Craig Rosenbloom1,2, Daniel Broman3, Wing Chu4, Robin Chatterjee5,6, Katrine Okholm Kryger2,7,8. 1. The Football Association, Technical Directorate, Burton-upon-Trent, UK. 2. Queen Mary University of London, Sport and Exercise Medicine, London, UK. 3. Isokinetic Medical Group, London, UK. 4. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK. 5. Institute of Sport, Exercise and Health, London, UK. 6. British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine, 3 Jetstream Dr, Doncaster, UK. 7. St Mary's University, Faculty of Sport, Health and Applied Science, London, UK. 8. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore sport-related concussion (SRC) awareness, behaviours, and attitudes of medical team staff working in elite football in the United Kingdom. Including usage and awareness of the FA concussion guidelines, concussion education rates of players and coaching staff, and collection of baseline concussion assessments. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study distributed online by organisations including or representing medical staff working in elite football in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: 120 responses were gathered. High awareness rates of the FA guidelines were found (97%) with variable rates of player and coaching staff concussion education. Baseline concussion assessments were collected by 78%. Of those, 99% collected SCAT5 with low rates of other neuro-psychometric testing (17%). Confidence of pitch-side SRC recognition was high (93% feeling very confident or confident). Introduction of a 'concussion' substitute was seen as strongly positive for player welfare (85% strongly agreeing or agreeing). CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of FA concussion guidelines, and collection of SCAT5 baseline testing was high. Player and coaching staff concussion education rates were low, as was the use of neuro-psychometric testing beyond the use of the SCAT5. There was strong support the introduction of a 'concussion' substitute being a positive thing for player welfare.
OBJECTIVES: To explore sport-related concussion (SRC) awareness, behaviours, and attitudes of medical team staff working in elite football in the United Kingdom. Including usage and awareness of the FA concussion guidelines, concussion education rates of players and coaching staff, and collection of baseline concussion assessments. METHODS: Cross-sectional questionnaire study distributed online by organisations including or representing medical staff working in elite football in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: 120 responses were gathered. High awareness rates of the FA guidelines were found (97%) with variable rates of player and coaching staff concussion education. Baseline concussion assessments were collected by 78%. Of those, 99% collected SCAT5 with low rates of other neuro-psychometric testing (17%). Confidence of pitch-side SRC recognition was high (93% feeling very confident or confident). Introduction of a 'concussion' substitute was seen as strongly positive for player welfare (85% strongly agreeing or agreeing). CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of FA concussion guidelines, and collection of SCAT5 baseline testing was high. Player and coaching staff concussion education rates were low, as was the use of neuro-psychometric testing beyond the use of the SCAT5. There was strong support the introduction of a 'concussion' substitute being a positive thing for player welfare.