclear cell preparation

Blood samples were obtained 0–2 weeks before the 1st dose and 2–3 weeks after the 2nd dose of vaccination. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were stored in liquid nitrogen until analysis.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody test

Anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody was measured by Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2S on Cobas 8000 e801 module as described elsewhere [8].

Flow cytometry analyses

PBMCs were first stained with either Zombie Green (for T cell and B cell staining panel) (Biolegend) or Zombie NIR (for monocyte staining panel) (Biolegend) to label dead cells. Then the samples were treated with Human TruStain FcX (Biolegend) to block Fc receptors. For the analysis of T cells, cells were stained with antibodies against CCR7 (150503, BD), CD4 (RPA-T4, Biolegend), CD45RA (HI100, BD), CD38 (HIT2, BD), CD8 (SK1, BD), CD3 (UCHT1, BD), and HLA-DR (G46-6, BD). For the analysis of B cells, cells were stained with antibodies against CD24 (ML5, BD), CD19 (SJ25C1, BD), CD27 (O323, Biolegend), CD38, CD20 (2H7, BD), and IgD (IA6-2, BD). For the analysis of monocytes, cells were stained with antibodies against CD16 (B73.1, BD), CD14 (MfP9, BD), and HLA-DR. The gating strategies were shown in Fig. S1. Data were collected by a Canto II (BD) and analyzed by FlowJo software (BD).

Analyses and visualization

The percentages of each cell subset were evaluated for each individual. T cells, B cells, and monocytes are shown as % in live cells. CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells are shown as % in T cells. Activated CD4+ T cells, naïve CD4+ T cells, effector CD4+ T cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and effector memory CD4+ T cells are shown as % in CD4+ T cells. Activated CD8+ T cells, naïve CD8+ T cells, effector CD8+ T cells, central memory CD8+ T cells, and effector memory CD8+ T cells are shown as % in CD8+ T cells. Plasmablasts, naïve B cells, IgM+ memory B cells, class-switched memory B cells, late memory B cells, and transitional B cells are shown as % in B cells. Classical monocytes, intermediate monocytes, and non-classical monocytes are shown as % in monocytes. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer and the percentage of each cell subset. For Fig. 1 , the heatmap shows the z-scored percentage of each cell subset along with the antibody titer and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rs. For Fig. 2 , the fold change of each cell subset after the vaccination was calculated, and the correlation with the antibody titer was tested using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Fig. 1

The correlation between the proportion of immune cell subsets in PBMCs before vaccination and the anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer. The heatmap shows the z-scored percentage of each cell subset in PBMCs before vaccination. One line of the heatmap and the bar diagram on the right represents the data of each individual. The bar diagram displays anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer (Log10U/mL) after vaccination. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rs between anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer and the percentage of each cell subset are plotted above the heatmap. Red dots indicate those with a significant difference.

Fig. 2

The correlation between the fold change of each cell subset upon vaccination in PBMCs and the anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer. The heatmap shows the fold change of each cell subset in PBMCs upon vaccination. One line of the heatmap and the bar diagram on the right represents the data of each individual. Seven gray tiles indicate missing data due to technical errors. The bar diagram displays anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer (Log10U/mL) after vaccination. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rs between anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer and the percentage of each cell subset are plotted above the heatmap. Red dots indicate those with a significant difference.

The correlation between the proportion of immune cell subsets in PBMCs before vaccination and the anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer. The heatmap shows the z-scored percentage of each cell subset in PBMCs before vaccination. One line of the heatmap and the bar diagram on the right represents the data of each individual. The bar diagram displays anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer (Log10U/mL) after vaccination. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rs between anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer and the percentage of each cell subset are plotted above the heatmap. Red dots indicate those with a significant difference. The correlation between the fold change of each cell subset upon vaccination in PBMCs and the anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer. The heatmap shows the fold change of each cell subset in PBMCs upon vaccination. One line of the heatmap and the bar diagram on the right represents the data of each individual. Seven gray tiles indicate missing data due to technical errors. The bar diagram displays anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer (Log10U/mL) after vaccination. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient Rs between anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer and the percentage of each cell subset are plotted above the heatmap. Red dots indicate those with a significant difference.

