Literature DB >> 35241104

SATB2-associated syndrome: characterization of skeletal features and of bone fragility in a prospective cohort of 19 patients.

M Mouillé1,2, M Rio1, S Breton3, M L Piketty4, A Afenjar5, J Amiel1, Y Capri6, A Goldenberg7, C Francannet8, C Michot1,9, C Mignot5,10, L Perrin6, C Quelin11, J Van Gils12, G Barcia13, V Pingault13, G Maruani14, E Koumakis9,15, V Cormier-Daire16,17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with pathogenic variants in SATB2 display intellectual disability, speech and behavioral disorders, dental abnormalities and often features of Pierre Robin sequence. SATB2 encodes a transcription factor thought to play a role in bone remodeling. The primary aim of our study was to systematically review the skeletal manifestations of SATB2-associated syndrome. For this purpose, we performed a non-interventional, multicenter cohort study, from 2017 to 2018. We included 19 patients, 9 females and 10 males ranging in age from 2 to 19 years-old. The following data were collected prospectively for each patient: clinical data, bone markers and calcium and phosphate metabolism parameters, skeletal X-rays and bone mineral density.
RESULTS: Digitiform impressions were present in 8/14 patients (57%). Vertebral compression fractures affected 6/17 patients (35%). Skeletal demineralization (16/17, 94%) and cortical thinning of vertebrae (15/17) were the most frequent radiological features at the spine. Long bones were generally demineralized (18/19). The distal phalanges were short, thick and abnormally shaped. C-telopeptide (CTX) and Alkaline phosphatase levels were in the upper normal values and osteocalcin and serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were both increased. Vitamin D insufficiency was frequent (66.7%).
CONCLUSION: We conclude that SATB2 pathogenic variants are responsible for skeletal demineralization and osteoporosis. We found increased levels of bone formation markers, supporting the key role of SATB2 in osteoblast differentiation. These results support the need for bone evaluation in children and adult patients with SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS).
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALP; Bone densitometry; Demineralization; Osteoporosis; SATB2; X Ray

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35241104      PMCID: PMC8895909          DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02229-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.123


Introduction

SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS, Glass syndrome, OMIM612313) is a rare autosomal dominant condition [1-4], related to SATB2 mutations, characterized by intellectual disability, speech and behavioral disorders, dental abnormalities such as malposition and macrodontia and often features of Pierre Robin sequence with cleft palate. SATB2 (special AT rich sequence binding protein 2) is a highly conserved gene located on chromosome 2, (2q33.1,) 191 kb [1, 5]. It encodes a transcription factor involved in craniofacial, central nervous system and skeletal development. SATB2 is also thought to play a role in bone remodeling [6-8]. SATB2 is a regulator of Osx which in turn, is responsible for the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts. Indeed, SATB2 plays a role at 2 levels firstly by blocking Hoxa2, which controls negatively the differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells to pro-osteoblasts and secondly by stimulating the differentiation of osteoblasts [9]. Several isolated clinical observations [10] have reported low bone mass, and/or bone fragility fracture in patients with SATB2 variants [4]. More recently, Zarate el al described low bone mass and early-onset fragility fractures in a retrospective series of 7 patients with SATB2 variants. In this series, elevated alkaline phosphatase levels were found in 5 individuals. To date, and to our knowledge, the characterization of skeletal involvement and of bone turnover markers in such patients has not yet been systematically collected in a prospective study. Moreover, the mechanism leading to early bone fragility is currently not completely understood. The aim of our study was to prospectively and systematically assess the skeletal manifestations observed in a cohort of 19 individuals with SAS, by the review of prevalent fractures and of skeletal X-rays. Patients underwent bone densitometry and had measurements of bone turnover markers as well as calcium and phosphate metabolism parameters.

Subjects and methods

We performed a non-interventional, multicenter cohort study, from 2017 to 2018. Patients were recruited and reviewed via the French Reference Center for Constitutional Bone Diseases (CRMR MOC).

Patients

19 patients with SATB2 pathogenic variants were included in the study. Consent was signed. Patient data were anonymized.

