| Literature DB >> 35239696 |
Borui Yan1, Qianli Dong1, Qian Li1, Lei Yang2, Fahim U I Amin1.
Abstract
Studying the linkage between manufacturing industry and logistics industry is conducive to explore and improve the efficiency of the common development of them. In order to study the interaction of logistics industry on the development of manufacturing industry and the development of two-industry-linkage, it first calculates the high-quality development level of logistics industry and manufacturing industry, then uses the coupling coordination model to theoretically analyze and empirically test the coupling and coordinated development level of high-quality development of logistics industry and manufacturing industry from three aspects: coupling degree, coordination degree and coupling coordination degree, and based on the perspective of integration field theory, it takes the three basic synthetic fields of logistics integrator, logistics base-nuclear and logistics connection-key as the analysis dimension, PVAR model was introduced for in-depth analysis the impact of logistics industry on manufacturing industry and the level of the two-industry-linkage. It was found that the high-quality development of China's logistics industry and manufacturing industry is close on the whole, and the development trend is consistent, the high-quality development of them is mainly caused by the change of scale, but there is no obvious change in technical efficiency, which also provides a way for the high-quality development of the two-industry-linkage in the future. The two-industry-linkage mostly belongs to the situation of low-level mutual restriction, which has not yet reached a high level of mutual promotion, resulting in the overall coupling coordination degree basically in a state of barely coordination. The development of logistics industry and manufacturing industry need to go through certain practice and running in, when there is an error matching between the two, the logistics industry will inhibit the two-industry-linkage. When the economy develops to a certain extent, the expansion of the logistics system scale to the level of the two-industry-linkage is not necessarily beneficial, blindly exceeding the demand for logistics investment will cause a waste of resources, which is not conducive to the high-quality development of the logistics industry and the coupling and coordinated development of the two industries. In the long run, the change of the logistics basic-nuclear capacity, the logistics integrator scale and logistics connection-key level will have a positive impact on the change of green total factor productivity in manufacturing industry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35239696 PMCID: PMC8893707 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The logic framework diagram.
Classification standard of coupling coordination degree.
| D-value interval of coupling coordination degree | Coordination level | Coupling coordination degree |
|---|---|---|
| (0.0~0.1) | 1 | Extreme disorder |
| [0.1~0.2) | 2 | Severe disorder |
| [0.2~0.3) | 3 | Moderate disorder |
| [0.3~0.4) | 4 | Mild disorder |
| [0.4~0.5) | 5 | Verge of disorder |
| [0.5~0.6) | 6 | Reluctantly coordination |
| [0.6~0.7) | 7 | Primary coordination |
| [0.7~0.8) | 8 | Intermediate coordination |
| [0.8~0.9) | 9 | Good coordination |
| [0.9~1.0) | 10 | High quality coordination |
PVAR model index description.
| Indexes | Variable symbol | Index measurement | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry | gyzhxl | Comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry | - |
| Change rate of green total factor productivity in manufacturing industry | gymi | Manufacturing industrial MI | - |
| Comprehensive technical efficiency of logistics industry | wlzhxl | Comprehensive technical efficiency of logistics industry | - |
| Change rate of logistics green total factor productivity | wlmi | Logistics industry MI | - |
| Efficiency of the two-industry-linkage | wgd | Coupling coordination degree of manufacturing industry and logistics industry | - |
| Capability of logistics base-nuclear | zzl | Freight turnover | 100 million ton km |
| Scale of logistics integrator | wlry | Number of logistics industry employees | ten thousand people |
| Level of logistics connection-key | djglmd | Density of grade highway network | km / km2 |
Descriptive statistics of core variables.
