| Literature DB >> 35236344 |
Mahdiye Nejadshafiee1, Mahmoud Nekoei-Moghadam2, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy3, Hamidreza Khankeh4, Hojjat Sheikhbardsiri5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Uncertainty occurrence of disasters requires special attention and a shortage of health care specialists is a challenge for health care systems; therefore, the use of telenursing care during a disaster is an appropriate way to provide care. This study aimed to investigate telenursing operational possibilities in disasters.Entities:
Keywords: Disaster; Intervention; Nursing; Simulation; Telemedicine; Telenursing; Victim
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35236344 PMCID: PMC8889514 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01792-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
Fig. 1Telemedicine system architecture
Fig. 2Exercise architecture
Fig. 3The systems utilized in the disaster response exercise
Fig. 4Part of the site disaster response field exercise included casualties from earthquake
Fig. 5Casualty guidance by experienced nurses
Fig. 6Casualty evaluation by Exercise observant
Hypothetical victims characterize and predicted equipment
| Introduce of case | Required equipment |
|---|---|
A Conscious 30-year-old man with right arm fracture and deformity observed in left wrist, open airway and normal breathing, No symptoms of external bleeding, Normal vital signs Vital Signs: BP:110/60, HR: 68, RR: 16 | Types of bandages and casts, sphygmomanometer, peripheral venous catheter, serum |
A 24-year-old woman with lethargy, severe bleeding from the arm, fracture ribs and visible wounds on the chest, GCS 11, asymmetric pupil, laceration in forehead, have respiratory distress, weak and fast pulse Vital Signs: HR: 122, BP: 108/70, RR: 35 | Oxygen, peripheral venous catheter, serum Zinc oxide adhesive plaster, Resuscitation equipment’s, Pulse oximetry, IV Stand, Tourniquet, Disposable Infusion set, Oxygen Mask, Oxygen Capsule |
A 22-year-old man is conscious and have trauma to left femoral and open compound fracture. Respiratory rate above 30, capillary return less than 2 s and It responds to pain and the airway is open Vital Signs: HR: 130, BP: 70/30, RR: 35 | Triage card, peripheral venous catheter, serum, Disposable Infusion set, Splint and flashlight |
A 45-year-old man with a spinal cord injury was unable to move his arms and legs , Neck pain, low blood pressure and is bradycardia Vital Signs: HR: 66, RR:14, BP: 96/70 | Long-backboard, cervical collar, serum, Disposable Infusion set, peripheral venous catheter and flashlight |
A 50-year-old man emerged from under the rubble with extensive crushing on both lower extremities, ecchymosis and severe edema in the affected, pain; the pulse is not touched in the affected areas, disease background with a vague kidney, alert and included normal vital signs Vital Signs: HR: 150, BP: 145/75, RR: 16 | Mannitol serum, monitoring devise, drugs, Disposable Infusion set, IV Stand, chest lead, pansement equipment’s and syringe |
A 5-year-old child with weighs 20 kg, burn on one hand and the front of the chest, restless, large blisters on the limbs Vital Signs: HR: 150, BP: 95/65, RR: 25 | Oxygen, Oxygen Mask, Oxygen Capsule, Disposable Infusion set, peripheral venous catheter, Normal saline or ringer serum, Burn pansement equipment’s |
BP blood pressure, HR heart rate, RR respiratory rate, GCS Glasgow Coma Scale
Evaluating the practice of feasibility of nursing interventions in disasters based on the answers of two evaluators
| Items | First evaluator | Second evaluator |
|---|---|---|
| Completely disagree = 1, Disagree = 2, agree to some extent = 3, agree = 4 and strongly agree = 5 | ||
| (1) In the simulated scenario, audio signal was established at the determined time | 5 | 4 |
| (2) In the simulated scenario, video signal was established at the determined time | 5 | 4 |
| (3) Mutual communication and interaction were clear and transparent | 5 | 3 |
| (4) Nurses used the available communication and information tools easily | 5 | 3 |
| (5) In this scenario, the nurses were well acquainted with their duties | 5 | 4 |
| (6) According to the training given to nurses on how to use communication and information tools before the scenario, they were able to use Skype software | 5 | 3 |
| (7) Nurses' guidance in caring for the hypothetical injured was useful and helpful and they were able to provide the care for the patients. Following the care instructions, the nurse immobilized the fractured arm of the patient with a fiberglass cast | 5 | 5 |
| (8) Expert nurses sent all instructions on how to care for a shocked patient and the relevant nurse operationalized them well | 5 | 4 |
| (9) The expert nurse provided adequate explanations about the triage of the patient No.3 and emphasized the need for emergency care and treatment of the injured | 5 | 5 |
| (10) The nurse caring for a patient with spinal cord trauma could establish audio–video contact with expert nurses and received the necessary instructions on how to limit the movement of neck with cervical collar properly | 5 | 4 |
| (11) The hypothetical patient had extensive crush injury to the lower limbs. The nurse did not have sufficient knowledge and experience in caring for the injured, so she could provide care to the injured with remote guidance and prevented further irreparable complications | 5 | 5 |
| (12) The nurse caring for a child with burns of the anterior chest and one arm implemented the initial measures well under the supervision of expert nurses | 5 | 4 |
| (13) Nurses were able to provide the care to patients | 4 | 4 |
| (14) Nurses used the instructions of expert nurses | 5 | 5 |
| (15) In this scenario, telenursing led to time conservation | 4 | 5 |
| (16) According to the raters, the use of telenursing was a valuable source of information for inexperienced nurses | 5 | 5 |
| (17) Patient care was well managed | 5 | 5 |
| Total scores = 77.50 | 83 = High possibility | 72 = High possibility |