Data collected

The following data were collected for each patient: (1) Clinical data including age, gender, height, weight, medical history, history of fracture(s), vitamin D supplementation and other ongoing or past antiosteoporotic treatments. (2) Biological tests including serum total and ionized calcium, phosphorus, albumin, ionized calcium, 25 hydroxy-vitamin D, 1,25 dihydroxy-vitamin D, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH). Alkaline phosphatase levels (ALP), osteocalcin and serum procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were chosen to assess bone formation, and C-telopeptide (CTX) was chosen as a marker of bone resorption. Because normal reference range of these tests differ with patient age, and to compare the results between patients, results were displayed as an ULM, i.e. as the ratio of (patient value)/ (upper limit of normal range). Importantly, evaluation was performed in the absence of  recent fracture (< 1 year). Radiological evaluation was perfomed in the context of standard care evaluation of their skeletal dysplasia for all patients. They were reviewed by an experienced radiologist specialized in skeletal dysplasias from the CRMR—MOC. X-rays from spine, skull, long bones, and hands/feet were read independently of the clinical, biological and bone densitometry phenotype. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), total hip, and femoral neck using LUNAR or HOLOGIC equipment and software. Z-scores were used for data analysis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc Software (v11.6.1, MedCalc Software, Belgium) and Excel. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables, and numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Comparisons of subgroup characteristics were performed using Mann–Whitney test for unpaired data. Comparisons of proportions were performed using a chi-square test. Spearman’s rank correlation test was used to assess the relation between quantitative variables. For all analyses, a two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Data protection

The study received approval from the committee for the protection of persons (CPP) on the 19/09/2017, file No 2017-102169-44, Reference CPP: 3534-NI. Data collection was in accordance with CNIL regulations and in accordance with the Helsinki declaration.

Results

In all, 9 females (47%) and 10 males were included ranging in age from 2 to 19 years old. Extra skeletal features are summarized (Table 1). All mutations found were de novo, heterozygous and included partial or total deletion, missense and nonsense mutations (Table 2). None of our patients were taking medication.
Table 1

Extra skeletal features in the patients with SATB2 variants

PatientFeatures of Pierre Robin sequenceDental abnormalitiesBehavioral disordersIntellectual disabilitySpeech disordersSpeech delay
SATB2-01-P1YesHypodontiaNoYesYes
SATB2-01-P2NoMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P3NoMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P4NoMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P5NoMacrodontiaNoYesYes
SATB2-01-P6NoMacrodontiaNoYesYes
SATB2-01-P7YesMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P9NoMacrodontiaNoYesYes
SATB2-01-P10YesMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P11NoMacrodontiaNoYesYes
SATB2-01-P12YesMacrodontiaAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-01-P13YesYesNoYesYes
SATB2-02-P1NoHypondotiaNoYesYes
SATB2-04-P1YesYesYesYesYes
SATB2-05-P1NoYesNoYesYes
SATB2-06-P1NoYesAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-06-P2NoYesAutism spectrum disorderYesYes
SATB2-07-P1NoYesmildYesYes
SATB2-08-P1NoNoNoYesYes
Table 2

Clinical, molecular, biological and radiological details of the study

PatientGenderAge(y)Mutation(NM_015265.3)Clinical FractureRadiological fractureOther X-ray findingsLumbar SpineaBMDZ-score SD (g/cm2)Total hipaBMDZ-score SD (g/cm2)ALPULMCTX PlasmULMCa2.2–2.6 mmol/LPTH2nd generation Roche 10–47 pg/ml25 OH Vit D30–60 ng/ml
SATB2-01-P1Female11

c.1197dup

p.(Lys400*)

2

Humerus Clavicle

Thin Cranial vault with demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Spine demineralization with thick cortical bone

Delayed maturation

Small epiphyseal bones

Metaphyseal striations

Foliated cortical bone

− 3.5

(0.454)

− 2.7

(0.626)

NA0.782.274126
SATB2-01-P2Male10

c.1627del

p.(Arg543Alafs*3)

1

Humerus

Dorsal Vertebral fracture

Cranial vault with demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Small epiphyseal bones

Metaphyseal striations

Foliated cortical bone

− 1,1

(0.492)

− 0.9

(0.627)

0.860.792.523.224
SATB2-01-P3Male7Deletion exons 3 and 40Vertebral fracture

Thin cranial vault with demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

− 1,8

(0.443)

1.090.812.3150.421
SATB2-01-P4Female9

c.1165C > T

(pArg389Cys)

