Literature DB >> 35239738

"It just seemed like a perfect storm": A multi-methods feasibility study on the use of Facebook, Google Ads, and Reddit to collect data on abortion-seeking experiences from people who considered but did not obtain abortion care in the United States.

Heidi Moseson1, Jane W Seymour2, Carmela Zuniga2, Alexandra Wollum1, Anna Katz1, Terri-Ann Thompson2, Caitlin Gerdts1.   

Abstract

Most studies of abortion access have recruited participants from abortion clinics, thereby missing people for whom barriers to care were insurmountable. Consequently, research may underestimate the nature and scope of barriers that exist. We aimed to recruit participants who had considered, but failed to obtain, an abortion using three online platforms, and to evaluate the feasibility of collecting data on their abortion-seeking experiences in a multi-modal online study. In 2018, we recruited participants for this feasibility study from Facebook, Google Ads, and Reddit for an online survey about experiences seeking abortion care in the United States; we additionally conducted in-depth interviews among a subset of survey participants. We completed descriptive analyses of survey data, and thematic analyses of interview data. Recruitment results have been previously published. For the primary outcomes of this analysis, over one month, we succeeded in capturing data on abortion-seeking experiences from 66 individuals who were not currently pregnant and reported not having obtained an abortion, nor visited an abortion facility, despite feeling that abortion could have been the best option for a recent pregnancy. A subset of survey respondents (n = 14) completed in-depth interviews. Results highlighted multiple, reinforcing barriers to abortion care, including legal restrictions such as gestational limits and waiting periods that exacerbated financial and other burdens, logistical and informational barriers, as well as barriers to abortion care less frequently reported in the literature, such as a preference for medication abortion. These findings support the use of online recruitment to identify and survey an understudied population about their abortion-seeking experiences. Further, findings contribute to a more complete understanding of the full range of barriers to abortion care that people experience in the United States, and how these barriers intersect to not just delay, but to prevent people from obtaining abortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35239738      PMCID: PMC8893629          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  25 in total

1.  Stability of Retrospective Pregnancy Intention Reporting Among Women with Unwanted Pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Mark R Wilson; Minjeong Jeon; Diana G Foster
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

2.  Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah C M Roberts; Heather Gould; Katrina Kimport; Tracy A Weitz; Diana Greene Foster
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

3.  State abortion policies and Medicaid coverage of abortion are associated with pregnancy outcomes among individuals seeking abortion recruited using Google Ads: A national cohort study.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Ashley A McCook; Ariana H Bennett; Alice F Cartwright; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Experiences Accessing Abortion Care in Alabama among Women Traveling for Services.

Authors:  Kari White; Victoria deMartelly; Daniel Grossman; Janet M Turan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  "It's not something you talk about really": information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Jenna Jerman; Lori Frohwirth
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Liza Fuentes; Sharon Lebenkoff; Kari White; Caitlin Gerdts; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.

Authors:  Caitlin Gerdts; Liza Fuentes; Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Brianna Keefe-Oates; Sarah E Baum; Kristine Hopkins; Chandler W Stolp; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.561

8.  Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan M Bearak; Kristen Lagasse Burke; Rachel K Jones
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-10-03

Review 9.  Comparison of study samples recruited with virtual versus traditional recruitment methods.

Authors:  Heidi Moseson; Shefali Kumar; Jessie L Juusola
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-06-17

10.  Using Google Ads to recruit and retain a cohort considering abortion in the United States.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Iris J Jovel; Kevin D McCuaig; Alice F Cartwright
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2019-11-28
View more
  1 in total

1.  Abortion beyond 13 weeks in Argentina: healthcare seeking experiences during self-managed abortion accompanied by the Socorristas en Red.

Authors:  Brianna Keefe-Oates; Chelsea G Tejada; Ruth Zurbriggen; Belén Grosso; Caitlin Gerdts
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.