| Dimension | Variables | Sample Size | Min | Max | Mean | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistics industry investment | Fixed asset investment in logistics industry | 570 | 29.990 | 3364.121 | 644.115 | 608.479 |
| Number of logistics industry employees | 570 | 2.800 | 86.400 | 23.546 | 14.244 | |
| Energy consumption of logistics industry | 570 | 23.913 | 3559.573 | 848.715 | 641.550 | |
| Logistics output | Added value of logistics industry | 570 | 19.500 | 3776.720 | 705.750 | 649.720 |
| Carbon emission of logistics industry | 570 | 0.500 | 70.545 | 16.452 | 12.699 | |
| Manufacturing investment | Net value of fixed assets of manufacturing industry | 570 | 182.010 | 26933.180 | 5130.682 | 4583.304 |
| Number of manufacturing industry employees | 570 | 9.700 | 1568.000 | 277.569 | 302.670 | |
| Energy consumption of manufacturing industry | 570 | 168.166 | 23332.300 | 5867.241 | 4474.654 | |
| Manufacturing output | Added value of manufacturing industry | 570 | 58.000 | 36973.730 | 4621.348 | 5682.248 |
| Carbon emissions of manufacturing industry | 570 | 5.300 | 1038.870 | 217.133 | 172.603 | |
| Capability of logistics base-nuclear | Freight turnover | 570 | 97.5 | 30324.9 | 4043.584 | 4645.409 |
| Scale of logistics integrator | Number of logistics industry employees | 570 | 2.8 | 86.4 | 23.546 | 14.244 |
| Level of logistics connection-key | Density of grade highway network | 570 | 0.024 | 2.098 | 0.667 | 0.476 |
Description of unit root test results of variables.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lngyzhxl | HT | 0.5831 | 0.0685 | stable |
| IPS | -3.6682 | 0.0001 | stable | |
| lnzzl | HT | 0.5169 | 0.0007 | stable |
| IPS | -1.3768 | 0.0843 | stable | |
| lnwlry | HT | 0.5913 | 0.0998 | stable |
| IPS | -4.4015 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| lndjglmd | HT | 0.7002 | 0.9231 | unstable |
| IPS | -1.8715 | 0.0306 | stable |
Unit root test results of variables first-order difference sequences.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d_lngyzhxl | HT | -0.1288 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.6494 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnzzl | HT | -0.1739 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.3001 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnwlry | HT | -0.0154 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.6296 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lndjglmd | HT | 0.1008 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.7387 | 0.0000 | stable |
Cointegration test of logistics industry and the comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry.
| Inspection method | Index | Statistic | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kao test | Modified Dickey-Fuller t | -1.4045 | 0.0801 |
| Dickey-Fuller t | -2.5462 | 0.0054 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -0.2759 | 0.3913 | |
| Unadjusted modified Dickey Fuller t | -1.3389 | 0.0903 | |
| Unadjusted Dickey-Fuller t | -2.5095 | 0.0060 | |
| Pedroni test | Modified Phillips-Perron t | 2.0920 | 0.0182 |
| Phillips-Perron t | -6.0233 | 0.0000 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -5.2765 | 0.0000 | |
| Westerlund test | Variance ratio | -1.9856 | 0.0235 |
Lag test of PVAR model for logistics industry and the comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry.
| lag | AIC | BIC | HQIC |
| 1 | -5.17878 | -3.99621 | -4.71394 |
| 2 | -5.39372 | -4.00571 | -4.84665 |
| 3 | -5.32685 | -3.71075 | -4.68809 |
| 4 | -5.17897 | -3.30776 | -4.43721 |
| 5 | -6.89553* | -4.73658* | -6.03709* |
GMM estimation results of PVAR model for logistics industry and the comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry.
| h_d_lngyzhxl | h_d_lnzzl | h_d_lnwlry | h_d_lndjglmd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.h_d_lngyzhxl | -0.1319 | 0.0205 | 0.0223 | 0.0597 |
| L.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0164 | -0.1415 | 0.0540 | 0.005 |
| L.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0281 | -0.0733 | -0.0057 | -0.0126 |
| L.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0215 | 0.1950 | 0.0155 | 0.1493 |
| L2.h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.1071 | 0.0514 | -0.047 | 0.0647 |
| L2.h_d_lnzzl | -0.029 | 0.0602 | 0.0376 | 0.0233 |
| L2.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0159 | -0.3171 | 0.0275 | 0.0016 |
| L2.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0394 | 0.6117 | -0.0687 | 0.0640 |
| L3.h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.063 | 0.2780 | -0.2345 | 0.0832 |
| L3.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0172 | 0.0051 | 0.0822 | 0.0210 |
| L3.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0433 | -0.0443 | 0.0433 | -0.0047 |
| L3.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0288 | -0.0096 | -0.0640 | 0.0295 |
| L4.h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.0861 | 0.1076 | 0.0094 | 0.0876 |
| L4.h_d_lnzzl | 0.008 | 0.0129 | 0.0396 | 0.0314 |
| L4.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0707 | 0.0764 | 0.0698 | -0.0734 |
| L4.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0953 | 0.1284 | -0.0178 | -0.0391 |
| L5.h_d_lngyzhxl | -0.0394 | -0.0938 | 0.0389 | -0.0155 |
| L5.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0121 | 0.2305 | 0.1346 | 0.0200 |
| L5.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0384 | 0.014 | 0.0034 | -0.023 |
| L5.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0085 | 0.1585 | -0.0096 | -0.0013 |
Note
* ** *** represents the significance levels of 10%,5% and 1% respectively.