1

Tibia

Spine with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

− 1.7

(0.447)

− 1.8

(0.488)

1.050.782.4634.824
SATB2-01-P5Male11Deletion exons 3 and 4

1

Humerus

Vertebral fracture

Cranial vault demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Thin spine and long bone cortical

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

− 2.8

(0.409)

0.781.052.564.426
SATB2-01-P6Male7

c.703G > T

p.(Glu235*)

1

Clavicle

Vertebral fracture

Thin Cranial vault with demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Small ivory epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

− 0.9

(0.451)

0.800.812.5142.224
SATB2-01-P7Male12

del 2q33.1

(minimum size of 29.114 bp)

Deletion from 200,325,004 to 200,354,118 (GRCh37/hg19)

3

Vertebral fracture, thigh bone

Vertebral fracture

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Metaphyseal striations

− 2.0

(0,497)

0.68NA2.4328.319
SATB2-01-P9Male4

c.715C > T

p.(Arg239*)

0

Cranial vault demineralization

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

-2.6

(0,339)

0.780.892.4520.842
SATB2-01-P10Female14

c.955C > T

p.(Gln319*)

1

Forearm

Thin Cranial vault

Spine with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Foliated cortical bone

− 3.3

(0,746)

0.790.772.2468.230
SATB2-01-P11Male4

c.715C > T

p.(Arg239*)

0Cranial vault demineralization0.710.572.3332.844
SATB2-01-P12Male1

c.658C > T

p.(Gln220*)

0

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Skeletal maturation advance

Foliated cortical bone

0.990.732.4127.5
SATB2-01-P13Male6

del2q31.3

(7.78 Mb)

0

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

− 2.6

(0,445)

− 0.9

(0,667)

NANA31.225
SATB2-02-P1Female9

c.1198A > G

p.(Lys400Glu)

0Vertebral fracture

Cranial vault demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

0.5

(0,631)

− 1.1

(0,611)

1.27NA2.352135
SATB2-04-P1Female7

c.715C > T

p.(Arg239*)

0

Digitiform impressions

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Delayed maturation

Foliated cortical bone

1.12NA2.6820.112.5
SATB2-05-P1Female12

c.1285C > T

p.(Arg429*)

0

Cranial vault demineralization

Digitiform impressions

Spine with demineralization

Metaphyseal striations

− 2.3

(0,619)

− 2.7

(0,572)

0.511.2929.221
SATB2-06-P1Female13c.1696G > A p.(Glu566Lys)0

Thick Cranial vault with demineralization

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Skeletal maturation advance

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

0.230.192.4722.74
SATB2-06-P2Female8

c.1010 dup

p.(Phe339Alafs*13)

1

NA

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

1.330.872.262624
SATB2-07-P1Female10

c.1610del

p.(Asn537Thrfs*9)

1

Elbow

Cranial vault with demineralization

Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization

Metaphyseal striations

Small epiphyseal bones

Foliated cortical bone

1.07NA2.421937
SATB2-08-P1Male19c.1538G > A p.(Ser513Asn)0Thin spine cortical bone

− 0.2

(0,992)

− 0.4

(1,094)

