| Literature DB >> 35236310 |
Chenglong Li1,2, Fangkun Liu1,2, Lunquan Sun2,3, Zhixiong Liu1,2, Yu Zeng4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Natural killer (NK) cells-based therapies are one of the most promising strategies against cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the natural killer cell related genes and its prognostic value in glioma.Entities:
Keywords: Brain tumor; Glioma; Natural killer cell; Prognosis; Signature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35236310 PMCID: PMC8892793 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09230-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Prediction of outcome of the gene signature for patients based on the risk score. A, B Alive patients percentage was higher in low risk group than in high risk group in CGGA dataset and TCGA dataset. C, D Patients in high risk group had a significantly shorter OS than in low riskgroup in both of the CGGA databaset and the TCGA dataset. E The association between OS and genes used to generate risk score were demonstrated individually
Fig. 2Nature-killer cell gene signature is associated with clinicopathological features in CGGA and TCGA datasets. A Heatmap of the correlation between risk score (RS) and clinicopathologic features in CGGA dataset. B Heatmap of the correlation between risk score (RS) and clinicopathologic features in TGGA dataset
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of clinical pathologic features for OS in CGGA
| CGGA cohort | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| Characteristics | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||
| Age | < 0.001 | 1.033 | 1.02–1.047 | 0.938 | 1.001 | 0.985–1.017 |
| Gender | 0.621 | 0.931 | 0.7–1.237 | 0.897 | 0.979 | 0.707–1.356 |
| Grade | < 0.001 | 2.017 | 1.736–2.344 | < 0.001 | 1.455 | 1.199–1.767 |
| Subtype | < 0.001 | 1.631 | 1.428–1.862 | 0.007 | 1.281 | 1.069–1.535 |
| IDH1 | < 0.001 | 0.367 | 0.27–0.501 | 0.118 | 0.721 | 0.479–1.086 |
| Radio | < 0.001 | 0.505 | 0.368–0.694 | < 0.001 | 0.49 | 0.345–0.696 |
| Chemo | 0.001 | 1.658 | 1.219–2.255 | 0.098 | 1.343 | 0.947–1.905 |
| Risk score | < 0.001 | 17.093 | 6.993–41.783 | 0.048 | 4.1 | 1.009–16.652 |
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of clinical pathologic features for OS in TCGA
| TCGA cohort | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| Characteristics | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||
| Age | < 0.001 | 1.073 | 1.061–1.084 | < 0.001 | 1.066 | 1.049–1.084 |
| Gender | 0.462 | 0.9 | 0.681–1.191 | 0.68 | 1.08 | 0.749–1.559 |
| Grade | < 0.001 | 3.093 | 2.637–3.628 | 0.028 | 1.33 | 1.032–1.714 |
| Subtype | < 0.001 | 2.004 | 1.765–2.275 | 0.11 | 1.194 | 0.961–1.484 |
| IDH | < 0.001 | 8.561 | 6.228–11.768 | 0.17 | 1.616 | 0.814–3.21 |
| MGMT promoter | < 0.001 | 0.228 | 0.139–0.376 | 0.026 | 0.508 | 0.28–0.921 |
| 1p/19q | < 0.001 | 2.964 | 2.17–4.047 | 0.5 | 1.165 | 0.748–1.816 |
| Risk score | < 0.001 | 1.126 | 1.099–1.154 | 0.007 | 1.066 | 1.018–1.117 |
The correlation between clinical pathologic features and RS in CGGA
| Characteristics | Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.115 | 0.068 |
| Grade | 0.582 | < 0.001 |
| Subtype | 0.583 | < 0.001 |
| IDH1 | −0.609 | < 0.001 |
| Radio | −0.054 | 0.393 |
| Chemo | 0.195 | 0.002 |
The correlation between clinical pathologic features and RS in in TCGA
| Characteristics | Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | − 0.42 | 0.358 |
| Grade | 0.497 | < 0.001 |
| Subtype | 0.606 | < 0.001 |
| IDH | −0.687 | < 0.001 |
| MGMT promoter | −0.434 | < 0.001 |
| 1p/19q | −0.561 | < 0.001 |
Fig. 3Nature-killer cell gene expression is correlated with clinicopathological features of gliomas. A The relationship of RNA expression of Natural-killer cell gene with glioma WHO. B IDH wild type have a higher expression level of NK related gene than IDH mutant type. CThe relationship of RNA expression of Natural-killer cell gene with glioma subtypes. D-F Consistent results were also validated in the TCGA datasets
Fig. 4Gene functional characteristics related to risk scores. GO and KEGG analysis of differential genes between low- and high risk cases in two cohorts (A and B)
Fig. 5Comparison of difference in immune status between high-risk and low-risk groups. Corrlation heatmap showed correlation analysis between risk score (RS) and immune checkpoints/NK marker genes in CGGA (A) and TCGA (B) dataset
Fig. 6Prediction of patient outcome based on the RS and immune checkpoint gene expression. A Correlation coefficient of the RS and PD1/PDL1 gene expression. B The expression distribution of PD1/PDL1 in the high- and low-risk groups. C Overall survival curves of glioma patient stratified by the RS and immune checkpoint gene expression