where, h_ represents the variable after eliminating the fixed effect by Helmert transform; L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 indicate lag first order to lag fifth order.
Granger causality test of logistics industry and the comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry.
| Original hypothesis: the latter is not the Granger reason of the former | p-value | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h_d_lngyzhxl | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.920 | supported |
| h_d_lngyzhxl | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.383 | supported |
| h_d_lngyzhxl | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.206 | supported |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.164 | supported |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.056 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.000 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.007 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.000 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.067 | rejected |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lngyzhxl | 0.003 | rejected |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.012 | rejected |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.034 | rejected |
Fig 2Impulse response diagram of coupling and coordinated development of two industries.
Variance decomposition of logistics industry and the comprehensive technical efficiency of manufacturing industry.
| Variables | Phase | d_lngyzhxl | d_lnzzl | d_lnwlry | d_lndjglmd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d_lngyzhxl | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 2 | 0.998 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 3 | 0.994 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 4 | 0.991 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 5 | 0.983 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 10 | 0.978 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 15 | 0.977 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 20 | 0.977 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 25 | 0.977 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| d_lngyzhxl | 30 | 0.977 | 0.011 | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| d_lnzzl | 1 | 0.048 | 0.952 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| d_lnzzl | 2 | 0.048 | 0.949 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| d_lnzzl | 3 | 0.046 | 0.912 | 0.019 | 0.024 |
| d_lnzzl | 4 | 0.064 | 0.894 | 0.019 | 0.023 |
| d_lnzzl | 5 | 0.066 | 0.889 | 0.019 | 0.026 |
| d_lnzzl | 10 | 0.069 | 0.882 | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| d_lnzzl | 15 | 0.070 | 0.882 | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| d_lnzzl | 20 | 0.070 | 0.882 | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| d_lnzzl | 25 | 0.070 | 0.882 | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| d_lnzzl | 30 | 0.070 | 0.882 | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| d_lnwlry | 1 | 0.028 | 0.038 | 0.934 | 0.000 |
| d_lnwlry | 2 | 0.028 | 0.052 | 0.920 | 0.000 |
| d_lnwlry | 3 | 0.031 | 0.055 | 0.913 | 0.001 |
| d_lnwlry | 4 | 0.091 | 0.078 | 0.830 | 0.001 |
| d_lnwlry | 5 | 0.092 | 0.081 | 0.826 | 0.001 |
| d_lnwlry | 10 | 0.089 | 0.166 | 0.737 | 0.009 |
| d_lnwlry | 15 | 0.090 | 0.169 | 0.731 | 0.010 |
| d_lnwlry | 20 | 0.090 | 0.169 | 0.731 | 0.010 |
| d_lnwlry | 25 | 0.090 | 0.169 | 0.731 | 0.010 |
| d_lnwlry | 30 | 0.090 | 0.169 | 0.731 | 0.010 |
| d_lndjglmd | 1 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.993 |
| d_lndjglmd | 2 | 0.010 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.983 |
| d_lndjglmd | 3 | 0.018 | 0.012 | 0.004 | 0.967 |
| d_lndjglmd | 4 | 0.039 | 0.017 | 0.004 | 0.940 |
| d_lndjglmd | 5 | 0.057 | 0.034 | 0.021 | 0.888 |
| d_lndjglmd | 10 | 0.067 | 0.039 | 0.029 | 0.865 |
| d_lndjglmd | 15 | 0.067 | 0.041 | 0.029 | 0.863 |
| d_lndjglmd | 20 | 0.067 | 0.042 | 0.029 | 0.862 |
| d_lndjglmd | 25 | 0.067 | 0.042 | 0.029 | 0.862 |
| d_lndjglmd | 30 | 0.067 | 0.042 | 0.029 | 0.862 |