0.620.742.43232.3

Bone densitometry results are expressed in g/cm2 and Z-score SD

NA not applicable, SD standard deviation

ALP alkaline phosphatase activity, CTX C-telopeptide, ULM upper limit method

Extra skeletal features in the patients with SATB2 variants Clinical, molecular, biological and radiological details of the study c.1197dup p.(Lys400*) 2 Humerus Clavicle Thin Cranial vault with demineralization Digitiform impressions Spine demineralization with thick cortical bone Delayed maturation Small epiphyseal bones Metaphyseal striations Foliated cortical bone − 3.5 (0.454) − 2.7 (0.626) c.1627del p.(Arg543Alafs*3) 1 Humerus Cranial vault with demineralization Digitiform impressions Small epiphyseal bones Metaphyseal striations Foliated cortical bone − 1,1 (0.492) − 0.9 (0.627) Thin cranial vault with demineralization Digitiform impressions Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 1,8 (0.443) c.1165C > T (pArg389Cys) 1 Tibia Spine with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 1.7 (0.447) − 1.8 (0.488) 1 Humerus Cranial vault demineralization Digitiform impressions Thin spine and long bone cortical Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 2.8 (0.409) c.703G > T p.(Glu235*) 1 Clavicle Thin Cranial vault with demineralization Digitiform impressions Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Small ivory epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 0.9 (0.451) del 2q33.1 (minimum size of 29.114 bp) Deletion from 200,325,004 to 200,354,118 (GRCh37/hg19) 3 Vertebral fracture, thigh bone Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Metaphyseal striations − 2.0 (0,497) c.715C > T p.(Arg239*) Cranial vault demineralization Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone -2.6 (0,339) c.955C > T p.(Gln319*) 1 Forearm Thin Cranial vault Spine with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Foliated cortical bone − 3.3 (0,746) c.715C > T p.(Arg239*) c.658C > T p.(Gln220*) Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Skeletal maturation advance Foliated cortical bone del2q31.3 (7.78 Mb) Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 2.6 (0,445) − 0.9 (0,667) c.1198A > G p.(Lys400Glu) Cranial vault demineralization Digitiform impressions Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone 0.5 (0,631) − 1.1 (0,611) c.715C > T p.(Arg239*) Digitiform impressions Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Delayed maturation Foliated cortical bone c.1285C > T p.(Arg429*) Cranial vault demineralization Digitiform impressions Spine with demineralization Metaphyseal striations − 2.3 (0,619) − 2.7 (0,572) Thick Cranial vault with demineralization Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Skeletal maturation advance Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones c.1010 dup p.(Phe339Alafs*13) 1 NA Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone c.1610del p.(Asn537Thrfs*9) 1 Elbow Cranial vault with demineralization Thin spine cortical bone with demineralization Metaphyseal striations Small epiphyseal bones Foliated cortical bone − 0.2 (0,992) − 0.4 (1,094) Bone densitometry results are expressed in g/cm2 and Z-score SD NA not applicable, SD standard deviation ALP alkaline phosphatase activity, CTX C-telopeptide, ULM upper limit method

Skeletal features (Table 2)

Nine/nineteen (47%) patients had at least one reported clinical fracture. Of these 9 patients with fractures, one had a history of known vertebral fracture and 8 patients had peripheral fractures. Two patients had a history of more than one fracture, one of whom presented with a long bone deformity, vertebral and hip fractures and another patient with fractures of the humerus and clavicle. One patient had tibial bowing. Although the exact circumstances of fracture occurrence were not always known, they usually occurred following minor trauma and therefore were considered to be non-traumatic. None of the patients were receiving or had received bisphosphonates before the discovery of fractures. Skeletal characteristics of the SATB2 cohort X Ray results as a percentage of a number of subjects. For DMO, results are given by the mean in g/cm2 and SD. For biological results, the mean of the measurements are given. For data whose reference ranges vary with age, we also calculated ULM (Upper Limit Method) *For normal range, please refer to Additional files. Reference values are presented by age and gender. Section headings are in bold

Skeletal evaluation

Calvaria (Table 3)

Demineralization was observed in 10/14 (71%) patients. Thin calvarial bone was observed in 4/14 (29%) patients, whereas a thick calvaria was observed in 1/14 (7%) patients. Digitiform impressions were present in 8/14 (57%) patients. Radiological features. A. Skull X Ray (9 years 3 months girl). Note the thin cranial vault, the demineralization and the digitiform Impressions. B. Spine X Ray (10 years boy). Note the demineralization, the vertebral fracture, and the thin cortical bone. C. Hand X-Ray (9 years 3 months girl). Note the demineralization, the delayed bone age (age 6 years 10 months), small epiphyse, and striated metaphyses

Spine (Fig. 1 and Tables 2, 3)

Vertebral compression fractures were detected in 6/17 (35%) patients. Skeletal demineralization (16/17, 94%) and cortical thinning of vertebrae (15/17, 88%) were the most frequent features at the spine. Cortical collapse was seen in 2/17 (12%) patients. Long bones (Fig. 1 and Tables 2, 3). Long bones were generally demineralized (18/19, 95%). The aspect of cortical bone was quite variable. No diaphyseal deformations or periosteal appositions were observed. A diaphyseal fracture of the femur was identified in one patient (5%). Cortical thickness was variable: normal (2/19, 11%), thick (7/19, 37%), and thin in 3/19 (16%) patients. Laminated bone cortex was frequently observed in 15/19 (79%).
Fig. 1

