| Literature DB >> 35234994 |
Abdulhalim Awad1, Shimaa Elnemr1, Hossam Hodeib2, Doaa El Amrousy3.
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platecrit in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD), to assess the predictive value of these platelet activation markers for adverse outcomes, and to correlate their levels with various data in these patients. This prospective cohort study included 60 children with PAH-CHD as group I and 60 children with CHD and no PAH as group II. Another 60 healthy children of matched age and sex served as the control group. All included children were evaluated by echocardiography. MPV, PDW, and platecrit were also measured using an automated blood counter. All patients were followed up for death or readmission for 6 months. MPV, PDW, and platecrit were significantly higher in group I compared to group II and the control group and they correlated well with increasing severity of PAH. MPV, PDW, and platecrit positively correlated with right ventricular diameter and mean pulmonary artery pressure, however they correlated negatively with right ventricular systolic and diastolic function. The best cut-off of platelet activation markers levels to predict poor prognosis in group I was > 11.2 FL with 75% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity for MPV, > 12.7 FL with 75% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity for PDW, and > 0.505% with 75% sensitivity and 93.2% specificity for platecrit. MPV, PDW, and platecrit were elevated in children with PAH-CHD and found to be good predictive markers for poor prognosis in these children.Entities:
Keywords: Congenital heart disease; Platelet activation markers; Predictive markers; Prognosis; Pulmonary arterial hypertension
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35234994 PMCID: PMC9293825 DOI: 10.1007/s00246-022-02847-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Cardiol ISSN: 0172-0643 Impact factor: 1.838
Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the studied groups
| Variables | Group I | Group II | Control group | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 5.5 (3–16) | 3.5 (2–14) | 9 (6–21) | 0.058 |
| Sex (male:female) | 32:28 | 40:20 | 26:34 | 0.191 |
| Weight (kg) | 6.3 (5–8) | 5.5 (4–10) | 9 (8–12) | 0.001 |
| HR (beats/min) | 128.2 ± 19.3 | 118.2 ± 17.9 | 90.6 ± 16.7 | 0.001 |
| RR (cycle/min) | 40.6 ± 4.6 | 40.7 ± 4.6 | 37.5 ± 4.5 | 0.01 |
| O2 sat (%) | 96 (94–97) | 92 (85–98) | 98 (96–98) | 0.001 |
| Platecrit (%) | 0.36 ± 0.13 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | < 0.001 |
| MPV (FL) | 10.19 ± 1.44 | 8.80 ± 0.73 | 8.42 ± 0.98 | < 0.001 |
| PDW (FL) | 13.20 ± 3.10 | 9.88 ± 1.39 | 9.76 ± 1.35 | < 0.001 |
| Diagnosis: N (%) | ||||
| VSD | 20 (33.3%) | 15 (25%) | ||
| VSD + ASD | 14 (23.3%) | 10 (16.7%) | ||
| VSD + PDA | 6 (10%) | 3 (5%) | ||
| VSD + MR | 2 (3.3%) | 1 (1.7%) | ||
| VSD + PS | 0 (0%) | 6 (10%) | ||
| ASD | 2 (3.3%) | 5 (8.3%) | ||
| PDA | 7 (11.7%) | 6 (10%) | ||
| TGA | 5 (8.3%) | 6 (10%) | ||
| TOF | 0 (0%) | 6 (10%) | ||
| AVC | 4 (6.7%) | 2 (3.3%) |
HR heart rate, RR respiratory rate, MPV mean platelet volume, PDW platelet distribution width, VSD ventricular septal defect, ASD atrial septal defect, PDA patent ductus arteriosus, MR mitral regurge, PS pulmonary stenosis, TGA transposition of great arteries, TOF tetralogy of Fallot, AVC atrioventricular canal
