Mehmet Emin Kaval1, Gözde Kandemir Demirci2, Alp Abidin Atesci3, Fırat Sarsar4, Furkan Dindaroğlu5, Pelin Güneri6, Mehmet Kemal Caliskan2. 1. Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey. Electronic address: mehmetkaval@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Endodontology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey. 3. Private Practice, Turkey. 4. Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Faculty of Education, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. 5. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are one of the most important developments in dental practice, and in the era of Covid 19 pandemic, audio-visual contents of YouTube™ could be an information source for dental students, practitioners and patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, content and the demographics of YouTube™ videos about REPs. METHODS: A search on YouTube™ was performed for REPs using "endodontic regeneration", "pulp regeneration", "regenerative endodontics", "regenerative endodontic procedures", "revascularization" and "revitalization" keywords. Totally 531 videos were found and 60 videos met the inclusion criteria. Following the assessment of the demographic features of the videos and the viewing rate of the videos were calculated. The content of the videos was evaluated based on the selected headings. The quality of the videos was assessed using the video information, quality index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS) and DISCERN. The statistical analysis was performed using Spearman Correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Majority of the videos about REPs were created by dental professionals (91.7%). The most commonly covered topic was "clinical application" (76.7%). Total content score showed a positive correlation with total VIQI (r = 0.795; p < 0.001) and GQS (r = 0.952; p < 0.001). There were significant relationships between total content score, duration, GQS, total VIQI score and DISCERN. CONCLUSION: The findings revealed that YouTube™ videos about REPs provide predominantly clinical information about patient chairside practice of REPs and they could be considered as a supplementary information source for dental students and practitioners.
BACKGROUND: Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) are one of the most important developments in dental practice, and in the era of Covid 19 pandemic, audio-visual contents of YouTube™ could be an information source for dental students, practitioners and patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, content and the demographics of YouTube™ videos about REPs. METHODS: A search on YouTube™ was performed for REPs using "endodontic regeneration", "pulp regeneration", "regenerative endodontics", "regenerative endodontic procedures", "revascularization" and "revitalization" keywords. Totally 531 videos were found and 60 videos met the inclusion criteria. Following the assessment of the demographic features of the videos and the viewing rate of the videos were calculated. The content of the videos was evaluated based on the selected headings. The quality of the videos was assessed using the video information, quality index (VIQI), Global Quality Score (GQS) and DISCERN. The statistical analysis was performed using Spearman Correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Majority of the videos about REPs were created by dental professionals (91.7%). The most commonly covered topic was "clinical application" (76.7%). Total content score showed a positive correlation with total VIQI (r = 0.795; p < 0.001) and GQS (r = 0.952; p < 0.001). There were significant relationships between total content score, duration, GQS, total VIQI score and DISCERN. CONCLUSION: The findings revealed that YouTube™ videos about REPs provide predominantly clinical information about patient chairside practice of REPs and they could be considered as a supplementary information source for dental students and practitioners.
Authors: Xiang Zhang; Yi Yang; Yi-Wei Shen; Ke-Rui Zhang; Li-Tai Ma; Chen Ding; Bei-Yu Wang; Yang Meng; Hao Liu Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-09-21