| Literature DB >> 35241008 |
Ewa Zalewska1, Sonia Kaniuka-Jakubowska2, Piotr Wiśniewski2, Magdalena Jankowska3, Krzysztof Sworczak2, Alicja Dębska-Ślizień3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary kidney disease. Defect in cilia-mediated signaling activity is a crucial factor leading to cyst formation. Hence, ADPKD is regarded as a systemic disorder with multiple extrarenal complications, including cysts in other organs, for instance, the liver, pancreas, spleen, or ovaries. Interestingly, loss-of-function of primary cilia has been recently found to contribute to a malignant transformation from degenerated thyroid follicles. However, the increased incidence of thyroid nodules in ADPKD patients has not yet been fully confirmed.Entities:
Keywords: ADPKD; Polycystic kidney disease; Thyroid nodules; Ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35241008 PMCID: PMC8892779 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02714-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
The clinical characteristics, laboratory values, and thyroid ultrasound results of our cohort
| Patient number | 49 |
|---|---|
| Male/female | 9/40 |
| Age [years] – mean (SD) | 36.7 ± 11.9 |
| Number of patients with solid thyroid nodules | 6 |
| Number of patients with cystic-solid thyroid nodules | 7 |
| Number of patients with cystic lesions | 10 |
| Number of patients after thyroidectomy due to nodular goiter | 2 |
| Number of patients with Hashimoto disease | 1 |
| Number of patients with thyrotoxicosis | 1 |
| Serum creatinine concentration [mg/dl] - median (Q – Q3) | 0.82 (0.68 – 0.96) |
| eGFR [ml/min/1.73 m2] - mean (SD) | 100 ± 22 |
| TSH [mlU/l] - mean (SD) | 1.2 ± 0.64 |
| Ft3 [pmol/l] - median (Q – Q3) | 4.2 (3.78 – 4.66) |
| Ft4 [pmol/l] - median (Q – Q3) | 12.6 (11.6 – 13.8) |
| Number of TgAb-positive patients | 21 |
| Number of TPOAb -positive patients | 8 |
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, fT3 triiodothyronine, fT4 thyroxine, (Q1 – Q3) quartile range, SD standard deviation, TgAb thyroglobulin antibodies, TPOAb anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone
Comparison of thyroid ultrasound results and clinical characteristics of ADPKD patients in our cohort according to gender
| Age [years] – mean (SD) | 35.6 ± 10.6 | 41.6 ±16.7 | 0.333 |
| V of TG [ml] - mean (SD) | 10.1 ± 2.64 | 16.9 ± 8.43 | 0.057 |
| n with TN (% | 18 (45%) | 6 (67%) | 0.289 |
| Mean V of TN [ml] - median (Q – Q3) | 0.0122 (0.005-0.145) | 0.08 (0.052-0.156) | 0.386 |
P-values were calculated using independent-sample t-test in the case of normal distribution and Mann-Whitney U in case of non-normal distribution. For categorical data, the Fisher test was used due to the small sample size. n number of patients, SD standard deviation, V volume, TG thyroid gland, TN thyroid nodules, (Q1 – Q3) quartile range
Comparison results of the number of thyroid nodules and mean volume of thyroid nodules of patients with polycystic liver disease or not and according to the kidney size above 16,5 cm (rapid progressors) or below 16,5 cm (slow progressors)
| n with TN (%) | 15 (48%) | 9 (50%) | 1 |
| Mean V of TN [ml] - median (Q – Q3) | 0.047 (0.006 – 0.15) | 0.024 (0.009 - 0.143) | 0.765 |
( | ( | ||
| n with TN (%) | 10 (50%) | 14 (48%) | 1 |
| Mean V of TN [ml] - median (Q – Q3) | 0.014 (0.007 – 0.085) | 0.052 (0.009 – 0.155) | 0.478 |
P-values were calculated using independent-sample t-test in the case of normal distribution and Mann-Whitney U in case of non-normal distribution. For categorical data, the chi-square test with Yates’s correction was used. n number of patients, SD standard deviation, V volume, TG thyroid gland, TN thyroid nodules, (Q1 – Q3) quartile range
The comparison of our patients and cohort from the Karaszewski et al. population study [14]. For the comparison, we excluded from our cohort four patients with a history of thyroid disease
| Sex ratio (female/male) | 37/8 | 95/40 | 0.173a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years] – mean (SD) | f1 | m1 | f2 | m2 | f1 vs. f2 | m1 vs. m2 |
| V of TG [ml] – mean (SD) | f1 10.2 ± 2.67 | m1 16.9 ± 8.43 | f2 15.67 ± 7.26 | m2 22.31 ± 13.03 | f1 vs. f2 0.000 | m1 vs. m2 0.124 |
| TSH [mlU/l] – mean (SD) | f1 1.27 ± 0.648 | m1 0.94 ± 0.557 | f2 1.87 ± 1.39 | m2 1.55 ± 0.83 | f1 vs. f2 0.000 | m1 vs. m2 0.054 |
| n w/ TN (%) | 11 (22%) | 32 (23.7 %) | 1 | |||
| n w/ MTN (%) | 6 (12%) | 16 (12 %) | 1 | |||
| Mean V of TN [ml] - median (Q – Q3) | 0.141 (0.08 – 0.156) | 0.67 | 0.0039 | |||
P-values for our cohort versus cohort from population study are calculated using independent-sample t-test in case of normal distribution, Mann-Whitney U in case of non-normal distribution, and chi-square test with Yates’s correction in case of categorical data. n number of patients, SD standard deviation, TG thyroid gland, f1 female patients from our cohort, f2 female subjects form Karaszewski et al. study, m1 male patients from our cohort, m2 male subjects form Karaszewski et al. study, f1 vs. f2 the comparison of the groups of women, m1 vs. m2 the comparison of the groups of men, V volume, TN thyroid nodules, MTN multiple thyroid nodules, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone. athe comparison of the sex ratio in both cohorts