Literature DB >> 35238703

Outcomes Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Children With Conotruncal Anomalies.

Bahaaldin Alsoufi1, Jessica H Knight2, James St Louis3, Geetha Raghuveer4, Lazaros Kochilas5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Conotruncal anomalies can develop aortopathy and/or aortic valve (AV) disease and AV replacement (AVR) is occasionally needed. We report long-term results and examine factors affecting survival following AVR in this group.
METHODS: We queried the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium (PCCC, US database for interventions for congenital heart diseases) to identify patients with repaired conotruncal anomalies and AVR. Long-term outcomes were provided by the PCCC, the US National Death Index, and Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Competing risks analysis examined outcomes following AVR (death/transplantation, reoperation) and multivariable regression analysis assessed significant factors.
RESULTS: One hundred six children with repaired conotruncal anomalies underwent AVR (1982-2003). Underlying anomaly was truncus (n = 40), d-transposition (n = 22), type-B interrupted arch (n = 16), double-outlet right ventricle (n = 12), pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect (n = 9), tetralogy of Fallot (n = 6), corrected transposition (n = 1). 18 (17%) had prior aortic valvuloplasty (surgical = 12, percutaneous = 6). Median age at AVR was 6.9 years (interquartile range = 2.5-12.4). AV pathophysiology was regurgitation (n = 83, 78%), stenosis (n = 9, 9%), and mixed (n = 14, 15%). AVR type was mechanical (n = 72, 68%), homograft (n = 21, 20%), and Ross (n = 13, 12%). Operative mortality was 13(12%). Infant age at AVR was risk factor (odds ratio = 55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 6-539, P = .0006). On competing risks analysis, five years after AVR, 6% died or received transplantation, 20% had reoperation. Twenty-five years transplant-free survival was 53%. Factors associated with death after hospital discharge included mitral surgery (hazards ratio [HR] = 11, 95% CI = 3-39, P = .0002), underlying defect (HR = 2, 95% CI = 1-5, P = .446). Twenty years transplant-free survival in conotruncal anomalies group was inferior to matched children undergoing AVR for congenital non-conotruncal disease (61% vs 82%, P = .0012).
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival following AVR in children with conotruncal anomalies is inferior to that of isolated congenital AV disease and is linked to an underlying cardiac defect. Although valve type was not associated with survival, infant age was a risk factor for operative mortality. Continuous attrition and high reoperation warrant vigilant monitoring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; Ross; allograft; conotruncal anomalies; heart valve; homograft; mechanical; replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35238703      PMCID: PMC9205217          DOI: 10.1177/21501351211072476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg        ISSN: 2150-1351


  25 in total

1.  Dimensions of the ascending aorta in conotruncal heart defects.

Authors:  Amedeo Trippel; Sabine Pallivathukal; Jean-Pierre Pfammatter; Damian Hutter; Alexander Kadner; Mladen Pavlovic
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Surgical outcomes in the treatment of patients with tetralogy of Fallot and absent pulmonary valve.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi; William G Williams; Zhongdong Hua; Sally Cai; Tara Karamlou; Chee Ching Chan; John G Coles; Glen S Van Arsdell; Christopher A Caldarone
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Long-term results of anatomic correction for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: A 19-year experience.

Authors:  Christian P Brizard; Alice Lee; Diana Zannino; Andrew M Davis; Tyson A Fricke; Yves d'Udekem; Igor E Konstantinov; Johann Brink; Michael M H Cheung
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Neo-aortic valvar function after the arterial switch.

Authors:  Bradley S Marino; Gil Wernovsky; Doff B McElhinney; Abbas Jawad; Dieuwertje L Kreb; Suzan F Mantel; Wendy L van der Woerd; Danielle Robbers-Visser; Rita Novello; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Meryl S Cohen
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.093

5.  Persistent risk of subsequent procedures and mortality in patients after interrupted aortic arch repair: a Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society study.

Authors:  Anusha Jegatheeswaran; Brian W McCrindle; Eugene H Blackstone; Marshall L Jacobs; Gary K Lofland; Earl H Austin; Thomas Yeh; Victor Morell; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Richard A Jonas; Sally Cai; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Marco Ricci; William G Williams; Christopher A Caldarone; William M DeCampli
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Management of the aortic root in adult patients with conotruncal anomalies.

Authors:  Joseph A Dearani; Harold M Burkhart; John M Stulak; Thoralf M Sundt; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu       Date:  2009

7.  Selective management strategy of interrupted aortic arch mitigates left ventricular outflow tract obstruction risk.

Authors:  Bahaaldin Alsoufi; Brian Schlosser; Courtney McCracken; Ritu Sachdeva; Brian Kogon; William Border; William T Mahle; Kirk Kanter
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Ross Versus Non-Ross Aortic Valve Replacement in Children: A 22-Year Single Institution Comparison of Outcomes.

Authors:  John W Brown; Parth M Patel; Jiuann-Huey Ivy Lin; Asma S Habib; Mark D Rodefeld; Mark W Turrentine
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Primary and secondary aortopathy associated with adult congenital heart disease - retrospective study.

Authors:  Ingrid Schusterova; Alžbeta Banovcinova; Marianna Vachalcova; Marta Jakubova; Panagiotis Artemiou
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.