Description of unit root test results of variables.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lngymi | HT | 0.1432 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.0211 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| lnzzl | HT | 0.5169 | 0.0007 | stable |
| IPS | -1.3768 | 0.0843 | stable | |
| lnwlry | HT | 0.5913 | 0.0998 | stable |
| IPS | -4.4015 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| lndjglmd | HT | 0.7002 | 0.9231 | unstable |
| IPS | -1.8715 | 0.0306 | stable |
Description of unit root test results of variable first-order difference sequence.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d_lngymi | HT | -0.4982 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -13.9557 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnzzl | HT | -0.1739 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.3001 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnwlry | HT | -0.0154 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.6296 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lndjglmd | HT | 0.1008 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.7387 | 0.0000 | stable |
Cointegration test of logistics industry and manufacturing MI.
| Statistic | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kao test | Modified Dickey-Fuller t | -15.1234 | 0.0000 |
| Dickey-Fuller t | -39.0954 | 0.0000 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -16.0384 | 0.0000 | |
| Unadjusted modified Dickey Fuller t | -34.9794 | 0.0000 | |
| Unadjusted Dickey-Fuller t | -44.6636 | 0.0000 | |
| Pedroni test | Modified Phillips-Perron t | -2.5935 | 0.0047 |
| Phillips-Perron t | -31.9687 | 0.0000 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -35.7775 | 0.0000 | |
| Westerlund test | Variance ratio | -4.0730 | 0.0000 |
Lag test of PVAR model for logistics industry and manufacturing MI.
| lag | AIC | BIC | HQIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.18751 | -2.9456 | -3.69803 |
| 2 | -4.48405 | -3.02186 | -3.90613 |
| 3 | -4.83609 | -3.1276 | -4.15883 |
| 4 | -6.1778 | -4.19157 | -5.38804 |
| 5 | -6.84241* | -4.53993* | -5.92398* |
GMM estimation results of PVAR model for logistics industry and manufacturing MI.
| h_d_lngyzhxl | h_d_lnzzl | h_d_lnwlry | h_d_lndjglmd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.h_d_lngymi | -0.5666 | -0.0040 | 0.0261 | -0.0155 |
| L.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0425 | -0.1765 | 0.0652 | 0.0007 |
| L.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0247 | -0.1283 | 0.0563 | -0.0179 |
| L.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.1540 | 0.8624 | -0.2021 | 0.4664 |
| L2.h_d_lngymi | -0.3314 | -0.2545 | 0.1420 | -0.0031 |
| L2.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0664 | 0.0514 | 0.0308 | 0.0257 |
| L2.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0636 | -0.3327 | 0.0024 | -0.0078 |
| L2.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0637 | 0.4545 | -0.0114 | 0.0192 |
| L3.h_d_lngymi | -0.3582 | -0.0124 | 0.0447 | 0.0476 |
| L3.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0358 | -0.0264 | 0.0799 | 0.0157 |
| L3.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0947 | -0.0314 | 0.0560 | 0.0025 |
| L3.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0261 | -0.0310 | -0.0806 | -0.0111 |
| L4.h_d_lngymi | -0.2437 | 0.0683 | 0.0452 | 0.0776 |
| L4.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0686 | -0.0181 | 0.0327 | 0.0165 |
| L4.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0169 | 0.1181 | 0.0237 | -0.0528 |
| L4.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.1215 | 0.0943 | 0.0312 | -0.0570 |
| L5.h_d_lngymi | -0.1854 | 0.0045 | -0.0141 | 0.0396 |
| L5.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0014 | 0.2124 | 0.1493 | 0.0061 |
| L5.h_d_lnwlry | 0.1026 | 0.0753 | -0.0255 | -0.0190 |
| L5.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0727 | 0.2187 | -0.0356 | 0.0176 |
Note
* ** *** represents the significance levels of 10%,5% and 1% respectively.
where, h_ represents the variable after eliminating the fixed effect by Helmert transform. L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 indicate lag first order to lag fifth order.
