| Literature DB >> 35237393 |
Abstract
The success or failure of badminton competition often depends on the training level of technical, physical, tactical, and psychological quality, as well as the competitive ability to comprehensively use these factors in the competition. Aiming at the improvement of the BP neural network algorithm, the improved BP neural network algorithm is used to analyze the multidimensional attributes of the collected data, and the simulation experiment is carried out to find out our competitive advantages and disadvantages. This paper presents a statistical study on the change of service area, the application of service receiving technology, and the treatment of the third stroke technology in the badminton competition. The innovative contribution of this paper is to explore the differences of double service decision-making of badminton at different levels and form a theoretical mechanism analysis system. The research shows that the relationship between active and passive attack and hitting quality has been dealt with in the game. In training, mastering the basic technical movements of badminton is conducive to improving the technical level of badminton.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35237393 PMCID: PMC8885290 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5295881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Data conversion of the BP neural network.
| Constraint | Transformation | |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensionality reduction | 16.90 | 15.46 |
| Null value processing | 15.73 | 16.72 |
Figure 1BP neural network model.
Technical parameters of receiving and serving in badminton doubles.
| Judge | Influence | |
|---|---|---|
| Front-court receiving and serving techniques | 3.64 | 2.94 |
| Backcourt receiving technology | 3.05 | 2.58 |
Figure 2Technical parameters of receiving and serving in badminton doubles.
Endurance quality training.
| Load capacity | Decision number | |
|---|---|---|
| Speed endurance | 23.64 | 19.09 |
| Aerobic endurance | 26.82 | 18.33 |
Figure 3Endurance quality training.
Speed quality training.
| Load capacity | Decision number | |
|---|---|---|
| Action speed | 20.64 | 15.42 |
| Reaction rate | 21.30 | 16.50 |
Figure 4Speed quality training.
Analysis of badminton major technical testachievements.
| Average | Standard deviation | |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | 84 | 0.64 |
| Batting | 71 | 0.92 |
| Smash | 68 | 0.81 |
Figure 5Analysis of badminton major technical test achievements.
Figure 6Statistics of receiving and serving techniques.
Figure 7Iterative variation of BP network parameters.