| Literature DB >> 35237591 |
Si-Si Luo1,2, Ke-Xin Zou1,2, Hong Zhu3,4, Yi Cheng3,4, Yi-Shang Yan5, Jian-Zhong Sheng5, He-Feng Huang2,3,4,5, Guo-Lian Ding3,4.
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that adverse intrauterine environments could affect the long-term health of offspring. Recent evidence indicates that gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with neurocognitive changes in offspring. However, the mechanism remains unclear. Using a GDM mouse model, we collected hippocampi, the structure critical to cognitive processes, for electron microscopy, methylome and transcriptome analyses. Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and RNA-seq in the GDM fetal hippocampi showed altered methylated modification and differentially expressed genes enriched in common pathways involved in neural synapse organization and signal transmission. We further collected fetal mice brains for metabolome analysis and found that in GDM fetal brains, the metabolites displayed significant changes, in addition to directly inducing cognitive dysfunction, some of which are important to methylation status such as betaine, fumaric acid, L-methionine, succinic acid, 5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid, and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM). These results suggest that GDM affects metabolites in fetal mice brains and further affects hippocampal DNA methylation and gene regulation involved in cognition, which is a potential mechanism for the adverse neurocognitive effects of GDM in offspring.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; fetal mouse brain; gestational diabetes mellitus; hippocampus; metabolomics; transcriptomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35237591 PMCID: PMC8883435 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.748862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Ultrastructure of the hippocampus in fetal mice using transmission electron microscopy. (A,C) Neural cells of the fetal hippocampus via transmission electron microscopy in the Ctrl group. Scale bar, 5 μm (A); Scale bar, 2 μm (C). (B,D) Neural cells of the fetal hippocampus via transmission electron microscopy in the GDM group. Scale bar, 5 μm (B); Scale bar, 2 μm (D). In GDM group, the chromatin aggregated into several clumps (arrows); the shape of the nucleus was irregular; and the nuclei shrinkage was obvious (asterisk).
FIGURE 2Gene methylation analysis of the GDM and control groups. (A) Bar plot of the distribution of differentially methylated loci in different components of the genome. (B) The top 10 hypomethylated (blue) and hypermethylated (red) genes. (C) GO terms of biological process enriched by DMGs. The color gradient from dark blue to dark red indicates smaller p-value. (D) Bubble plot of the top 20 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment results of DMGs. The size of the circle corresponds gene number enriched in the pathway. The color gradient from dark blue to dark red indicates smaller p-value.
FIGURE 3Gene expression analysis of the GDM and control groups. (A) Supervised PCA of DEGs. (B) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of DEGs. Data are expressed as Z score-normalized values of FPKM. The color gradient from dark blue to dark red in the heatmap indicates increasing transcript levels. (C) The top 10 down-regulated and up-regulated genes. Data are expressed as Z score-normalized values of FPKM. The color gradient from dark blue to dark red in the heatmap indicates increasing transcript levels. (D) Top 10 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways of DEGs. The solid circle represents the enriched pathway. The open circle represents genes enriched in the KEGG pathways. A larger size of a solid cycle means more enriched genes. The deeper color of the solid cycle represents a lower p value. (E) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment of DEGs, including BP (biological process), CC (cellular component), and MF (molecular function).
FIGURE 4Gene expression and methylation co-analysis. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the overlap of differentially expressed genes and differentially methylated genes. (B) Relationship of transcriptomic (y-axis) and methylation (x-axis) profiling based on overlapping genes of DEGs and DMGs. Different colors represent different methylated positions in gene elements. (C) Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of biological process (BP) based on shared genes of RNA-seq and RRBS. The color gradient from dark purple to dark pink in the heatmap indicates fold change of DEGs. The bubble size is related to the impact of the pathway. (D) Network analysis based on differentially methylated and differentially expressed genes with a relationship confidence greater than 0.75. Larger blue circles indicate candidate genes identified from our analysis, and smaller black circles denote imputed interacting genes in the hippocampus.
FIGURE 5Metabolite analysis of the GDM and control groups. (A) Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) in positive and (B) negative ion mode was utilized to display the variance of the samples. (C) The volcano indicates the changes in fetal brain metabolite profiles. Metabolites up-regulated or down-regulated by |log2FoldChange| > 1.5 are shown in red and blue, respectively. (D) Bar plot of classification of the detected metabolites into major functional classes. (E) Heatmap presentation of the top 30 differential metabolites in fetal brains. (F) Different metabolic pathways in GDM fetal brains. Each bubble represents a metabolic pathway. The bubble size is related to the impact of the pathway and color (varying from yellow to red) means the metabolites are in the data with different levels of significance.
FIGURE 6Comparison of the intensity of representative metabolites related to epigenetic modification between the control and GDM groups. *p < .05 vs. Control; **p < .01 vs. Control; ** **p < .0001 vs. Control.
FIGURE 7TCA cycle, tryptophan metabolism, and tyrosine metabolism in visual representation of the interaction between the transcriptome and metabolome. Dark blue circles represent differentially expressed genes; light blue circles represent inferred gene; dark red hexagons represent significantly changed metabolites; light red hexagons represent inferred metabolite; gray lines represent protein-protein or protein-metabolite interactions.
Metabolic pathways identified in the interactome network, incorporating gene transcription and metabolite profiles.
| Metabolic pathways enriched within the interactome network | Differentially expressed genes | Differential metabolites |
|---|---|---|
| TCA cycle |
| Fumarate, Isocitrate, Succinate |
| Tryptophan metabolism |
| L-kynurenine, |
| Tyrosine metabolism |
| Fumarate, Phenethylamine, L-phenylalanine, L-Tyrosine |
| Purine metabolism |
| Guanine, Hypoxanthine, Xanthine, cAMP, L-aspartate, Fumarate, 5′-XMP, carboxamide, 1-(5′-phosphoribosyl)-5-amino-4-imidazole-, Xanthosine, Adenosine |
| Metabolism of arginine, proline, glutamate, aspartate and asparagine |
| L-proline, L-arginine, Glutathione, GSSG, SAM, L-aspartate, N-(L-arginino)succinate, Fumarate, spermine, Spermidine, L-lysine, 4-aminobutanoate, N-acetylornithine |