Granger causality test of logistics industry and the manufacturing MI.
| Original hypothesis: the latter is not the Granger reason of the former | p-value | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h_d_lngymi | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.129 | rejected |
| h_d_lngymi | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.195 | rejected |
| h_d_lngymi | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.139 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lngymi | 0.200 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.010 | supported |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.000 | supported |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lngymi | 0.036 | supported |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.000 | supported |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.036 | supported |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lngymi | 0.011 | supported |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.054 | supported |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.175 | rejected |
Fig 3Impulse response diagram of logistics industry and manufacturing MI.
Variance decomposition of logistics industry and manufacturing MI.
| Variables | Phase | d_lngymi | d_lnzzl | d_lnwlry | d_lndjglmd |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d_lngymi | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| d_lngymi | 2 | 0.993 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| d_lngymi | 3 | 0.987 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| d_lngymi | 4 | 0.984 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| d_lngymi | 5 | 0.980 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| d_lngymi | 10 | 0.970 | 0.016 | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| d_lngymi | 15 | 0.968 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| d_lngymi | 20 | 0.968 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| d_lngymi | 25 | 0.968 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| d_lngymi | 30 | 0.968 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| d_lnzzl | 1 | 0.001 | 0.999 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| d_lnzzl | 2 | 0.001 | 0.970 | 0.005 | 0.024 |
| d_lnzzl | 3 | 0.016 | 0.919 | 0.026 | 0.039 |
| d_lnzzl | 4 | 0.022 | 0.911 | 0.026 | 0.042 |
| d_lnzzl | 5 | 0.022 | 0.907 | 0.026 | 0.045 |
| d_lnzzl | 10 | 0.025 | 0.899 | 0.028 | 0.048 |
| d_lnzzl | 15 | 0.025 | 0.899 | 0.029 | 0.048 |
| d_lnzzl | 20 | 0.025 | 0.899 | 0.029 | 0.048 |
| d_lnzzl | 25 | 0.025 | 0.899 | 0.029 | 0.048 |
| d_lnzzl | 30 | 0.025 | 0.899 | 0.029 | 0.048 |
| d_lnwlry | 1 | 0.018 | 0.045 | 0.937 | 0.000 |
| d_lnwlry | 2 | 0.018 | 0.062 | 0.913 | 0.007 |
| d_lnwlry | 3 | 0.045 | 0.063 | 0.885 | 0.007 |
| d_lnwlry | 4 | 0.047 | 0.081 | 0.864 | 0.008 |
| d_lnwlry | 5 | 0.047 | 0.082 | 0.863 | 0.008 |
| d_lnwlry | 10 | 0.053 | 0.166 | 0.763 | 0.019 |
| d_lnwlry | 15 | 0.053 | 0.168 | 0.758 | 0.020 |
| d_lnwlry | 20 | 0.053 | 0.169 | 0.758 | 0.020 |
| d_lnwlry | 25 | 0.053 | 0.169 | 0.758 | 0.020 |
| d_lnwlry | 30 | 0.053 | 0.169 | 0.758 | 0.020 |
| d_lndjglmd | 1 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.011 | 0.988 |
| d_lndjglmd | 2 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.015 | 0.982 |
| d_lndjglmd | 3 | 0.003 | 0.015 | 0.017 | 0.965 |
| d_lndjglmd | 4 | 0.017 | 0.026 | 0.018 | 0.939 |
| d_lndjglmd | 5 | 0.051 | 0.042 | 0.035 | 0.873 |
| d_lndjglmd | 10 | 0.061 | 0.044 | 0.049 | 0.846 |
| d_lndjglmd | 15 | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.844 |
| d_lndjglmd | 20 | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.844 |
| d_lndjglmd | 25 | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.844 |
| d_lndjglmd | 30 | 0.063 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.844 |
Description of unit root test results of variables.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lnwgd | HT | 0.5847 | 0.0739 | stable |
| IPS | -4.5352 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| lnzzl | HT | 0.5169 | 0.0007 | stable |
| IPS | -1.3768 | 0.0843 | stable | |
| lnwlry | HT | 0.5913 | 0.0998 | stable |
| IPS | -4.4015 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| lndjglmd | HT | 0.7002 | 0.9231 | unstable |
| IPS | -1.8715 | 0.0306 | stable |
Description of unit root test results of variable first-order difference sequence.