Radiological features. A. Skull X Ray (9 years 3 months girl). Note the thin cranial vault, the demineralization and the digitiform Impressions. B. Spine X Ray (10 years boy). Note the demineralization, the vertebral fracture, and the thin cortical bone. C. Hand X-Ray (9 years 3 months girl). Note the demineralization, the delayed bone age (age 6 years 10 months), small epiphyse, and striated metaphyses

Table 3

Skeletal characteristics of the SATB2 cohort

SATB2 cohort, 19 patients
Age (years ± SD)9.2 (1–19 years)
Female gender (N, %)9/19 (47%)
Clinically reported fractures (N, %)9/19 (47%)
Radiological fracture (N, %)
Fragility fracture (N, %)6/17 (35%)
Low bone mineral density at the lumber spine or total hip (N, %)
(Z-score ≤ − 2.0 SD)7/17 (41%)
Fragility fracture and/or Low bone mineral density
(Z-score ≤ − 2.0 SD) (N, %)11/17 (65%)
X-ray findings
Calvaria
Digitiformes Impressions (N, %)8/14 (57%)
Demineralization (N, %)10/14 (71%)
Spine
Vertebral compression fracture (N, %)6/17 (35%)
Cortical fine (N, %)15/17 (85%)
Demineralization (N, %)16/17 (94%)
Tubular bones
Demineralization (N, %)18/19 (95%)
Streak metaphysis (N, %)13/19 (68%)
Small epiphysis (N ,%)12/19 (63%)
Cortical foliated (N, %)15/19 (79%)
Cortical thick (N, %)7/19 (37%)
Hands
Distal phalanges shortened and widened (N, %)7/16 (43%)
aBMD
Lumbar spine Z-score (mean, SD)− 1.81 ± 1.26
Total hip Z-score (mean, SD)− 1.37 ± 0.94
Biochemical findings
Total Serum Calcium (2.20–2.60, mean, ± SD)2.41 ± 0.11
Serum Phosphate (mean, ± SD)1.55 ± 0.35
Ionized Calcium (1.1–1.3 mmol/L)1.24 ± 0.04
25 OH Vit D (30–60 ng/ml)27.2 ± 8.1 SD
1,25 OH Vit D (30–80 ng/l)64.96 ± 20.0 SD
ALP (UI/L)*366.89 ± 114 SD (0.86 ± 0.28 ULM)
Osteocalcin (microg/l)*92.40 (1.11 ULM)
P1NP (ng/ml)*964.21 (1.65 ULM)
CTX (pmol/l)*14221 (0.79 ULM)
PTH (10–50 pg/ml)34 (0.74 ULM)

X Ray results as a percentage of a number of subjects. For DMO, results are given by the mean in g/cm2 and SD. For biological results, the mean of the measurements are given. For data whose reference ranges vary with age, we also calculated ULM (Upper Limit Method)

*For normal range, please refer to Additional files. Reference values are presented by age and gender. Section headings are in bold

Bone maturation (Fig. 1 and Tables 2, 3)

Delayed ossification of carpal bones was noted in half of the patients aged 3 to 13 years-old (9/18, 50%), but 2 patients (11%) aged 6 years to 13 years presented with advanced ossification of the carpal bones. Long bone striations were found at the metaphysis in 14/19 (68%) of cases. Small epiphyses were noted in 12/19 (63%) of cases and ivories in 2/19 (11%) of the cases.

Distal bones (Fig. 1)

The distal phalanges were short, thick and abnormally shaped (7/16, 43%).

Bone densitometry (Tables 2, 3)

Bone densitometry was available for 13/19 patients. Among these patients, 7/13 (54%) patients had a Z-score of − 2.0 SD or lower (Z-score ≤ − 2 SD) at the lumber spine or the total hip, and 5 / 13 (38%) patients had a Z-score between − 1 and − 2 SD. Mean lumbar spine Z-score was—1.9 ± 1.1SD. Mean hip Z-score was − 1.5 ± 0.9 SD. Bone mineral density was in the normal range for 3 patients (7, 9 and 19 years old).