Results

Selection of high and low responders to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine

We selected 20 young individuals with a low antibody titer after vaccination out of 1774 healthcare workers who received 2 doses of BNT162N2 and 20 age- and sex-matched individuals with a high antibody titer. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 or a detectable antibody titer (≥0.4 U/mL) before the vaccination were excluded from the study. Individuals who were taking oral glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive medication were also excluded. The median antibody titer was 4965 U/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 3888–6530) in the high responder group, while the median antibody titer was 445.0 U/mL (IQR 325.5–552.3) in the low responder group. Detailed background information is provided in Table 1 .
Table 1

Background information of high and low responders to the BNT162b2 vaccine.

High responders (n = 20)Low responders (n = 20)
Age, year, median (IQR)33.5 (28.0–40.5)35.5 (26.8–40.3)
Sex (female:male), n10:109:11
Post-vaccine anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody titer, U/mL, median (IQR)4965 (3888–6530)445.0 (325.5–552.3)
Alcohol consumption
 No, n (%)8 (40)4 (20)
 Sometimes, n (%)12 (60)13 (65)
 Every day, n (%)0 (0)3 (15)
Smoking
Never, n (%)17 (85)15 (75)
Ex-smoker, n (%)2 (10)3 (15)
Current smoker, n (%)1 (5)2 (10)
Time between 1st and 2nd dose, day, mean (SD)21.1 (0.5)21.0 (0.2)
Time between 2nd dose and sample collection, day, median (IQR)14 (14–21)15 (14–21)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension, n (%)1 (5)1 (5)
 Dyslipidemia, n (%)1 (5)1 (5)
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)0 (0)1 (5)
 Malignancy, n (%)1 (5)0 (0)
 Atopic dermatitis, n (%)2 (10)1 (5)
 Asthma, n (%)7 (35)2 (10)
 Thyroid disease, n (%)0 (0)1 (0)
Current medication
Hypertension, n (%)1 (5)1 (5)
Dyslipidemia, n (%)1 (5)0 (0)
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)0 (0)1 (5)
 Allergy, n (%)2 (10)1 (5)
 Inhaled corticosteroid, n (%)2 (10)0 (0)
 Glucocorticoids, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)
 Immunosuppressant, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)
Thyroid disease, n (%)0 (0)1 (5)

IQR, interquartile range. SD, standard deviation.

Background information of high and low responders to the BNT162b2 vaccine. IQR, interquartile range. SD, standard deviation.

Differences in immune cell fractions in PBMCs between high and low responders before vaccination

We quantified the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells, and monocytes in PBMCs, as shown in Fig. S1. Interestingly, the percentage of B cells was positively correlated with a higher antibody titer, while the percentages of T cells and monocytes were not (Fig. 1). Among B cells, naïve and transitional B cell frequencies were positively correlated with a higher antibody titer, whereas the frequencies of late memory B cells and plasmablasts were associated with a lower antibody titer (Fig. 1). To our surprise, the frequencies of CD4+ T cell subsets (e.g., naïve, effector, effector memory, and central memory) were not significantly associated with antibody titers despite the well-known roles of CD4+ T cells in antibody responses. Also, there was no correlation between antibody titers and intermediate monocytes, which are important for antigen presentation. These results suggest that the abundance of naïve and immature B cells is associated with the robust antibody response against the BNT162b2 vaccine.

Differences in immune cell fractions in PBMCs between high and low responders after vaccination

We also analyzed the changes in cell fractions after the vaccination. The increased frequency of activated CD8+ T cells was positively correlated with a higher antibody titer (Fig. 2). In addition, there was a trend to have higher induction of activated CD4+ T cells in high responders (Fig. 2). These results suggest that the robust T cells responses on the BNT162b2 vaccine are associated with high antibody responses.

