| Literature DB >> 35237210 |
Lei Lei Wen1,2, Keheng Xiang1,3, Fan Gao3, Jieling Zhou4.
Abstract
This study uses an integrated model of resource conservation theory and social learning theory to explore the antecedents of hotel interns' perceptions of occupational stigma and to explore the mechanisms inherent to retention willingness. This study first manipulated relevant subjects' experimental materials through a contextual experiment and used a one-way ANOVA to test the effects of competence stereotypes and occupational stereotypes on hotel interns' stigma perceptions, respectively, and then used partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) as a statistical tool and the SmartPLS 3.0 program to validate the model of hotel interns' occupational stigma perceptions-intention. The effects of both competence stereotypes and occupational stereotypes on hotel interns' perceptions of occupational stigma were significant. The results of the partial least squares structural equation model showed that hotel interns' perceptions of occupational stigma significantly contributed to emotional exhaustion and that emotional exhaustion significantly influenced hotel interns' retention willingness, hotel interns' perceptions of occupational stigma had a significant effect on their retention willingness, while the role of emotional exhaustion as a mediating variable and occupational commitment as a moderator. The inner psychological and behavioral linkage mechanisms of hotel interns' occupational stigma perceptions and their retention willingness under COVID-19 were explored, and the resource dynamics operating mechanism and professional commitment were also confirmed.Entities:
Keywords: emotional exhaustion; occupational stigma theory; organizational behavior; retention willingness; social learning theory
Year: 2022 PMID: 35237210 PMCID: PMC8882973 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Research theoretical framework.
FIGURE 2Hypothesis and content framework of this study.
Research framework.
| Study | Study Goals | Data Source | Interviewees | Experiment Manipulation |
| Study 1a | The effect of competency stereotypes on the perceived occupational stigma of hotel interns | Situational experiment I | Guests | Information-Competence type (Positive valence vs. Negative valence) |
| Study 1b | The effect of occupational stereotypes on the perceived occupational stigma of hotel interns | Situational experiment II | Guests | Information-Stereotype (Positive valence vs. Negative valence) |
| Study 3 | Related varies of Mediating and moderating effects of perceived occupational stigma of hotel interns on their intention willingness in the workplace | Field experiment | Hotel Interns | − |
Test result of Experiment I.
| Valence |
| Stigma | Test result | |||
| Mean | SD | MD | ||||
| Experiment I | Positive | 58 | 5.061 | 0.48367 | 0.72762 | Support |
| Competence Stereotype | Negative | 47 | 4.3333 | 0.7779 | ||
| Experiment I | Positive | 56 | 5.3016 | 1.08163 | −1.28889 | Support |
| Occupation Stereotype | Negative | 49 | 6.5905 | 0.20805 |
SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference. *p < 0.1.
Test result of H2.
| Valence |
| Stigma | Test result | |||
| Mean | SD | MD | ||||
| Experiment II | Positive | 58 | 4.9327 | 0.70613 | −0.93861 | Support |
| Competence Stereotype | Negative | 47 | 5.8713 | 0.35954 | ||
| Experiment II | Positive | 56 | 5.6172 | 0.59327 | −0.94059 | Support |
| Occupation Stereotype | Negative | 49 | 6.5578 | 0.24993 |
SD, standard deviation; MD, mean difference. *p < 0.01.
Sample’s descriptive statistical information.
| Characteristic | Valid N | Valid Percent | Cum. Percent |
|
| |||
| Male | 140 | 40.2 | 40.2 |
| Female | 208 | 59.8 | 100.0 |
|
| |||
| 18–20 years | 166 | 47.4 | 47.7 |
| 21–23 years | 76 | 21.8 | 69.5 |
| 24–25 years | 48 | 13.8 | 83.3 |
| 25–26 years | 58 | 16.7 | 100.0 |
|
| |||
| 0–1 months | 57 | 16.4 | 16.4 |
| 1–3 months | 120 | 34.5 | 50.9 |
| 3–5 months | 107 | 30.7 | 81.6 |
| 5 months or above | 64 | 18.4 | 100 |
|
| |||
| Hospitality and Tourism | 208 | 59.8 | 59.8 |
| Non-Hospitality and Tourism | 140 | 40.2 | 100 |
Analysis of scale reliability and convergence validity.
