Literature DB >> 35237891

Medical 3D Printing Dimensional Accuracy for Multi-pathological Anatomical Models 3D Printed Using Material Extrusion.

Prashanth Ravi1, Leonid L Chepelev2, Gabrielle V Stichweh3, Benjamin S Jones3, Frank J Rybicki4.   

Abstract

Medical 3D printing of anatomical models is being increasingly applied in healthcare facilities. The accuracy of such 3D-printed anatomical models is an important aspect of their overall quality control. The purpose of this research was to test whether the accuracy of a variety of anatomical models 3D printed using Material Extrusion (MEX) lies within a reasonable tolerance level, defined as less than 1-mm dimensional error. Six medical models spanning across anatomical regions (musculoskeletal, neurological, abdominal, cardiovascular) and sizes (model volumes ranging from ~ 4 to 203 cc) were chosen for the primary study. Three measurement landing blocks were strategically designed within each of the six medical models to allow high-resolution caliper measurements. An 8-cc reference cube was printed as the 7th model in the primary study. In the secondary study, the effect of model rotation and scale was assessed using two of the models from the first study. All models were 3D printed using an Ultimaker 3 printer in triplicates. All absolute measurement errors were found to be less than 1 mm with a maximum error of 0.89 mm. The maximum relative error was 2.78%. The average absolute error was 0.26 mm, and the average relative error was 0.71% in the primary study, and the results were similar in the secondary study with an average absolute error of 0.30 mm and an average relative error of 0.60%. The relative errors demonstrated certain patterns in the data, which were explained based on the mechanics of MEX 3D printing. Results indicate that the MEX process, when carefully assessed on a case-by-case basis, could be suitable for the 3D printing of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning if an accuracy level of 1 mm is deemed sufficient for the application.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Anatomical models; Material extrusion; Medical 3D printing; Surgical planning; Ultimaker 3

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35237891      PMCID: PMC9156585          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00614-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  7 in total

Review 1.  Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist.

Authors:  Dimitris Mitsouras; Peter Liacouras; Amir Imanzadeh; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Tianrun Cai; Kanako K Kumamaru; Elizabeth George; Nicole Wake; Edward J Caterson; Bohdan Pomahac; Vincent B Ho; Gerald T Grant; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Can an entry-level 3D printer create high-quality anatomical models? Accuracy assessment of mandibular models printed by a desktop 3D printer and a professional device.

Authors:  C R Hatz; B Msallem; S Aghlmandi; P Brantner; F M Thieringer
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  A systematic evaluation of medical 3D printing accuracy of multi-pathological anatomical models for surgical planning manufactured in elastic and rigid material using desktop inverted vat photopolymerization.

Authors:  Prashanth Ravi; Leonid Chepelev; Nathan Lawera; Khan Md Ariful Haque; Victoria C P Chen; Arafat Ali; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.

Authors:  Michele Buda; Manuel Bratos; John A Sorensen
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Geometrical accuracy evaluation of an affordable 3D printing technology for spine physical models.

Authors:  Peter Endre Eltes; Laszlo Kiss; Marton Bartos; Zoltan Magor Gyorgy; Tibor Csakany; Ferenc Bereczki; Vivien Lesko; Maria Puhl; Peter Pal Varga; Aron Lazary
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  An investigation into the effect of changing the computed tomography slice reconstruction interval on the spatial replication accuracy of three-dimensional printed anatomical models constructed by fused deposition modelling.

Authors:  Ben Searle; Deborah Starkey
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-02-13
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating surface coatings to reduce bone cement adhesion to point of care 3D printed molds in the intraoperative setting.

Authors:  Brian Beitler; Gregory R Roytman; Grace Parmer; Steven M Tommasini; Daniel H Wiznia
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2022-08-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.