Prevalence of osteoporosis (Table 3)

Although only one patient reported a history of vertebral compression fracture, a total of 6 patients (35%) had at least one vertebral compression fracture on X-ray findings; and 11 patients (65%) had a fragility fracture and/or aBMD Z-score ≤ -2 SD. The prevalence of osteoporosis defined by at least one vertebral compression fracture, or by the presence of both a clinically significant fracture history and a BMD Z-score ≤ -2.0 DS, was of 8/17 (47%).

Biological evaluation (Tables 2, 3 and Additional file: Tables)

Serum total calcium, ionized calcium and serum phosphate were in the normal range in all patients. 25 OH Vitamin D value was below 30 ng/ml in 12/18 patients (66.7%), with a mean value of 27.2 ± SD 8.12 ng /mL. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was above normal in 3 patients and in the normal range in most patients: 34.0 ± SD 14.42 pg/ml, min 19.0, max 68.2 (10–50 pg/ml), ie 0.74 ULM (Upper Limit Multiple) [11]. CTX levels were in the upper normal values when using reference range values adapted to the patient age: 14.221 ± SD 435 pmol / L, min 3364, max 18.832, (7.000–18.000 pmol / L), ie 0.79 ULM. Alkaline phosphatases (ALP) were above normal values in 10/17 patients (59%). Among patients with increased ALP values, 7/10 (70%) had a history of fractures but 30% had no history of clinical or radiological fracture. Osteocalcin and P1NP were both above normal values: 92.4 ± SD 34.7 microg / L, min 43.9, max 147 (38–83 microg / L), ie 1.11 ULM and 964.2 ± 381.8 ng / ml standard function of age, 1.65 ULM, respectively. Correlation between BMD and biological parameters R = 0.334 P = 0.665 R = 0.933 = 0.0204 R = − 0.008 P = 0.9792 R = 0.967 = 0.0331 R = 0.779 P = 0.0676 R = 0.687 = 0.0066 R = − 0.302 P = 0.4289 R = 0.254 P = 0.4793 R = 0.448 P = 0.1251 R = 0.387 P = 0.2141 R = 0.967 = 0.0331 R = 0.678 = 0.0077 R = 0.549 = 0.0421 R = − 0.475 P = 0.1649 R = − 0.616 = 0.0331 R = 0.044 P = 0.8759 R = 0.061 P = 0.8346 R = 0.779 P = 0.0676 R = 0.678 = 0.0077 R = 0.315 P = 0.2525 R = − 0.950 = 0.0132 R = 0.585 P = 0.0588 R = 0.847 = 0.0001 R = − 0.141 P = 0.6466 R = 0.687 = 0.0066 R = 0.549 = 0.0421 R = 0.268 P = 0.3349 Note that hip BMD is positively correlated with albuminemia and spine BMD, whereas it is negatively correlated with bone formation parameters osteocalcin and P1NP, and phosphate levels. Spine BMD is positively correlated with ionized calcium and ALP, and negatively correlated with osteocalcin. CTX is positively correlated with osteocalcin and ALP. Osteocalcin is positively correlated with CTX and negatively with spine BMD. P1NP is positively correlated with ALP. BMD is negatively correlated with markers of bone formation. Significant correlations are in bold

Biochemical parameters and bone mineral density correlations (Table 4)

We next assessed whether bone mass was correlated with biochemical parameters. Hip BMD was positively correlated with spine BMD. Markers of bone formation (ALP and osteocalcin) were positively correlated with resorption markers (CTX) suggesting bone coupling between bone formation and bone resorption in patients with SAS. Bone formation marker ALP was positively correlated with P1NP and tended to be correlated with osteocalcin (p = 0.0676).

Comparison of fractured with non-fractured SATB2 patients

ALP, assessed using the ULM levels, were significantly higher in individuals with pathogenic variants in SATB2 with a history of fracture compared to non-fractured patients (p = 0.01).