Discussion

Recently, through the analysis of human naïve B cells, some naïve antibodies have been shown to bind to the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 and can neutralize SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses even in the absence of somatic mutations [11], [12]. Furthermore, although the clinical settings are different from our study, kidney transplant recipients and dialysis patients have diminished humoral responses to BNT162b2 with reduced B cells [13]. These results suggest that the abundance of naïve B cells may be associated with the presence of a diverse BCR repertoire, which induces a good antibody response. This notion is consistent with previous findings that high antibody titers are significantly associated with younger age groups [8], [9], [10], who are thought to have more naive B cells. Meanwhile, some studies have examined the relationship between B cell fractions and antibody production with influenza vaccines, the most widely used vaccine in humans, and have reported that naïve B cells do not correlate with high antibody responses [14], [15]. We speculate that the discrepancy between the current study on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and studies on influenza vaccines may be due to the presence of virus-specific memory B cells by previous infections or vaccines [16]. We also speculate that immune responses to the mRNA vaccine may differ from those to the usual inactivated vaccine. T cell activation after the vaccination is also associated with high antibody titers (Fig. 2), which may suggest broad immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine. Further studies are required to know whether the relation between naïve B cells and the response to BNT162b2 is still observed if vaccination against COVID-19 is repeated over the years. There are several limitations to this study. The major limitation of our study is the small sample size that could be analyzed. Further studies are required to consolidate our observations. Second, the backgrounds of the subjects were not completely matched between the groups; more participants had allergic diseases in the high responder group (Table 1). In this regard, our previous report described the association between the antibody titers and medication for allergy [8]. Unfortunately, we do not have a clear answer whether medication for allergy or the presence of allergic diseases itself is an independent factor predicting the antibody response to BNT162b2. However, there was no obvious bias in the proportion of each cell subset within the high responder group depending on the presence or absence of allergic diseases (data not shown). Also, there were significant correlations between antibody titers and the percentages of B cell subsets even when participants with allergic diseases were excluded from the analyses (data not shown). Therefore, we considered the frequencies of naïve and transitional B cells rather than allergic diseases to be a key factor in explaining the response to BNT162b2. Third, at this stage, this study did not convince the clinical importance of analyzing the specific B cell subsets prior to vaccination. However, the relationship between specific B cell subsets and favorable responses to vaccines revealed in this study may have important implications for future vaccine development. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that high proportions of naïve and transitional B cells before vaccination are associated with good responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine, although the mechanisms remain unknown. Since BNT162b2 is the first mRNA vaccine to be widely used in humans, this study has important insights into vaccine development. In order to control the pandemic of COVID-19, we need to promote faster and more effective vaccination, analyzing the data obtained from ongoing vaccinations.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from JST [Moonshot R&D] [Grant Number JPMJMS2025] and a donation to Chiba University Hospital and the Future Medicine Foundation at Chiba University.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  16 in total

1.  Naive human B cells engage the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2, variants of concern, and related sarbecoviruses.

Authors:  Jared Feldman; Julia Bals; Clara G Altomare; Kerri St Denis; Evan C Lam; Blake M Hauser; Larance Ronsard; Maya Sangesland; Thalia Bracamonte Moreno; Vintus Okonkwo; Nathania Hartojo; Alejandro B Balazs; Goran Bajic; Daniel Lingwood; Aaron G Schmidt
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2021-12-10

2.  Global analyses of human immune variation reveal baseline predictors of postvaccination responses.

Authors:  John S Tsang; Pamela L Schwartzberg; Yuri Kotliarov; Angelique Biancotto; Zhi Xie; Ronald N Germain; Ena Wang; Matthew J Olnes; Manikandan Narayanan; Hana Golding; Susan Moir; Howard B Dickler; Shira Perl; Foo Cheung
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7.

Authors:  Pengfei Wang; Manoj S Nair; Lihong Liu; Sho Iketani; Yang Luo; Yicheng Guo; Maple Wang; Jian Yu; Baoshan Zhang; Peter D Kwong; Barney S Graham; John R Mascola; Jennifer Y Chang; Michael T Yin; Magdalena Sobieszczyk; Christos A Kyratsous; Lawrence Shapiro; Zizhang Sheng; Yaoxing Huang; David D Ho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data.