| Variables | Inspection method | Statistic | p-value | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d_lnwgd | HT | -0.0680 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.7434 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnzzl | HT | -0.1739 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.3001 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lnwlry | HT | -0.0154 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -11.6296 | 0.0000 | stable | |
| d_lndjglmd | HT | 0.1008 | 0.0000 | stable |
| IPS | -9.7387 | 0.0000 | stable |
Cointegration test of logistics industry and the efficiency of two-industry-linkage.
| Statistic | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kao test | Modified Dickey-Fuller t | -20.8575 | 0.0801 |
| Dickey-Fuller t | -19.0564 | 0.0054 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -11.9155 | 0.3913 | |
| Unadjusted modified Dickey Fuller t | -24.2188 | 0.0903 | |
| Unadjusted Dickey-Fuller t | -19.3999 | 0.0060 | |
| Pedroni test | Modified Phillips-Perron t | -0.1912 | 0.4242 |
| Phillips-Perron t | -11.3056 | 0.0000 | |
| Augmented Dickey-Fuller t | -11.9484 | 0.0000 | |
| Westerlund test | Variance ratio | -1.7388 | 0.0410 |
Lag test of PVAR model for logistics and the efficiency of the two-industry-linkage.
| lag | AIC | BIC | HQIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.6878 | -4.50522 | -5.22295 |
| 2 | -5.76426 | -4.37625 | -5.2172 |
| 3 | -5.70942 | -4.09332 | -5.07066 |
| 4 | -5.6837 | -3.81249 | -4.94194 |
| 5 | -7.26302* | -5.10407* | -6.40458* |
GMM estimation results of PVAR model for logistics industry and the efficiency of two-industry-linkage.
| h_d_lnwgd | h_d_lnzzl | h_d_lnwlry | h_d_lndjglmd | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L.h_d_lnwgd | 0.1414 | -0.2222 | 0.1460 | -0.0061 |
| L.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0076 | -0.1370 | 0.0557 | 0.0073 |
| L.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0620 | -0.0838 | -0.0352 | -0.0301 |
| L.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0239 | 0.1718 | 0.0297 | 0.1526 |
| L2.h_d_lnwgd | -0.0252 | -0.0220 | 0.0644 | 0.0488 |
| L2.h_d_lnzzl | 0.0089 | 0.0539 | 0.0431 | 0.0263 |
| L2.h_d_lnwlry | -0.0246 | -0.3245 | 0.0422 | -0.0040 |
| L2.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.1204 | 0.6274 | -0.0729 | 0.0687 |
| L3.h_d_lnwgd | -0.0436 | 0.2711 | -0.2398 | 0.0420 |
| L3.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0315 | 0.0150 | 0.0780 | 0.0257 |
| L3.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0297 | -0.0507 | 0.0655 | -0.0088 |
| L3.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0163 | -0.0588 | -0.0337 | 0.0212 |
| L4.h_d_lnwgd | -0.1032 | -0.0360 | -0.0671 | 0.0411 |
| L4.h_d_lnzzl | 0.0263 | 0.0151 | 0.0351 | 0.0326 |
| L4.h_d_lnwlry | -0.1592 | 0.0494 | 0.0970 | -0.0759 |
| L4.h_d_lndjglmd | -0.0792 | 0.1011 | -0.0022 | -0.0454 |
| L5.h_d_lnwgd | -0.1042 | 0.2068 | -0.1076 | 0.0464 |
| L5.h_d_lnzzl | -0.0030 | 0.2335 | 0.1390 | 0.0235 |
| L5.h_d_lnwlry | 0.0165 | -0.0438 | 0.0283 | -0.0366 |
| L5.h_d_lndjglmd | 0.0468 | 0.1625 | -0.0194 | -0.0103 |
Note
* ** *** represents the significance levels of 10%,5% and 1% respectively.
where, h_ represents the variable after eliminating the fixed effect by Helmert transform. L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 indicate lag first order to lag fifth order.