Discussion

We report here the investigation of skeletal manifestations in a cohort of patients with SATB2 variants. The SAS clinical spectrum described so far, has mainly focused on teeth abnormalities, developmental delay, speech limitations and behavioral issues. The aim of the study was to highlight the skeletal phenotype pertaining to premature osteoporosis. Indeed, we observed a particularly high frequency of fractures and low bone mass in these patients with 35% of radiologic vertebral compression fractures. Importantly, the frequency of vertebral compression fractures was very much underestimated with only one patient reporting vertebral fracture whereas 6/17 (35%) patients displayed radiographic vertebral fractures. Additionally, 54% of patients showed evidence of low bone mass as defined by a Z-score below − 2 SD. Furthermore, the extensive radiological assessment of this cohort allows the description of unreported skeletal features including thin cortical bone, dysmorphic phalanges, and delayed carpal ossification. The systematic biochemical assessment, performed independently of any fracture event, led to the observation of increased ALP levels in more than half the cohort (59%), using age adjusted reference range, as well as increased osteocalcin and P1NP levels, all known markers of bone formation. These findings support that the abnormalities in bone formation markers are the result of the underlying bone disease rather than related to a fracture event. We also observed a correlation between P1NP and ALP levels, in accordance with the increase in bone formation markers. These findings are consistent with previous report of increased ALP and/or P1NP and and/or osteocalcin in a very limited number of patients with SAS [1, 9]. Finally, we also found increased CTX levels, which were correlated with increased bone formation markers, supporting increased bone turnover in these patients [1]. The exact mechanism contributing to the skeletal phenotype remains incompletely understood. Bone formation markers are the products of active osteoblasts expressed during different phases of their development and considered to reflect different aspects of osteoblast function and bone formation. SATB2 regulates skeletogenesis by modulating the expression of osteoblast specific genes like SOX9, ATF4 or RUNX2, and plays a role in the differentiation of osteoblasts [9]. Moreover, it has been also demonstrated that mutations in SATB2 reduce pre-osteoblast formation supporting that SATB2 also regulates progenitor proliferation and participates in both proliferation and differentiation processes [12]. Although this study has limitations, including the small size of the cohort, and the difficulties in the interpretation of the bone markers values in children, related to age variability, it clearly highlights the broad spectrum of skeletal abnormalities, fractures and low bone mass in individuals with SAS. This study also supports the need for regular assessment of BMD and bone turnover markers in the management of patients with SATB2 pathogenic variants. While none of the individuals reported here had any specific treatment apart from vitamin D supplementation, the role of SATB2 in osteoblast differentiation and proliferation may also suggest the use of anabolic agent targeting osteoblast. For this reason, we did not introduce bisphosphonates in this cohort. Furthermore, detecting any additional risk factor for osteoporosis and/or fractures, including vitamin D insufficiency, may help to prevent fractures in this context. Additional file 1. References for normal biological values for children and adults. Additional file 2. Raw data and ULM values for P1NP and Osteocalcin in the 19 patients.
Table 4

Correlation between BMD and biological parameters

Hip BMD Z-scoreSpine BMD Z-scorePhosphateIonized calciumALPCTXOsteocalcinP1NP
ALP

R = 0.334

P = 0.665

R = 0.933

P  = 0.0204

R = − 0.008

P = 0.9792

R = 0.967

P  = 0.0331

R = 0.779

P = 0.0676

R = 0.687

P  = 0.0066

CTX

R = − 0.302

P = 0.4289

R = 0.254

P = 0.4793

R = 0.448

P = 0.1251

R = 0.387

P = 0.2141

R = 0.967

P  = 0.0331

R = 0.678

P  = 0.0077

R = 0.549

P  = 0.0421

Osteocalcin

R = − 0.475

P = 0.1649

R = − 0.616

P  = 0.0331

R = 0.044

P = 0.8759

R = 0.061

P = 0.8346

R = 0.779

P = 0.0676

R = 0.678

P  = 0.0077

R = 0.315

P = 0.2525

P1NP

R = − 0.950

P  = 0.0132

R = 0.585

P = 0.0588

R = 0.847

P  = 0.0001

R = − 0.141

P = 0.6466

R = 0.687

P  = 0.0066

R = 0.549

P  = 0.0421

R = 0.268

P = 0.3349

Note that hip BMD is positively correlated with albuminemia and spine BMD, whereas it is negatively correlated with bone formation parameters osteocalcin and P1NP, and phosphate levels. Spine BMD is positively correlated with ionized calcium and ALP, and negatively correlated with osteocalcin. CTX is positively correlated with osteocalcin and ALP. Osteocalcin is positively correlated with CTX and negatively with spine BMD. P1NP is positively correlated with ALP. BMD is negatively correlated with markers of bone formation. Significant correlations are in bold

  12 in total

1.  SATB2 is a multifunctional determinant of craniofacial patterning and osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Gergana Dobreva; Maria Chahrour; Marcel Dautzenberg; Laura Chirivella; Benoit Kanzler; Isabel Fariñas; Gerard Karsenty; Rudolf Grosschedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Satb2 regulates proliferation and nuclear integrity of pre-osteoblasts.

