Literature DB >> 35235023

Sonographic fetal head circumference is associated with trial of labor after cesarean section success.

Raanan Meyer1,2,3, Abraham Tsur4,5, Lee Tenenbaum5, Nizan Mor5, Michal Zamir, Gabriel Levin6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose is to study the association of the fetal sonographic head circumference (SHC) with trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) success rate, among women with no prior vaginal deliveries.
METHODS: A retrospective case-control study including all women with no prior vaginal delivery undergoing TOLAC during 3/2011-6/2020 with a sonographic estimated fetal weight within one week from delivery. TOLAC success and failure groups were compared.
RESULTS: Of 1232 included women, 948 (76.9%) delivered vaginally. The mean fetal SHC was smaller in the TOLAC success group (330 ± 10 vs. 333 ± 11 mm, p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, predelivery BMI, hypertensive disorders, gestational age at prior CD, SHC and epidural analgesia administration were independently associated with TOLAC success. A ROC analysis of the multivariable model composed of the factors found independently associated with TOLAC success, excluding SHC, yielded an area under curve of 0.659 (95% CI 0.622-0.697) compared with 0.668 (95% CI 0.630-0.705) with SHC included.
CONCLUSION: Smaller SHC is independently associated with TOLAC success among women that did not deliver vaginally before, and has additive clinical value for the prediction of TOLAC success when combined with non-sonographic factors.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Head circumference; Trial of labor after cesarean delivery; Ultrasound; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Year:  2022        PMID: 35235023     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06472-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  40 in total

1.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Vaginal birth after cesarean success in high-risk women: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Regan; C Keup; K Wolfe; C Snyder; E DeFranco
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications.

Authors:  Aya Takeya; Emi Adachi; Yoshimitsu Takahashi; Eiji Kondoh; Masaki Mandai; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 4.  New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted?

Authors:  Karen B Eden; Marian McDonagh; Mary Anna Denman; Nicole Marshall; Cathy Emeis; Rongwei Fu; Rosalind Janik; Miranda Walker; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system.

Authors:  B L Flamm; A M Geiger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Trial of labor after cesarean in primiparous women with fetal macrosomia.

Authors:  Naama Lessans; Stav Martonovits; Misgav Rottenstreich; Simcha Yagel; Geffen Kleinstern; Hen Y Sela; Shay Porat; Gabriel Levin; Joshua I Rosenbloom; Yosef Ezra; Amihai Rottenstreich
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Births: Final Data for 2017.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman; Anne K Driscoll; Patrick Drake
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2018-11

Review 8.  Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Michelle Berlin; Marian McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Benjamin Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: a multicentre study on prognostic factors and feasibility.

Authors:  Alessandra Familiari; Caterina Neri; Alessandro Caruso; Chiara Airoldi; Francesco Barone-Adesi; Giovanni Zanconato; Giulia Bolomini; Francesca Presti
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.344

10.  The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates.

Authors:  Mohammed A Elkousy; Mary Sammel; Erika Stevens; Jeffrey F Peipert; George Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.