| Construct and scale item | Mean | SD | Loading | Cronbach’s α | CR | AVE |
|
| 0.739 | 0.853 | 0.660 | |||
| S1 | 5.97 | 0.998 | 0.588 | |||
| S2 | 5.96 | 1.036 | 0.650 | |||
| S3 | 5.65 | 1.096 | 0.702 | |||
| S4 | 5.67 | 1.182 | 0.774 | |||
| S5 | 5.73 | 1.206 | 0.844 | |||
|
| 0.799 | 0.870 | 0.627 | |||
| E1 | 5.72 | 0.958 | 0.715 | |||
| E2 | 5.85 | 1.074 | 0.608 | |||
| E3 | 5.55 | 1.008 | 0.776 | |||
| E4 | 5.67 | 1.190 | 0.753 | |||
| E5 | 6.02 | 1.339 | 0.869 | |||
|
| 0.903 | 0.923 | 0.633 | |||
| C1 | 5.67 | 1.711 | 0.691 | |||
| C2 | 6.03 | 1.744 | 0.743 | |||
| C3 | 5.46 | 1.781 | 0.772 | |||
| C4 | 5.87 | 1.095 | 0.828 | |||
| C5 | 5.86 | 1.166 | 0.750 | |||
| C6 | 5.61 | 1.122 | 0.794 | |||
| C7 | 5.61 | 1.116 | 0.825 | |||
| C8 | 6.00 | 1.163 | 0.820 | |||
|
| 0.817 | 0.891 | 0.732 | |||
| In1 | 4.76 | 0.702 | 0.913 | |||
| In2 | 4.51 | 0.783 | 0.937 | |||
| In3 | 4.3 | 0.784 | 0.931 | |||
| In4 | 4.57 | 0.867 | 0.596 |
Discriminant validity.
| EE | RW | PC | OSP | |
|
| ||||
| Emotional Exhaustion (EE) |
| |||
| Retention Willingness (RW) | –0.243 |
| ||
| Professional Commitment (PC) | 0.362 | 0.494 |
| |
| Occupational Stigma perception (OSP) | 0.771 | 0.022 | 0.510 |
|
|
| ||||
| Emotional Exhaustion (EE) | ||||
| Retention Willingness (RW) | 0.312 | |||
| Professional Commitment (PC) | 0.409 | 0.563 | ||
| Occupational Stigma perception (OSP) | 0.892 | 0.239 | 0.63 |
Bold figures on the diagonal are the square roots of AVE values.
Path coefficients analysis.
| Hypothesis | Path coefficients | |
| H1: Occupational Stigma Perception → Emotional Exhaustion | 0.771 | 15.452 |
| H2: Emotional Exhaustion → Retention Willingness | –0.659 | 5.962 |
| H3: Occupational Stigma Perception → Retention | 0.533 | 3.315 |
**Represents p < 0.01 and ***represents p < 0.001.
Mediating effects of OSP.
| Hypothesis | Effect | |
| H4: Occupational Stigma perception → Emotional Exhaustion → Retention Willingness | −0.508 | 5.457 |
***Represents p < 0.00.
FIGURE 3Results of the structural model.
Moderating mediation effects of PC.
| Hypothesis | Coefficients | LLCI | ULCI | |
| H5: Occupational Stigma Perception × Professional Commitment → Emotional Exhaustion | 0.1070 | 0.0589 | 0.1551 | 4.3749** |
| H6: Emotional Exhaustion × Professional Commitment → Retention Willingness | 0.0872 | 0.0370 | 0.1374 | 3.4171** |
***Represents p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4Moderating effects of professional commitment. (A) Moderating effects of professional commitment on the relationship between perceived occupational stigma and emotional exhaustion. (B) Moderating effects of professional commitment on the relationship between emotional exhaustion and retention willingness.
Test of moderated mediation effects (conditional indirect effect).
| Conditional indirect effects of Stigma on Retention willingness | ||||
| Bootstrapping 95% CI | ||||
| Moderator level | Effect | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI |
| Low Stigma | −0.3162 | 0.523 | −0.4342 | −0.2288 |
| High Stigma | −0.2888 | 0.823 | −0.4504 | −0.1376 |