Authors:  Todd Dowrey; Evelyn E Schwager; Julieann Duong; Fjodor Merkuri; Yuri A Zarate; Jennifer L Fish
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of osteoblast-specific transcription factor Osterix effect on bone formation.

Authors:  Chi Zhang
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2012-10-18

4.  Increased bone turnover, osteoporosis, progressive tibial bowing, fractures, and scoliosis in a patient with a final-exon SATB2 frameshift mutation.

Authors:  Philip M Boone; Yiu Man Chan; Jill V Hunter; Louis E Pottkotter; Nelson A Davino; Yaping Yang; Joke Beuten; Carlos A Bacino
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Heterozygous nonsense mutation SATB2 associated with cleft palate, osteoporosis, and cognitive defects.

Authors:  Petcharat Leoyklang; Kanya Suphapeetiporn; Pichit Siriwan; Tayard Desudchit; Pattraporn Chaowanapanja; William A Gahl; Vorasuk Shotelersuk
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 6.  Bone health and SATB2-associated syndrome.

Authors:  Y A Zarate; M Steinraths; A Matthews; W E Smith; A Sun; L C Wilson; C Brain; J Allgove; B Jacobs; J L Fish; C M Powell; W W Wasserman; C D van Karnebeek; E L Wakeling; N S Ma
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Natural history and genotype-phenotype correlations in 72 individuals with SATB2-associated syndrome.

Authors:  Yuri A Zarate; Constance L Smith-Hicks; Carol Greene; Mary-Alice Abbott; Victoria M Siu; Amy R U L Calhoun; Arti Pandya; Chumei Li; Elizabeth A Sellars; Julie Kaylor; Katherine Bosanko; Louisa Kalsner; Alice Basinger; Anne M Slavotinek; Hazel Perry; Margarita Saenz; Marta Szybowska; Louise C Wilson; Ajith Kumar; Caroline Brain; Meena Balasubramanian; Holly Dubbs; Xilma R Ortiz-Gonzalez; Elaine Zackai; Quinn Stein; Cynthia M Powell; Samantha Schrier Vergano; Allison Britt; Angela Sun; Wendy Smith; E Martina Bebin; Jonathan Picker; Amelia Kirby; Hailey Pinz; Hannah Bombei; Sonal Mahida; Julie S Cohen; Ali Fatemi; Hilary J Vernon; Rebecca McClellan; Leah R Fleming; Brittney Knyszek; Michelle Steinraths; Cruz Velasco Gonzalez; Anita E Beck; Katie L Golden-Grant; Alena Egense; Aditi Parikh; Chantalle Raimondi; Brad Angle; William Allen; Suzanna Schott; Adi Algrabli; Nathaniel H Robin; Joseph W Ray; David B Everman; Michael J Gambello; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Further supporting evidence for the SATB2-associated syndrome found through whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Yuri A Zarate; Hazel Perry; Tawfeg Ben-Omran; Elizabeth A Sellars; Quinn Stein; Mariam Almureikhi; Kirk Simmons; Ophir Klein; Jennifer Fish; Murray Feingold; Jessica Douglas; Michael C Kruer; Yue Si; Rong Mao; Dianalee McKnight; Federica Gibellini; Kyle Retterer; Anne Slavotinek
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Are laboratory parameter (biomarker) values similar to the healthy volunteer reference range in all patient populations?

Authors:  David A Brott; Michael J Goodman; Richard P Hermann; Michael Merz; Roser Calvo; Nadereh Poorkhalkali; Alexandre Kiazand
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Integrating Epigenomic Elements and GWASs Identifies BDNF Gene Affecting Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Shan-Shan Dong; Xiao-Feng Chen; Ying-Aisha Jing; Man Yang; Han Yan; Hui Shen; Xiang-Ding Chen; Li-Jun Tan; Qing Tian; Hong-Wen Deng; Tie-Lin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.