Authors:  Eric J Haas; Frederick J Angulo; John M McLaughlin; Emilia Anis; Shepherd R Singer; Farid Khan; Nati Brooks; Meir Smaja; Gabriel Mircus; Kaijie Pan; Jo Southern; David L Swerdlow; Luis Jodar; Yeheskel Levy; Sharon Alroy-Preis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting.

Authors:  Noa Dagan; Noam Barda; Eldad Kepten; Oren Miron; Shay Perchik; Mark A Katz; Miguel A Hernán; Marc Lipsitch; Ben Reis; Ran D Balicer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Antibody responses to BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and their predictors among healthcare workers in a tertiary referral hospital in Japan.

Authors:  Takahiro Kageyama; Kei Ikeda; Shigeru Tanaka; Toshibumi Taniguchi; Hidetoshi Igari; Yoshihiro Onouchi; Atsushi Kaneda; Kazuyuki Matsushita; Hideki Hanaoka; Taka-Aki Nakada; Seiji Ohtori; Ichiro Yoshino; Hisahiro Matsubara; Toshinori Nakayama; Koutaro Yokote; Hiroshi Nakajima
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Rapid detection of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants in post-vaccination sera.

Authors:  Kei Miyakawa; Sundararaj Stanleyraj Jeremiah; Hideaki Kato; Yutaro Yamaoka; Hirofumi Go; Satoshi Yajima; Tomoko Shimada; Takahiro Mihara; Atsushi Goto; Takeharu Yamanaka; Akihide Ryo
Journal:  J Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 6.216

8.  Longitudinal Isolation of Potent Near-Germline SARS-CoV-2-Neutralizing Antibodies from COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Christoph Kreer; Matthias Zehner; Timm Weber; Meryem S Ercanoglu; Lutz Gieselmann; Cornelius Rohde; Sandro Halwe; Michael Korenkov; Philipp Schommers; Kanika Vanshylla; Veronica Di Cristanziano; Hanna Janicki; Reinhild Brinker; Artem Ashurov; Verena Krähling; Alexandra Kupke; Hadas Cohen-Dvashi; Manuel Koch; Jan Mathis Eckert; Simone Lederer; Nico Pfeifer; Timo Wolf; Maria J G T Vehreschild; Clemens Wendtner; Ron Diskin; Henning Gruell; Stephan Becker; Florian Klein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Antibody Status and Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Health Care Workers.

Authors:  Sheila F Lumley; Denise O'Donnell; Nicole E Stoesser; Philippa C Matthews; Alison Howarth; Stephanie B Hatch; Brian D Marsden; Stuart Cox; Tim James; Fiona Warren; Liam J Peck; Thomas G Ritter; Zoe de Toledo; Laura Warren; David Axten; Richard J Cornall; E Yvonne Jones; David I Stuart; Gavin Screaton; Daniel Ebner; Sarah Hoosdally; Meera Chand; Derrick W Crook; Anne-Marie O'Donnell; Christopher P Conlon; Koen B Pouwels; A Sarah Walker; Tim E A Peto; Susan Hopkins; Timothy M Walker; Katie Jeffery; David W Eyre
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Human germinal centres engage memory and naive B cells after influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Jackson S Turner; Julian Q Zhou; Julianna Han; Aaron J Schmitz; Amena A Rizk; Wafaa B Alsoussi; Tingting Lei; Mostafa Amor; Katherine M McIntire; Philip Meade; Shirin Strohmeier; Rafael I Brent; Sara T Richey; Alem Haile; Yuhe R Yang; Michael K Klebert; Teresa Suessen; Sharlene Teefey; Rachel M Presti; Florian Krammer; Steven H Kleinstein; Andrew B Ward; Ali H Ellebedy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  1 in total

1.  Incidence of COVID-19 Vaccination-Related Uveitis and Effects of Booster Dose in a Tertiary Uveitis Referral Center.

Authors:  Milton C Chew; Shaan Wiryasaputra; Meihui Wu; Wei Boon Khor; Anita S Y Chan
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.