Granger causality test of logistics industry and the efficiency of two-industry-linkage.
| Original hypothesis: the latter is not the Granger reason of the former | p-value | Conclusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| h_d_lnwgd | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.164 | supported |
| h_d_lnwgd | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.001 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwgd | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.002 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lnwgd | 0.057 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.086 | rejected |
| h_d_lnzzl | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.000 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lnwgd | 0.001 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.000 | rejected |
| h_d_lnwlry | - | h_d_lndjglmd | 0.129 | supported |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnwgd | 0.177 | supported |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnzzl | 0.042 | rejected |
| h_d_lndjglmd | - | h_d_lnwlry | 0.019 | rejected |
Fig 4Impulse response diagram of logistics industry and the efficiency of two-industry-linkage.
Variance decomposition of logistics industry and the efficiency of two-industry-linkage.
| Variables | Phase | lnwgd | lnzzl | lnqc | lnlw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lnwgd | 1 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| lnwgd | 2 | 0.994 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| lnwgd | 3 | 0.987 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| lnwgd | 4 | 0.975 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| lnwgd | 5 | 0.937 | 0.017 | 0.036 | 0.009 |
| lnwgd | 10 | 0.929 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| lnwgd | 15 | 0.928 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| lnwgd | 20 | 0.928 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| lnwgd | 25 | 0.928 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| lnwgd | 30 | 0.928 | 0.026 | 0.036 | 0.010 |
| lnzzl | 1 | 0.005 | 0.995 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| lnzzl | 2 | 0.011 | 0.986 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| lnzzl | 3 | 0.011 | 0.945 | 0.018 | 0.025 |
| lnzzl | 4 | 0.017 | 0.940 | 0.018 | 0.025 |
| lnzzl | 5 | 0.017 | 0.937 | 0.018 | 0.028 |
| lnzzl | 10 | 0.027 | 0.919 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| lnzzl | 15 | 0.027 | 0.918 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| lnzzl | 20 | 0.027 | 0.918 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| lnzzl | 25 | 0.027 | 0.918 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| lnzzl | 30 | 0.027 | 0.918 | 0.026 | 0.029 |
| lnwlry | 1 | 0.005 | 0.038 | 0.957 | 0.000 |
| lnwlry | 2 | 0.017 | 0.054 | 0.929 | 0.000 |
| lnwlry | 3 | 0.020 | 0.058 | 0.921 | 0.001 |
| lnwlry | 4 | 0.058 | 0.079 | 0.862 | 0.001 |
| lnwlry | 5 | 0.062 | 0.080 | 0.857 | 0.001 |
| lnwlry | 10 | 0.073 | 0.168 | 0.749 | 0.010 |
| lnwlry | 15 | 0.073 | 0.175 | 0.741 | 0.011 |
| lnwlry | 20 | 0.073 | 0.175 | 0.741 | 0.011 |
| lnwlry | 25 | 0.073 | 0.175 | 0.740 | 0.011 |
| lnwlry | 30 | 0.073 | 0.175 | 0.740 | 0.011 |
| lndjglmd | 1 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.993 |
| lndjglmd | 2 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.987 |
| lndjglmd | 3 | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.005 | 0.975 |
| lndjglmd | 4 | 0.008 | 0.026 | 0.006 | 0.961 |
| lndjglmd | 5 | 0.011 | 0.048 | 0.028 | 0.913 |
| lndjglmd | 10 | 0.015 | 0.056 | 0.046 | 0.882 |
| lndjglmd | 15 | 0.016 | 0.059 | 0.047 | 0.878 |
| lndjglmd | 20 | 0.016 | 0.060 | 0.047 | 0.877 |
| lndjglmd | 25 | 0.016 | 0.060 | 0.047 | 0.877 |
| lndjglmd | 30 | 0.016 | 0.060 | 0.047 | 0.877 |