Echocardiographic parameters in the studied groups
| Variables | Group I | Group II | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RV FAC | 34.9 ± 5 | 38.8 ± 5.2 | 40.4 ± 2.8 | 0.002 |
| RV E/A ratio | 1 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | < 0.001 |
| RVD (mm) | 38 ± 4 | 30 ± 3 | 28 ± 2 | 0.01 |
| LV FS (%) | 36.1 ± 2.1 | 36.9 ± 3.4 | 37.5 ± 1.3 | 0.090 |
| mPAP (mmHg) | 48 (30–77) | 18 (16–18) | 14 (13–16) | < 0.001 |
RV FAC right ventricular fractional area change, RVD right ventricular diameter, LV FS left ventricular fraction shortening, mPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure
Platelet activation markers in different grades of PH in group I
| Parameter | Mild PH | Moderate PH | Severe PH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platecrit (%) | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 0.38 ± 0.17 | 0.54 ± 0.16 | 0.001 |
| PostHoc test | Mild vs moderate = 0.149, mild versus severe = 0.001, moderate versus severe = 0.001 | |||
| MPV (FL) | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 12.4 ± 1.2 | 0.002 |
| PostHoc test | Mild vs moderate = 0.819, mild versus severe = 0.002, moderate versus severe = 0.009 | |||
| PDW (FL) | 12.1 ± 2.2 | 13.2 ± 2.1 | 18.6 ± 3.7 | < 0.001 |
| PostHoc test | Mild vs moderate = 0.936, mild versus severe = 0.004, moderate versus severe = 0.005 | |||
PH pulmonary hypertension, MPV mean platelet volume, PDW platelet distribution width
Correlation between platelet activation markers and different parameters in group I
| Parameters | MPV (FL) | PDW (FL) | Platecrit (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (months) | 0.184 | 0.332 | 0.259 | 0.168 | 0.007 | 0.971 |
| Weight (kg) | 0.272 | 0.146 | 0.197 | 0.296 | 0.003 | 0.989 |
| HR (beats/min) | − 0.234 | 0.212 | 0.099 | 0.603 | 0.186 | 0.325 |
| RR (cycle/min) | 0.039 | 0.839 | 0.214 | 0.256 | 0.398 | 0.029 |
| O2 saturation (%) | − 0.627 | < 0.001 | − 0.330 | 0.075 | − 0.388 | 0.034 |
| LV FS (%) | − 0.121 | 0.523 | − 0.264 | 0.158 | − 0.249 | 0.184 |
| RVD (cm) | 0.532 | 0.002 | 0.593 | 0.001 | 0.615 | < 0.001 |
| RV FAC | − 0.600 | < 0.001 | − 0.410 | 0.024 | − 0.469 | 0.009 |
| RV E/A ratio | − 0.463 | 0.010 | − 0.606* | < 0.001 | − 0.659 | < 0.001 |
| mPAP (mmHg) | 0.598 | < 0.001 | 0.646 | < 0.001 | 0.697 | < 0.001 |
MPV mean platelet volume, PDW platelet distribution width, HR heart rate, RR respiratory rate, RVD right ventricular diameter, RV FAC right ventricular fractional area change, LV FS left ventricular fraction shortening, mPAP mean pulmonary artery pressure
Platelet indices in children with CHD-PH with good and bad prognosis on follow-up
| Parameters | Prognosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Good ( | Poor ( | ||
| Platecrit (%) | 0.32 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.10 | < 0.001 |
| MPV (FL) | 9.83 ± 1.15 | 12.50 ± 0.96 | 0.005 |
| PDW (FL) | 12.47 ± 2.35 | 17.95 ± 3.50 | 0.04 |
MPV mean platelet volume, PDW platelet distribution width
Fig. 1ROC curve showed that MPV at a cut-off > 11.2 FL had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 96.6%, PDW at a cut-off > 12.7 FL had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 61.5%, and platecrit at cut-off > 0.505% had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 93.2% to predict a poor prognosis in children with PAH-CHD